134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220210)
1. Hyperspectral wide gap second derivative analysis for in vivo detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Zheng W; Wang C; Chang S; Zhang S; Xu RX
J Biomed Opt; 2015 Dec; 20(12):121303. PubMed ID: 26220210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Multi-scale hyperspectral imaging of cervical neoplasia.
Wang C; Zheng W; Bu Y; Chang S; Zhang S; Xu RX
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Jun; 293(6):1309-17. PubMed ID: 26446578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A fusion-based approach for uterine cervical cancer histology image classification.
De S; Stanley RJ; Lu C; Long R; Antani S; Thoma G; Zuna R
Comput Med Imaging Graph; 2013; 37(7-8):475-87. PubMed ID: 24075360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sources of scattering in cervical tissue: determination of the scattering coefficient by confocal microscopy.
Collier T; Follen M; Malpica A; Richards-Kortum R
Appl Opt; 2005 Apr; 44(11):2072-81. PubMed ID: 15835356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Automated image analysis of digital colposcopy for the detection of cervical neoplasia.
Park SY; Follen M; Milbourne A; Rhodes H; Malpica A; MacKinnon N; MacAulay C; Markey MK; Richards-Kortum R
J Biomed Opt; 2008; 13(1):014029. PubMed ID: 18315387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optical detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia in vivo: results of a 604-patient study.
Huh WK; Cestero RM; Garcia FA; Gold MA; Guido RS; McIntyre-Seltman K; Harper DM; Burke L; Sum ST; Flewelling RF; Alvarez RD
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 May; 190(5):1249-57. PubMed ID: 15167826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diffuse reflectance patterns in cervical spectroscopy.
Marín NM; Milbourne A; Rhodes H; Ehlen T; Miller D; Benedet L; Richards-Kortum R; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S116-20. PubMed ID: 16165197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Novel optical detection system for in vivo identification and localization of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Schomacker KT; Meese TM; Jiang C; Abele CC; Dickson K; Sum ST; Flewelling RF
J Biomed Opt; 2006; 11(3):34009. PubMed ID: 16822059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimal excitation wavelengths for discrimination of cervical neoplasia.
Chang SK; Follen M; Malpica A; Utzinger U; Staerkel G; Cox D; Atkinson EN; MacAulay C; Richards-Kortum R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Oct; 49(10):1102-11. PubMed ID: 12374334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical study of quantitative diagnosis of early cervical cancer based on the classification of acetowhitening kinetics.
Wu T; Cheung TH; Yim SF; Qu JY
J Biomed Opt; 2010; 15(2):026001. PubMed ID: 20459246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Role of cervicitis in the Raman-based optical diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Martinho Hda S; Monteiro da Silva CM; Yassoyama MC; Andrade Pde O; Bitar RA; Santo AM; Arisawa EA; Martin AA
J Biomed Opt; 2008; 13(5):054029. PubMed ID: 19021409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hyperspectral imaging and quantitative analysis for prostate cancer detection.
Akbari H; Halig LV; Schuster DM; Osunkoya A; Master V; Nieh PT; Chen GZ; Fei B
J Biomed Opt; 2012 Jul; 17(7):076005. PubMed ID: 22894488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Initial neural net construction for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by fluorescence imaging.
Parker MF; Mooradian GC; Okimoto GS; O'Connor DM; Miyazawa K; Saggese SJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Aug; 187(2):398-402. PubMed ID: 12193932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using acetowhite opacity index for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Li W; Venkataraman S; Gustafsson U; Oyama JC; Ferris DG; Lieberman RW
J Biomed Opt; 2009; 14(1):014020. PubMed ID: 19256708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Real-time in-vivo microscopic imaging of the cervix using confocal laser endomicroscopy: preliminary observations and feasibility study.
Degueldre M; Vandromme J; de Wind A; Feoli F
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2016 Jul; 25(4):335-43. PubMed ID: 26287698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Real-time reflectance confocal microscopy: comparison of two-dimensional images and three-dimensional image stacks for detection of cervical precancer.
Collier T; Guillaud M; Follen M; Malpica A; Richards-Kortum R
J Biomed Opt; 2007; 12(2):024021. PubMed ID: 17477736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Enhancement of early cervical cancer diagnosis with epithelial layer analysis of fluorescence lifetime images.
Gu J; Fu CY; Ng BK; Liu LB; Lim-Tan SK; Lee CG
PLoS One; 2015; 10(5):e0125706. PubMed ID: 25966026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic efficacy of computer extracted image features in optical coherence tomography of the precancerous cervix.
Kang W; Qi X; Tresser NJ; Kareta M; Belinson JL; Rollins AM
Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 21361180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital holographic microscopy as screening tool for cervical cancer preliminary study.
Benzerdjeb N; Garbar C; Camparo P; Sevestre H
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Aug; 124(8):573-80. PubMed ID: 27136615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pattern Classification of Images from Acetic Acid-Based Cervical Cancer Screening: A Review.
Kudva V; Prasad K
Crit Rev Biomed Eng; 2018; 46(2):117-133. PubMed ID: 30055529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
