134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220210)
41. Distribution of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2, 3 and cancer on the uterine cervix.
Pretorius RG; Zhang X; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Ren SD; Bao YP; Qiao YL
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2006 Jan; 10(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 16378031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The immunoexpression of heparanase 2 in normal epithelium, intraepithelial, and invasive squamous neoplasia of the cervix.
Marques RM; Focchi GR; Theodoro TR; Castelo A; Pinhal MA; Nicolau SM
J Low Genit Tract Dis; 2012 Jul; 16(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 22453758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Super-resolution reconstruction of hyperspectral images.
Akgun T; Altunbasak Y; Mersereau RM
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2005 Nov; 14(11):1860-75. PubMed ID: 16279185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. The detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia by electrical impedance spectroscopy: the effects of acetic acid and tissue homogeneity.
Balasubramani L; Brown BH; Healey J; Tidy JA
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Nov; 115(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 19744703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Bayesian approach with hidden Markov modeling and mean field approximation for hyperspectral data analysis.
Bali N; Mohammad-Djafari A
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2008 Feb; 17(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 18270113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Characterization of a spectrograph based hyperspectral imaging system.
Kosec M; Bürmen M; Tomaževič D; Pernuš F; Likar B
Opt Express; 2013 May; 21(10):12085-99. PubMed ID: 23736429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. An automated machine vision system for the histological grading of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN).
Keenan SJ; Diamond J; McCluggage WG; Bharucha H; Thompson D; Bartels PH; Hamilton PW
J Pathol; 2000 Nov; 192(3):351-62. PubMed ID: 11054719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Results of a pilot study of multispectral digital colposcopy for the in vivo detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.
Milbourne A; Park SY; Benedet JL; Miller D; Ehlen T; Rhodes H; Malpica A; Matisic J; Van Niekirk D; Atkinson EN; Hadad N; Mackinnon N; Macaulay C; Richards-Kortum R; Follen M
Gynecol Oncol; 2005 Dec; 99(3 Suppl 1):S67-75. PubMed ID: 16202444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Cutaneous wound analysis using hyperspectral imaging.
Shah SA; Bachrach N; Spear SJ; Letbetter DS; Stone RA; Dhir R; Prichard JW; Brown HG; LaFramboise WA
Biotechniques; 2003 Feb; 34(2):408-13. PubMed ID: 12613264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Nuclei-Based Features for Uterine Cervical Cancer Histology Image Analysis With Fusion-Based Classification.
Guo P; Banerjee K; Joe Stanley R; Long R; Antani S; Thoma G; Zuna R; Frazier SR; Moss RH; Stoecker WV
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2016 Nov; 20(6):1595-1607. PubMed ID: 26529792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Comparative study of semi-implicit schemes for nonlinear diffusion in hyperspectral imagery.
Duarte-Carvajalino JM; Castillo PE; Velez-Reyes M
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2007 May; 16(5):1303-14. PubMed ID: 17491461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. [Performance of computer-assisted imaging system in detection of squamous intraepithelial lesion of uterine cervix].
Gao YZ; Huo YL; Sun HX; Qi YF; Wang JO; Lü QJ
Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 42(8):543-6. PubMed ID: 24246921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Benefit and burden in the Dutch cytology-based vs high-risk human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer screening program.
Loopik DL; Koenjer LM; Siebers AG; Melchers WJG; Bekkers RLM
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Feb; 224(2):200.e1-200.e9. PubMed ID: 32800820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Clinical analysis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia with vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia.
He Y; Zhao Q; Geng YN; Yang SL; Yin CH; Wu YM
Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Apr; 96(17):e6700. PubMed ID: 28445274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. [The natural history of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I and the clinical significance of p16(INK4a) protein as a marker of progression in cervical intraepithelial neoplasia I].
Wang R; Li X; Qian M; Niu J; You Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Mar; 50(3):210-5. PubMed ID: 26268412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Tensor methods for hyperspectral data analysis: a space object material identification study.
Zhang Q; Wang H; Plemmons RJ; Pauca VP
J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2008 Dec; 25(12):3001-12. PubMed ID: 19037391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Sparse demixing of hyperspectral images.
Greer JB
IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jan; 21(1):219-28. PubMed ID: 21693418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Histological skin morphology enhancement base on molecular hyperspectral imaging technology.
Li Q; Sun Z; Wang Y; Liu H; Guo F; Zhu J
Skin Res Technol; 2014 Aug; 20(3):332-40. PubMed ID: 24267453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Predicting regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 in women under 25 years.
Sykes PH; Simcock BJ; Innes CR; Harker D; Williman JA; Whitehead M; van der Griend RA; Lawton BA; Hibma M; Fitzgerald P; Dudley NM; Petrich S; Eva L; Bergzoll C; Kathuria J; McPherson G; Tristram A; Faherty J; Hardie D; Robertson A; Robertson V; Pather S; Wrede CD; Gastrell F; Fentiman G; John M; White E; Parker C; Sadler L
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):222.e1-222.e13. PubMed ID: 34534506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Detection of cervical lesions by multivariate analysis of diffuse reflectance spectra: a clinical study.
Prabitha VG; Suchetha S; Jayanthi JL; Baiju KV; Rema P; Anuraj K; Mathews A; Sebastian P; Subhash N
Lasers Med Sci; 2016 Jan; 31(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 26521184
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
