These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220268)

  • 1. An inability to set independent attentional control settings by hemifield.
    Becker MW; Ravizza SM; Peltier C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Nov; 77(8):2640-52. PubMed ID: 26220268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The visual hemifield asymmetry in the spatial blink during singleton search and feature search.
    Burnham BR; Rozell CA; Kasper A; Bianco NE; Delliturri A
    Brain Cogn; 2011 Apr; 75(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 21295901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can attentional control settings be maintained for two color-location conjunctions? Evidence from an RSVP task.
    Irons JL; Remington RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Jul; 75(5):862-75. PubMed ID: 23444082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Attentional engagement is not sufficient to prevent spatial capture.
    Zivony A; Lamy D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2014 Jan; 76(1):19-31. PubMed ID: 24043565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.
    Stilwell BT; Bahle B; Vecera SP
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2019 Mar; 45(3):419-433. PubMed ID: 30802131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Previous attentional set can induce an attentional blink with task-irrelevant initial targets.
    Thompson C; Underwood G; Crundall D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2007 Dec; 60(12):1603-9. PubMed ID: 17853197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Attending to multiple visual streams: interactions between location-based and category-based attentional selection.
    Fagioli S; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1628-41. PubMed ID: 18823252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual field asymmetries in object individuation.
    Harris IM; Wong C; Andrews S
    Conscious Cogn; 2015 Dec; 37():194-206. PubMed ID: 26433638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Distinct roles of the intraparietal sulcus and temporoparietal junction in attentional capture from distractor features: An individual differences approach.
    Painter DR; Dux PE; Mattingley JB
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Jul; 74():50-62. PubMed ID: 25724234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The perceptual enhancement by spatial attention is impaired during the attentional blink.
    Bae E; Jung S; Han SW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Oct; 190():150-158. PubMed ID: 30119048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink.
    Nieuwenhuis S; Jepma M; La Fors S; Olivers CN
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18359543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Irrelevant auditory and visual events induce a visual attentional blink.
    Van der Burg E; Nieuwenstein MR; Theeuwes J; Olivers CN
    Exp Psychol; 2013; 60(2):80-9. PubMed ID: 23047915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The attentional blink: A relational accountof attentional engagement.
    Becker SI; Manoharan RT; Folk CL
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2021 Feb; 28(1):219-227. PubMed ID: 32989720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interlateral asymmetry in the time course of the effect of a peripheral prime stimulus.
    Castro-Barros BA; Righi LL; Grechi G; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Brain Cogn; 2008 Apr; 66(3):265-79. PubMed ID: 17961895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Right visual-field advantage in the attentional blink: Asymmetry in attentional gating across time and space.
    Bergerbest D; Shilkrot O; Joseph M; Salti M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2017 Oct; 79(7):1979-1992. PubMed ID: 28643206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. No commonality between attentional capture and attentional blink.
    Kawahara JI; Kihara K
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 May; 64(5):991-1008. PubMed ID: 21113860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nasotemporal ERP differences: evidence for increased inhibition of temporal distractors.
    Huber-Huber C; Grubert A; Ansorge U; Eimer M
    J Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 113(7):2210-9. PubMed ID: 25589587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sustained division of spatial attention to multiple locations within one hemifield.
    Malinowski P; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    Neurosci Lett; 2007 Feb; 414(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 17207932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Attentional load and sensory competition in human vision: modulation of fMRI responses by load at fixation during task-irrelevant stimulation in the peripheral visual field.
    Schwartz S; Vuilleumier P; Hutton C; Maravita A; Dolan RJ; Driver J
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Jun; 15(6):770-86. PubMed ID: 15459076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.