These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220268)

  • 21. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Feature-based attention is functionally distinct from relation-based attention: The double dissociation between color-based capture and color-relation-based capture of attention.
    Du F; Jiao J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 Apr; 42(4):480-93. PubMed ID: 26523490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Hemisphere division and its effect on selective attention: a generality examination of Lavie's load theory.
    Nishimura R; Yoshizaki K; Kato K; Hatta T
    Int J Neurosci; 2009; 119(9):1429-45. PubMed ID: 19922366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sustained Splits of Attention within versus across Visual Hemifields Produce Distinct Spatial Gain Profiles.
    Walter S; Keitel C; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 26401813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Stronger interference from distractors in the right hemifield during visual search.
    Carlei C; Kerzel D
    Laterality; 2018 Mar; 23(2):152-165. PubMed ID: 28502226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. ERP evidence for cross-modal audiovisual effects of endogenous spatial attention within hemifields.
    Eimer M; van Velzen J; Driver J
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Mar; 16(2):272-88. PubMed ID: 15068597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. All set! Evidence of simultaneous attentional control settings for multiple target colors.
    Irons JL; Folk CL; Remington RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):758-75. PubMed ID: 22201470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Made you blink! Contingent attentional capture produces a spatial blink.
    Folk CL; Leber AB; Egeth HE
    Percept Psychophys; 2002 Jul; 64(5):741-53. PubMed ID: 12201333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Neural correlates of conscious perception in the attentional blink.
    Kranczioch C; Debener S; Schwarzbach J; Goebel R; Engel AK
    Neuroimage; 2005 Feb; 24(3):704-14. PubMed ID: 15652305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On-line attentional selection from competing stimuli in opposite visual fields: effects on human visual cortex and control processes.
    Geng JJ; Eger E; Ruff CC; Kristjánsson A; Rotshtein P; Driver J
    J Neurophysiol; 2006 Nov; 96(5):2601-12. PubMed ID: 16855105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Hemifield effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex.
    Kraft A; Kehrer S; Hagendorf H; Brandt SA
    Eur J Neurosci; 2011 Jun; 33(12):2349-58. PubMed ID: 21545658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Change is good: Inter-trial switching of target category improves attentional selection in time.
    Sdoia S; Ferlazzo F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2016 Feb; 164():46-55. PubMed ID: 26722836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The attentional blink within and across the hemispheres: Evidence from a patient with a complete section of the corpus callosum.
    Ptito A; Brisson B; Dell'Acqua R; Lassonde M; Jolicoeur P
    Biol Psychol; 2009 Sep; 82(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 19539687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Attentional repulsion effects produced by feature-guided shifts of attention.
    Baumeler D; Nako R; Born S; Eimer M
    J Vis; 2020 Mar; 20(3):10. PubMed ID: 32232375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiple attentional control settings at distinct locations without the confounding of repetition priming.
    Cho SA; Cho YS
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Oct; 80(7):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 29959663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Primary visual cortex reflects behavioral performance in the attentional blink.
    Stein T; Vallines I; Schneider WX
    Neuroreport; 2008 Aug; 19(13):1277-81. PubMed ID: 18695507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Attentional and anatomical considerations for the representation of simple stimuli in visual short-term memory: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Perron R; Lefebvre C; Robitaille N; Brisson B; Gosselin F; Arguin M; Jolicoeur P
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):222-32. PubMed ID: 19224244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence for divided automatic attention.
    Silva PS; Ribeiro-do-Valle LE
    Braz J Med Biol Res; 2008 Feb; 41(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 18297196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dissociating between the N2pc and attentional shifting: An attentional blink study.
    Zivony A; Allon AS; Luria R; Lamy D
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Dec; 121():153-163. PubMed ID: 30419246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.