These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220268)

  • 41. Dissociating between the N2pc and attentional shifting: An attentional blink study.
    Zivony A; Allon AS; Luria R; Lamy D
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Dec; 121():153-163. PubMed ID: 30419246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Irrelevant words trigger an attentional blink.
    Stein T; Zwickel J; Kitzmantel M; Ritter J; Schneider WX
    Exp Psychol; 2010; 57(4):301-7. PubMed ID: 20178947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The control of attentional target selection in a colour/colour conjunction task.
    Berggren N; Eimer M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2383-2396. PubMed ID: 27357843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes.
    Reeder RR; van Zoest W; Peelen MV
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 May; 77(4):1070-80. PubMed ID: 25810159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Attentional capture decreases when distractors remain visible during rapid serial visual presentations.
    Inukai T; Kumada T; Kawahara J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):939-50. PubMed ID: 20436191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Overt attention in contextual cuing of visual search is driven by the attentional set, but not by the predictiveness of distractors.
    Beesley T; Hanafi G; Vadillo MA; Shanks DR; Livesey EJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2018 May; 44(5):707-721. PubMed ID: 29608077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Salience detection and attentional capture.
    Schubö A
    Psychol Res; 2009 Mar; 73(2):233-43. PubMed ID: 19066945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Anatomical constraints on attention: hemifield independence is a signature of multifocal spatial selection.
    Alvarez GA; Gill J; Cavanagh P
    J Vis; 2012 May; 12(5):9. PubMed ID: 22637710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Attentional blinks as errors in temporal binding.
    Popple AV; Levi DM
    Vision Res; 2007 Oct; 47(23):2973-81. PubMed ID: 17888482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Altering attentional control settings causes persistent biases of visual attention.
    Knight HC; Smith DT; Knight DC; Ellison A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(1):129-49. PubMed ID: 25801329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Searching for two things at once: establishment of multiple attentional control settings on a trial-by-trial basis.
    Roper ZJ; Vecera SP
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2012 Dec; 19(6):1114-21. PubMed ID: 22971903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Deficits in selective attention in symptomatic Huntington disease: assessment using an attentional blink paradigm.
    Georgiou-Karistianis N; Farrow M; Wilson-Ching M; Churchyard A; Bradshaw JL; Sheppard DM
    Cogn Behav Neurol; 2012 Mar; 25(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 22310306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Attentional control settings prevent abrupt onsets from capturing visual spatial attention.
    Al-Aidroos N; Harrison S; Pratt J
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Jan; 63(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 19728228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Spatiotemporal competition and task-relevance shape the spatial distribution of emotional interference during rapid visual processing: Evidence from gaze-contingent eye-tracking.
    Kennedy BL; Pearson D; Sutton DJ; Beesley T; Most SB
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Feb; 80(2):426-438. PubMed ID: 29147961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Possible recoding of visual space in covert orienting tasks.
    Berlucchi G; Aglioti S; Chelazzi L; Peru A; Tassinari G
    Arch Ital Biol; 1999 May; 137(2-3):127-37. PubMed ID: 10349491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Neural correlates of attentional capture in visual search.
    de Fockert J; Rees G; Frith C; Lavie N
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Jun; 16(5):751-9. PubMed ID: 15200703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Distractor interference in focused attention tasks is not mediated by attention capture.
    Gronau N; Cohen A; Ben-Shakhar G
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1685-95. PubMed ID: 19382007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Hemispheric asymmetries in visual search.
    Poynter W; Roberts C
    Laterality; 2012; 17(6):711-26. PubMed ID: 23098199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Temporal dynamics of attentional control settings in patients with spatial neglect.
    Ptak R; Golay L
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):190-7. PubMed ID: 16643863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.