These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2622054)
1. [Appraising the storing of X-ray images]. Shima Y; Otani M; Takahashi M; Koga S Rinsho Hoshasen; 1989 Dec; 34(13):1607-16. PubMed ID: 2622054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Project ELF (Eliminate Legal size Files): the 25% solution to business expenses! J Microgr; 1982 Dec; 15(12):18-23. PubMed ID: 10261048 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Implementing a new x-ray film management system. Busching LW Radiol Technol; 1978; 49(5):603-10. PubMed ID: 644033 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microfilm system can reduce data cost. Sellers JH Hosp Financ Manage; 1976 Mar; 30(3):27-32. PubMed ID: 10236395 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiology film-management systems at Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center. Hayman AC Appl Radiol; 1988 Nov; 17(11):29-32. PubMed ID: 10292889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A new approach to the film library: time-unit filing. Palmucci JA Radiol Manage; 2000; 22(1):48-50. PubMed ID: 10787762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Calculate film costs before going electronic. King BF Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1997 Sep; Suppl():P47-50. PubMed ID: 10170156 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Improving productivity in the x-ray film file room. Briggs WE; Taylor JK Appl Radiol; 1983; 12(4):37-9, 43-5. PubMed ID: 10262050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Logetronic micro-film in radiological diagnosis with an integrated system of filming and filing(author's transl)]. Ross E Rofo; 1976 Jun; 124(6):585-94. PubMed ID: 133925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. If plain-film x-ray loses money, why go digital? Bell RA Diagn Imaging (San Franc); 1999 Nov; Suppl Digital():D13-5. PubMed ID: 10724729 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [X-ray archivation with microfilm]. van Dijk GP Chirurg; 1976; 47(2):62-5. PubMed ID: 964063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital x-ray systems. Part 1. An introduction to DX technologies and an evaluation of cassette DX systems. Health Devices; 2001 Aug; 30(8):273-310. PubMed ID: 11544777 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electronic versus film imaging: cost and quality considerations. Vizy KN Radiol Manage; 1986; 8(4):16-7. PubMed ID: 10279921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [The hemodynamics laboratory without cine film. A comparison between the production costs of 35-mm film and the recordable compact disk]. Danzi GB; Fiocca L; Dallavalle F; Capuano C; Chioin R; Riva S; Quaini E G Ital Cardiol; 1998 Aug; 28(8):887-92. PubMed ID: 9773314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. X-ray film discounts up 5%, incentives more attractive. Bernstein T Hosp Mater Manage; 1988 May; 13(5):12-3. PubMed ID: 10287883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Economic analysis of a filmless system based on the hospital information system. Kurihara Y; Yoshida S; Geshi H; Kubo Y; Kitazoe Y Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 2):1166-70. PubMed ID: 11604913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cost-benefit analysis of endoscopy reporting methods: handwritten, dictated and computerized. Groenen MJ; Ajodhia S; Wynstra JY; Lesterhuis W; van de Weijgert EJ; Kuipers EJ; Ouwendijk RJ Endoscopy; 2009 Jul; 41(7):603-9. PubMed ID: 19588288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]