197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220861)
1. Diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer: effect of b-value distribution on repeatability and cancer characterization.
Merisaari H; Toivonen J; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Aronen HJ; Jambor I
Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1212-1218. PubMed ID: 26220861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of prostate cancer using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2) : correlation with Gleason score and repeatability of region of interest analysis.
Toivonen J; Merisaari H; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Aronen HJ; Jambor I
Magn Reson Med; 2015 Oct; 74(4):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25329932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimization of b-value distribution for four mathematical models of prostate cancer diffusion-weighted imaging using b values up to 2000 s/mm(2): simulation and repeatability study.
Merisaari H; Jambor I
Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1954-69. PubMed ID: 25045885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of different mathematical models for diffusion-weighted imaging of normal prostate and prostate cancer using high b-values: a repeatability study.
Jambor I; Merisaari H; Taimen P; Boström P; Minn H; Pesola M; Aronen HJ
Magn Reson Med; 2015 May; 73(5):1988-98. PubMed ID: 25046482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Relaxation along fictitious field, diffusion-weighted imaging, and T2 mapping of prostate cancer: Prediction of cancer aggressiveness.
Jambor I; Pesola M; Merisaari H; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Liimatainen T; Aronen HJ
Magn Reson Med; 2016 May; 75(5):2130-40. PubMed ID: 26094849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fitting methods for intravoxel incoherent motion imaging of prostate cancer on region of interest level: Repeatability and gleason score prediction.
Merisaari H; Movahedi P; Perez IM; Toivonen J; Pesola M; Taimen P; Boström PJ; Pahikkala T; Kiviniemi A; Aronen HJ; Jambor I
Magn Reson Med; 2017 Mar; 77(3):1249-1264. PubMed ID: 26924552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of fitting models for prostate tissue characterization using extended-range b-factor diffusion-weighted imaging.
Langkilde F; Kobus T; Fedorov A; Dunne R; Tempany C; Mulkern RV; Maier SE
Magn Reson Med; 2018 Apr; 79(4):2346-2358. PubMed ID: 28718517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differentiation of central gland prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia using monoexponential and biexponential diffusion-weighted imaging.
Liu X; Zhou L; Peng W; Wang C; Wang H
Magn Reson Imaging; 2013 Oct; 31(8):1318-24. PubMed ID: 23791546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Discussion of correlation between histogram analysis of quantitative diffusion weighted imaging and Gleason score of prostate cancer].
Wen R; Zhao WL; Wei CG; Gu YF; Li MJ; Zhang YY; Shen JK
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Mar; 99(11):823-828. PubMed ID: 30893724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-Gaussian water diffusion kurtosis imaging of prostate cancer.
Suo S; Chen X; Wu L; Zhang X; Yao Q; Fan Y; Wang H; Xu J
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Jun; 32(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 24602826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.
Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Rotating frame relaxation imaging of prostate cancer: Repeatability, cancer detection, and Gleason score prediction.
Jambor I; Pesola M; Taimen P; Merisaari H; Boström PJ; Minn H; Liimatainen T; Aronen HJ
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jan; 75(1):337-44. PubMed ID: 25733132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparative study of Gaussian and non-Gaussian diffusion models for differential diagnosis of prostate cancer with in-bore transrectal MR-guided biopsy as a pathological reference.
Li C; Chen M; Wan B; Yu J; Liu M; Zhang W; Wang J
Acta Radiol; 2018 Nov; 59(11):1395-1402. PubMed ID: 29486596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Grading of Gliomas by Using Monoexponential, Biexponential, and Stretched Exponential Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion Kurtosis MR Imaging.
Bai Y; Lin Y; Tian J; Shi D; Cheng J; Haacke EM; Hong X; Ma B; Zhou J; Wang M
Radiology; 2016 Feb; 278(2):496-504. PubMed ID: 26230975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histogram analysis of stretched-exponential and monoexponential diffusion-weighted imaging models for distinguishing low and intermediate/high gleason scores in prostate carcinoma.
Liu W; Liu XH; Tang W; Gao HB; Zhou BN; Zhou LP
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Aug; 48(2):491-498. PubMed ID: 29412492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diffusion-weighted imaging of rectal cancer on repeatability and cancer characterization: an effect of b-value distribution study.
Chen L; Shen F; Li Z; Lu H; Chen Y; Wang Z; Lu J
Cancer Imaging; 2018 Nov; 18(1):43. PubMed ID: 30442202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer.
Wang Q; Li H; Yan X; Wu CJ; Liu XS; Shi HB; Zhang YD
Urol Oncol; 2015 Aug; 33(8):337.e15-24. PubMed ID: 26048104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Combined With DWI at 3-T MRI for Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness of Prostate Cancer.
Wang X; Tu N; Qin T; Xing F; Wang P; Wu G
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Oct; 211(4):797-804. PubMed ID: 30085835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
