244 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26220916)
1. Can imaging criteria distinguish enchondroma from grade 1 chondrosarcoma?
Crim J; Schmidt R; Layfield L; Hanrahan C; Manaster BJ
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Nov; 84(11):2222-30. PubMed ID: 26220916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. What are the differentiating clinical and MRI-features of enchondromas from low-grade chondrosarcomas?
Douis H; Parry M; Vaiyapuri S; Davies AM
Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):398-409. PubMed ID: 28695356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for differentiation between enchondroma and chondrosarcoma.
De Coninck T; Jans L; Sys G; Huysse W; Verstraeten T; Forsyth R; Poffyn B; Verstraete K
Eur Radiol; 2013 Nov; 23(11):3140-52. PubMed ID: 23771600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic value of MRI-based 3D texture analysis for tissue characterisation and discrimination of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma: a pilot study.
Lisson CS; Lisson CG; Flosdorf K; Mayer-Steinacker R; Schultheiss M; von Baer A; Barth TFE; Beer AJ; Baumhauer M; Meier R; Beer M; Schmidt SA
Eur Radiol; 2018 Feb; 28(2):468-477. PubMed ID: 28884356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Enchondroma versus chondrosarcoma in the appendicular skeleton: differentiating features.
Murphey MD; Flemming DJ; Boyea SR; Bojescul JA; Sweet DE; Temple HT
Radiographics; 1998; 18(5):1213-37; quiz 1244-5. PubMed ID: 9747616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Differentiating clinical and radiographic features of enchondroma and secondary chondrosarcoma in the foot.
Gajewski DA; Burnette JB; Murphey MD; Temple HT
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):240-4. PubMed ID: 16624212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How safe is curettage of low-grade cartilaginous neoplasms diagnosed by imaging with or without pre-operative needle biopsy?
Brown MT; Gikas PD; Bhamra JS; Skinner JA; Aston WJ; Pollock RC; Saifuddin A; Briggs TW
Bone Joint J; 2014 Aug; 96-B(8):1098-105. PubMed ID: 25086127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Radiographic Enchondroma Surveillance: Assessing Clinical Outcomes and Costs Effectiveness.
Akoh CC; Craig E; Troester AM; Miller BJ
Iowa Orthop J; 2019; 39(1):185-193. PubMed ID: 31413693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MR differentiation of low-grade chondrosarcoma from enchondroma.
Choi BB; Jee WH; Sunwoo HJ; Cho JH; Kim JY; Chun KA; Hong SJ; Chung HW; Sung MS; Lee YS; Chung YG
Clin Imaging; 2013; 37(3):542-7. PubMed ID: 23041161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Overutilization and Cost of Advanced Imaging for Long-Bone Cartilaginous Lesions.
Wilson RJ; Zumsteg JW; Hartley KA; Long JH; Mesko NW; Halpern JL; Schwartz HS; Holt GE
Ann Surg Oncol; 2015 Oct; 22(11):3466-73. PubMed ID: 25564171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Concurrent periosteal chondroma and enchondroma of the fibula mimicking chondrosarcoma.
Yamamoto Y; Washimi O; Yamada H; Washimi Y; Itoh M; Kuroda M
Skeletal Radiol; 2006 May; 35(5):302-5. PubMed ID: 16421751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiographic differentiation of enchondroma from low-grade chondrosarcoma in the fibula.
Kendell SD; Collins MS; Adkins MC; Sundaram M; Unni KK
Skeletal Radiol; 2004 Aug; 33(8):458-66. PubMed ID: 15221215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low-grade chondrosarcoma vs enchondroma: challenges in diagnosis and management.
Wang XL; De Beuckeleer LH; De Schepper AM; Van Marck E
Eur Radiol; 2001; 11(6):1054-7. PubMed ID: 11419152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Concurrent enchondroma and periosteal chondroma of the humerus mimicking chondrosarcoma.
Ishida T; Iijima T; Goto T; Kawano H; Machinami R
Skeletal Radiol; 1998 Jun; 27(6):337-40. PubMed ID: 9677652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of radiography in differentiating enchondroma from central grade 1 chondrosarcoma.
Geirnaerdt MJ; Hermans J; Bloem JL; Kroon HM; Pope TL; Taminiau AH; Hogendoorn PC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1097-104. PubMed ID: 9308471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of interobserver variability and histologic parameters to improve reliability in classification and grading of central cartilaginous tumors.
Eefting D; Schrage YM; Geirnaerdt MJ; Le Cessie S; Taminiau AH; Bovée JV; Hogendoorn PC;
Am J Surg Pathol; 2009 Jan; 33(1):50-7. PubMed ID: 18852676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic resonance imaging of cartilaginous tumors: a retrospective study of 79 patients.
De Beuckeleer LH; De Schepper AM; Ramon F; Somville J
Eur J Radiol; 1995 Nov; 21(1):34-40. PubMed ID: 8654456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. MRI differentiation of low-grade from high-grade appendicular chondrosarcoma.
Douis H; Singh L; Saifuddin A
Eur Radiol; 2014 Jan; 24(1):232-40. PubMed ID: 24337911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Chondrosarcoma of the ring finger: a case report and review of the literature.
Hatori M; Watanabe M; Kotake H; Kokubun S
Tohoku J Exp Med; 2006 Mar; 208(3):275-81. PubMed ID: 16498237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Malignant transformation of an enchondroma of the hand: a case report.
Ozcanli H; Alimoglu E; Aydin AT
Hand Surg; 2011; 16(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 21548161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
