174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2622112)
1. [Study of the late results of reimplantation of heart valve prostheses based on 15-year experience].
Listewnik MJ; Jegaden O; Bonnefoy JY; Rumolo A; Coll-Mazzei J; Devolfe C; Mikaeloff P
Kardiol Pol; 1989; 32(4):216-24. PubMed ID: 2622112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Rubens FD; Bédard P; Masters RG; Pipe AL; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Mar; 25(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 15019662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Aortic and mitral valve replacement with the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis: 10-year results.
Murakami T; Eishi K; Nakano S; Kobayashi J; Sasako Y; Isobe F; Kosakai Y; Kito Y; Kawashima Y
J Heart Valve Dis; 1996 Jan; 5(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8834725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Early and late outcome after reoperation for prosthetic valve dysfunction: analysis of 549 patients during a 26-year period.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Mossuto E; Mazzaro E; Thiene G; Casarotto D
J Heart Valve Dis; 1994 Jan; 3(1):81-7. PubMed ID: 8162223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical evaluation of the carbomedics prosthesis: experience at providence health system in Portland.
Minakata K; Wu Y; Zerr KJ; Grunkemeier GL; Handy JR; Ahmad A; Starr A; Furnary AP
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Nov; 11(6):844-50. PubMed ID: 12479287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
Joyce LD; Nelson RM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of valve-related complications in patients with Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis: a seven-year experience.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; D'Alfonso A; Piccin C; Mecozzi G; Magagna P; Fabbri A; Mazzucco A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):795-801. PubMed ID: 11767189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Long-term outcomes of valve replacement with modern prostheses in young adults.
Ruel M; Kulik A; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Bédard P; Mesana TG
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2005 Mar; 27(3):425-33; discussion 433. PubMed ID: 15740951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Seven-year results with the St Jude Medical Silzone mechanical prosthesis.
Jamieson WR; Fradet GJ; Abel JG; Janusz MT; Lichtenstein SV; MacNab JS; Stanford EA; Chan F
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 May; 137(5):1109-15.e2. PubMed ID: 19379975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aortic and mitral valve replacement in children: is there any role for biologic and bioprosthetic substitutes?
Alsoufi B; Manlhiot C; McCrindle BW; Canver CC; Sallehuddin A; Al-Oufi S; Joufan M; Al-Halees Z
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jul; 36(1):84-90; discussion 90. PubMed ID: 19369085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seventeen-year experience with the St. Jude medical biocor porcine bioprosthesis.
Mykén PS
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):486-92. PubMed ID: 16116875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Bioprosthesis degeneration in the aortic and mitral valve position. Results and problems from the cardiosurgical viewpoint].
Antretter H; Cottogni M; Falbesoner C; Furtwängler W; Mair P; Falk M; Hutter J
Wien Med Wochenschr; 1993; 143(11):281-7. PubMed ID: 8212714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Effect of prosthetic heart valve replacement on the natural course of isolated mitral and aortic as well as multivalvular diseases. Clinical results in 783 patients up to 8 years following implantation of the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis].
Horstkotte D; Loogen F; Kleikamp G; Schulte HD; Trampisch HJ; Bircks W
Z Kardiol; 1983 Sep; 72(9):494-503. PubMed ID: 6636932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Indications for reoperation for valvular prosthesis dysfunction in urgent and elective patients.
Sadowski J; Kapelak B; Wróbel K; Piatek J; Rudziński P; Wierzbicki K; Marek G; Drwiła R; Sobczyk D; Grudzień G
Przegl Lek; 2004; 61(6):585-8. PubMed ID: 15724640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
