174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2622112)
21. Long-term experience with the omniscience cardiac valve.
Teijeira FJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):540-7. PubMed ID: 9793854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Twenty-year comparison of tissue and mechanical valve replacement.
Khan SS; Trento A; DeRobertis M; Kass RM; Sandhu M; Czer LS; Blanche C; Raissi S; Fontana GP; Cheng W; Chaux A; Matloff JM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2001 Aug; 122(2):257-69. PubMed ID: 11479498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Comparative evaluation of various methods of treatment of mitral valve diseases. Apropos of 4 series of 100 patients operated on using the Starr prosthesis, Bjork prosthesis, bioprosthesis and valve reconstruction].
Perier P; Deloche A; Rossand P; Fabiani JN; Bessou JP; Bourezak H; Chachques JC; d'Allaines C; Blondeau P; Carpentier A
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1984 Dec; 77(13):1517-24. PubMed ID: 6440502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The St. Jude Medical bileaflet valve prosthesis. A 5 year experience.
Chaux A; Czer LS; Matloff JM; DeRobertis MA; Stewart ME; Bateman TM; Kass RM; Lee ME; Gray RJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):706-17. PubMed ID: 6492839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Follow-up of isolated aortic valve prosthesis, 1964-86.
Katz A; Fraser D; Weitzman S; Gueron M
Isr J Med Sci; 1989 Oct; 25(10):564-7. PubMed ID: 2807855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Four years' experience with the Edwards-Tekna bileaflet valve prosthesis.
Calkavur T; Yagdi T; Apaydin A; Islamoglu F; Posacioglu H; Durmaz I; Ozbaran M
J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Mar; 11(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 12000170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simultaneous aortic and mitral valve replacement: predictors of adverse outcome.
Kuwaki K; Tsukamoto M; Komatsu K; Morishita K; Sakata J; Abe T
J Heart Valve Dis; 2003 Mar; 12(2):169-76. PubMed ID: 12701788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
Nashef SA; Sethia B; Turner MA; Davidson KG; Lewis S; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time.
Gersak B; Sutlic Z
Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Multiple valve surgery with beating heart technique.
Ricci M; Macedo FI; Suarez MR; Brown M; Alba J; Salerno TA
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Feb; 87(2):527-31. PubMed ID: 19161773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Valve replacement in the elderly. Is the mechanical valve a good alternative?
Antunes MJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Oct; 98(4):485-91. PubMed ID: 2796355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Late results after left-sided cardiac valve replacement in children.
Milano A; Vouhé PR; Baillot-Vernant F; Donzeau-Gouge P; Trinquet F; Roux PM; Leca F; Neveux JY
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 92(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 3736079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcome after aortic valve replacement: comparison of homografts with mechanical prostheses.
Kilian E; Oberhoffer M; Kaczmarek I; Bauerfeind D; Kreuzer E; Reichart B
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jul; 16(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 17702366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Experience with low-dose aspirin as thromboprophylaxis for the Tissuemed porcine aortic bioprosthesis: a survey of five years' experience.
Goldsmith I; Lip GY; Mukundan S; Rosin MD
J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Sep; 7(5):574-9. PubMed ID: 9793859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?
Kumar P; Athanasiou T; Ali A; Nair S; Oz BS; DeSouza A; Moat N; Shore DF; Pepper JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Biological versus mechanical valves. Analysis of 1,116 valves inserted in 1,012 adult patients with a 4,818 patient-year and a 5,327 valve-year follow-up.
Hammond GL; Geha AS; Kopf GS; Hashim SW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Feb; 93(2):182-98. PubMed ID: 3807394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Outcomes of double valve surgery for active infective endocarditis.
Sheikh AM; Elhenawy AM; Maganti M; Armstrong S; David TE; Feindel CM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2009 Jul; 138(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 19577059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Clinical evaluation of the St. Jude Medical heart valve prosthesis. A two-year follow-up of 150 patients.
Burckhardt D; Hoffmann A; Vogt S; Pfisterer M; Hasse J; Grädel E
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Sep; 88(3):432-8. PubMed ID: 6471892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
