274 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26221668)
21. Improving reliability of subject-level resting-state fMRI parcellation with shrinkage estimators.
Mejia AF; Nebel MB; Shou H; Crainiceanu CM; Pekar JJ; Mostofsky S; Caffo B; Lindquist MA
Neuroimage; 2015 May; 112():14-29. PubMed ID: 25731998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A blind deconvolution approach to recover effective connectivity brain networks from resting state fMRI data.
Wu GR; Liao W; Stramaglia S; Ding JR; Chen H; Marinazzo D
Med Image Anal; 2013 Apr; 17(3):365-74. PubMed ID: 23422254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Agreement between functional connectivity and cortical thickness-driven correlation maps of the medial frontal cortex.
Park H; Park YH; Cha J; Seo SW; Na DL; Lee JM
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0171803. PubMed ID: 28328993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Single-subject structural networks with closed-form rotation invariant matching mprove power in developmental studies of the cortex.
Kandel BM; Wang DJ; Gee JC; Avants BB
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 3):137-44. PubMed ID: 25320792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Simpson's paradox and fMRI: Similarities and differences between functional connectivity measures derived from within-subject and across-subject correlations.
Roberts RP; Hach S; Tippett LJ; Addis DR
Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():1-15. PubMed ID: 27101735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. A SVM-based quantitative fMRI method for resting-state functional network detection.
Song X; Chen NK
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Sep; 32(7):819-31. PubMed ID: 24928301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Human brain mapping: A systematic comparison of parcellation methods for the human cerebral cortex.
Arslan S; Ktena SI; Makropoulos A; Robinson EC; Rueckert D; Parisot S
Neuroimage; 2018 Apr; 170():5-30. PubMed ID: 28412442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Local-Global Parcellation of the Human Cerebral Cortex from Intrinsic Functional Connectivity MRI.
Schaefer A; Kong R; Gordon EM; Laumann TO; Zuo XN; Holmes AJ; Eickhoff SB; Yeo BTT
Cereb Cortex; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3095-3114. PubMed ID: 28981612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Brain parcellation driven by dynamic functional connectivity better capture intrinsic network dynamics.
Fan L; Zhong Q; Qin J; Li N; Su J; Zeng LL; Hu D; Shen H
Hum Brain Mapp; 2021 Apr; 42(5):1416-1433. PubMed ID: 33283954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A depression network of functionally connected regions discovered via multi-attribute canonical correlation graphs.
Kang J; Bowman FD; Mayberg H; Liu H
Neuroimage; 2016 Nov; 141():431-441. PubMed ID: 27474522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Brain connectivity hyper-network for MCI classification.
Jie B; Shen D; Zhang D
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2014; 17(Pt 2):724-32. PubMed ID: 25485444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Group-wise consistent parcellation of gyri via adaptive multi-view spectral clustering of fiber shapes.
Chen H; Cai X; Zhu D; Nie F; Liu T; Huang H
Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2012; 15(Pt 2):271-9. PubMed ID: 23286058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Functional connectivity and structural covariance between regions of interest can be measured more accurately using multivariate distance correlation.
Geerligs L; Cam-Can ; Henson RN
Neuroimage; 2016 Jul; 135():16-31. PubMed ID: 27114055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Individual-Specific Areal-Level Parcellations Improve Functional Connectivity Prediction of Behavior.
Kong R; Yang Q; Gordon E; Xue A; Yan X; Orban C; Zuo XN; Spreng N; Ge T; Holmes A; Eickhoff S; Yeo BTT
Cereb Cortex; 2021 Aug; 31(10):4477-4500. PubMed ID: 33942058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The effect of scan length on the reliability of resting-state fMRI connectivity estimates.
Birn RM; Molloy EK; Patriat R; Parker T; Meier TB; Kirk GR; Nair VA; Meyerand ME; Prabhakaran V
Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():550-8. PubMed ID: 23747458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Combining spatial independent component analysis with regression to identify the subcortical components of resting-state FMRI functional networks.
Malherbe C; Messé A; Bardinet E; Pélégrini-Issac M; Perlbarg V; Marrelec G; Worbe Y; Yelnik J; Lehéricy S; Benali H
Brain Connect; 2014 Apr; 4(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 24575752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Integration of resting-state FMRI and diffusion-weighted MRI connectivity analyses of the human brain: limitations and improvement.
Zhu DC; Majumdar S
J Neuroimaging; 2014; 24(2):176-86. PubMed ID: 23279672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Optimizing Connectivity-Driven Brain Parcellation Using Ensemble Clustering.
Kurmukov A; Mussabaeva A; Denisova Y; Moyer D; Jahanshad N; Thompson PM; Gutman BA
Brain Connect; 2020 May; 10(4):183-194. PubMed ID: 32264696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identifying patients with Alzheimer's disease using resting-state fMRI and graph theory.
Khazaee A; Ebrahimzadeh A; Babajani-Feremi A
Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Nov; 126(11):2132-41. PubMed ID: 25907414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Individual parcellation of resting fMRI with a group functional connectivity prior.
Chong M; Bhushan C; Joshi AA; Choi S; Haldar JP; Shattuck DW; Spreng RN; Leahy RM
Neuroimage; 2017 Aug; 156():87-100. PubMed ID: 28478226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
