These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26221762)

  • 1. Upscaling Point Velocity Measurements to Characterize a Glacial Outwash Aquifer.
    Schillig PC; Devlin JF; Rudolph D
    Ground Water; 2016 May; 54(3):394-405. PubMed ID: 26221762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Applications and implications of direct groundwater velocity measurement at the centimetre scale.
    Devlin JF; Schillig PC; Bowen I; Critchley CE; Rudolph DL; Thomson NR; Tsoflias GP; Roberts JA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2012 Jan; 127(1-4):3-14. PubMed ID: 21890231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity analyses of the theoretical equations used in point velocity probe (PVP) data interpretation.
    Devlin JF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2016 Sep; 192():140-145. PubMed ID: 27454892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Groundwater flow velocities in a fractured carbonate aquifer-type: Implications for contaminant transport.
    Medici G; West LJ; Banwart SA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2019 Apr; 222():1-16. PubMed ID: 30795856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Design, testing, and implementation of a real-time system for monitoring flow in horizontal wells.
    Cormican A; Devlin JF; Osorno TC; Divine C
    J Contam Hydrol; 2021 Mar; 238():103772. PubMed ID: 33545531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Measurements of groundwater velocity in discrete rock fractures.
    Novakowski K; Bickerton G; Lapcevic P; Voralek J; Ross N
    J Contam Hydrol; 2006 Jan; 82(1-2):44-60. PubMed ID: 16239047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of multiple tracer methods to estimate low groundwater flow velocities.
    Reimus PW; Arnold BW
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Apr; 199():1-13. PubMed ID: 28262572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validation of a new device to quantify groundwater-surface water exchange.
    Cremeans MM; Devlin JF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2017 Nov; 206():75-80. PubMed ID: 29050851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimates of Horizontal Groundwater Flow Velocities in Boreholes.
    Bayer-Raich M; Credoz A; Guimerà J; Jordana S; Sampietro D; Font-Capó J; Nief N; Grossemy M
    Ground Water; 2019 Jul; 57(4):525-533. PubMed ID: 30105834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Prediction of post-Darcy flow based on the spatial non-local distribution of hydraulic gradient: Preliminary assessment of wastewater management.
    Wang X; Qian J; Ma H; Ma L; Zhou D; Sun H
    Chemosphere; 2023 Sep; 334():139013. PubMed ID: 37224972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An improved technology for monitoring groundwater flow velocity and direction in fractured rock system based on colloidal particles motion.
    Hu F; Huang CS; Han JH; Huang W; Li X; Hou BQ; Akram W; Li L; Liu XH; Chen W; Zhao ZL; Zhan J; Xu LS; Shan H; Li XZ; Han WJ; Yin ZB; Wang ZZ; Xiao TF
    Sci Rep; 2024 Apr; 14(1):7685. PubMed ID: 38561405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Groundwater flow velocities in karst aquifers; importance of spatial observation scale and hydraulic testing for contaminant transport prediction.
    Medici G; West LJ
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Aug; 28(32):43050-43063. PubMed ID: 34125385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Use of tandem circulation wells to measure hydraulic conductivity without groundwater extraction.
    Goltz MN; Huang J; Close ME; Flintoft MJ; Pang L
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Sep; 100(3-4):127-36. PubMed ID: 18674844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Improving estimates of groundwater velocity in a fractured rock borehole using hydraulic and tracer dilution methods.
    Maldaner CH; Quinn PM; Cherry JA; Parker BL
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jul; 214():75-86. PubMed ID: 29907430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Laboratory validation of a point velocity probe for measuring horizontal flow from any direction.
    Gibson B; Devlin JF
    J Contam Hydrol; 2018 Jan; 208():10-16. PubMed ID: 29167020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Use of steady-state hydraulic tomography to inform the selection of a chaotic advection system.
    Cho MS; Zhao Z; Thomson NR; Illman WA
    J Contam Hydrol; 2020 Feb; 229():103559. PubMed ID: 31784037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Studies of water velocity in the capillary fringe: the point velocity probe.
    Berg SJ; Gillham RW
    Ground Water; 2010; 48(1):59-67. PubMed ID: 19664049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. On-line groundwater velocity probe: laboratory testing and field evaluation.
    Patterson BM; Annable MD; Bekele EB; Furness AJ
    J Contam Hydrol; 2010 Sep; 117(1-4):109-18. PubMed ID: 20716466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of small-scale low and high permeability layers using single well forced-gradient tracer tests: fluorescent dye imaging and modelling at the laboratory-scale.
    Barns GL; Thornton SF; Wilson RD
    J Contam Hydrol; 2015 Jan; 172():84-99. PubMed ID: 25478669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new tracer technique for monitoring groundwater fluxes: the Finite Volume Point Dilution Method.
    Brouyère S; Batlle-Aguilar J; Goderniaux P; Dassargues A
    J Contam Hydrol; 2008 Jan; 95(3-4):121-40. PubMed ID: 17949849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.