280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26221855)
1. Improved Construction of Auricular Prosthesis by Digital Technologies.
Nuseir A; Hatamleh M; Watson J; Al-Wahadni AM; Alzoubi F; Murad M
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):e502-5. PubMed ID: 26221855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Construction of an implant-retained auricular prosthesis with the aid of contemporary digital technologies: a clinical report.
Hatamleh MM; Watson J
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):132-6. PubMed ID: 22947024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Complete integration of technology for improved reproduction of auricular prostheses.
Watson J; Hatamleh MM
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 May; 111(5):430-6. PubMed ID: 24445032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Direct 3D Printing of Flexible Nasal Prosthesis: Optimized Digital Workflow from Scan to Fit.
Nuseir A; Hatamleh MM; Alnazzawi A; Al-Rabab'ah M; Kamel B; Jaradat E
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 30461125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digitally designed surgical guides for placing extraoral implants in the mastoid area.
Van der Meer WJ; Vissink A; Raghoebar GM; Visser A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):703-7. PubMed ID: 22616066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prosthesis-guided implant restoration of an auricular defect using computed tomography and 3-dimensional photographic imaging technologies: a clinical report.
Wang S; Leng X; Zheng Y; Zhang D; Wu G
J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):152-6. PubMed ID: 25444284
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Planning implant positions for an auricular prosthesis with digital data.
Reitemeier B; Schöne C; Schreiber S; Stockmann F; Ullmann K; Eckelt U
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):128-31. PubMed ID: 22304747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Modified technique for retaining silicone auricular prosthesis: a case report.
Nelogi SY; Chandrashekhar NH; Porwal A; Guttal SS
Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 19(2):62-6. PubMed ID: 21780728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Three-dimensional printing technologies in the fabrication of maxillofacial prosthesis: A case report.
Cevik P; Kocacikli M
Int J Artif Organs; 2020 May; 43(5):343-347. PubMed ID: 31739725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of rapid prototyping in prosthetic auricular restoration.
Turgut G; Sacak B; Kiran K; Bas L
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Mar; 20(2):321-5. PubMed ID: 19276832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Osseointegrated implants and auricular defects: a case series study.
Wright RF; Zemnick C; Wazen JJ; Asher E
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 18544137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: an assessment of implant success and prosthetic complications.
Aydin C; Karakoca S; Yilmaz H; Yilmaz C
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 18548964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fully digital workflow for ear defect rehabilitation with an immediate implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
Wei H; Bi Y; Li M; Bai S
J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Jun; 131(6):1259-1263. PubMed ID: 35610085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of congenital auricular defect: a clinical report.
Shrestha B; Fatmasari F; Thaworanunta S; Srithavaj T
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2015 Mar; 52(2):229-33. PubMed ID: 25714270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retrospective study of treatment outcomes with implant-retained extraoral prostheses: survival rates and prosthetic complications.
Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):118-26. PubMed ID: 20141816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A two-step functional impression technique for the fabrication of an implant-retained silicone auricular prosthesis.
Waqas TS; Shrestha B; Srithavaj ML; Chotprasert N
J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Mar; 117(3):444-447. PubMed ID: 27677216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The use of cephalometric landmarks with 3-dimensional volumetric computer modeling to position an auricular implant surgical template: a clinical report.
Kolodney H; Swedenburg G; Taylor SS; Carron JD; Schlakman BN
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Nov; 106(5):284-9. PubMed ID: 22024177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted placement of craniofacial implants.
Klein M; Hein A; Lueth T; Bier J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(5):712-8. PubMed ID: 14579960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Integration of digital technology in the workflow for an osseointegrated implant-retained nasal prosthesis: A clinical report.
McHutchion L; Kincade C; Wolfaardt J
J Prosthet Dent; 2019 May; 121(5):858-862. PubMed ID: 30782455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-Specific Implant in Prosthetic Craniofacial Reconstruction: First Report of a Novel Technique With Far-Reaching Perspective.
Toso SM; Menzel K; Motzkus Y; Adolphs N; Hoffmeister B; Raguse JD
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 26(7):2133-5. PubMed ID: 26468797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
