These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26222946)

  • 21. Quality of life, self-perceived dysphonia, and diagnosed dysphonia through clinical tests in teachers.
    Bassi IB; Assunção AÁ; de Medeiros AM; de Menezes LN; Teixeira LC; Côrtes Gama AC
    J Voice; 2011 Mar; 25(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 20202785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Study on the stability of perceptual evaluation of voice quality].
    Wang G; Yu P; Xu W; Wen W; Wei CS; Huang DY; Hou LZ
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2011 Jun; 46(6):485-90. PubMed ID: 21924100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Computer-Based Tool for the Assessment of Voice Quality Through Visual Analogue Scales: VAS-Simplified Vocal Profile Analysis.
    San Segundo E; Skarnitzl R
    J Voice; 2021 May; 35(3):497.e9-497.e21. PubMed ID: 31727412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Voice, speech, and laryngeal features of primary Sjögren's syndrome.
    Heller A; Tanner K; Roy N; Nissen SL; Merrill RM; Miller KL; Houtz DR; Ellerston J; Kendall K
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2014 Nov; 123(11):778-85. PubMed ID: 24944270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample.
    Law T; Kim JH; Lee KY; Tang EC; Lam JH; van Hasselt AC; Tong MC
    J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Borg scale: a new method for hypernasality rating.
    Ramos-Favaretto FS; Fukushiro AP; Scarmagnani RH; Yamashita RP
    Codas; 2019; 31(6):e20180296. PubMed ID: 31800882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of synthesized voice anchors on auditory-perceptual voice evaluation.
    Santos PCMD; Vieira MN; Sansão JPH; Gama ACC
    Codas; 2021; 33(1):e20190197. PubMed ID: 33950146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Coping strategies in teachers with vocal complaint.
    Zambon F; Moreti F; Behlau M
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):341-8. PubMed ID: 24495425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Student training to perceptually assess severity of dysphonia using the dysphonic severity percentage scale.
    Schaeffer N
    J Voice; 2013 Sep; 27(5):611-6. PubMed ID: 23876942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Translation and validation of a French version of the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS)].
    Favre S; Aubry JM; Gex-Fabry M; Ragama-Pardos E; McQuillan A; Bertschy G
    Encephale; 2003; 29(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 15029084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Quantifying the cepstral peak prominence, a measure of dysphonia.
    Heman-Ackah YD; Sataloff RT; Laureyns G; Lurie D; Michael DD; Heuer R; Rubin A; Eller R; Chandran S; Abaza M; Lyons K; Divi V; Lott J; Johnson J; Hillenbrand J
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):783-8. PubMed ID: 25179777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Perceptual structure of adductor spasmodic dysphonia and its acoustic correlates.
    Cannito MP; Doiuchi M; Murry T; Woodson GE
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):818.e5-13. PubMed ID: 23177751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dysphonia risk screening protocol.
    Nemr K; Simões-Zenari M; Duarte JM; Lobrigate KE; Bagatini FA
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2016 Mar; 71(3):114-27. PubMed ID: 27074171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive value and discriminant capacity of cepstral- and spectral-based measures during continuous speech.
    Lowell SY; Colton RH; Kelley RT; Mizia SA
    J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):393-400. PubMed ID: 23684735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice.
    Zraick RI; Wendel K; Smith-Olinde L
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 16301103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Consensus Auditory-Perceptual Evaluation of Voice (CAPE-V).
    Mozzanica F; Ginocchio D; Borghi E; Bachmann C; Schindler A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2013; 65(5):257-65. PubMed ID: 24714558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Risk of dysphonia and voice quality in performing arts students.
    Ferrari EP; Simões-Zenari M; Master S; Nemr K
    Codas; 2023; 35(4):e20220036. PubMed ID: 37610967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The phonatory deviation diagram: a novel objective measurement of vocal function.
    Madazio G; Leão S; Behlau M
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(6):305-11. PubMed ID: 21625144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessing the effectiveness of botulinum toxin injections for adductor spasmodic dysphonia: clinician and patient perception.
    Braden MN; Johns MM; Klein AM; Delgaudio JM; Gilman M; Hapner ER
    J Voice; 2010 Mar; 24(2):242-9. PubMed ID: 19481417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.