278 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26222947)
21. Discriminant capacity of acoustic, perceptual, and vocal self: the effects of vocal demands.
Côrtes Gama AC; Camargo Z; Rocha Santos MA; Carlos Rusilo L
J Voice; 2015 Mar; 29(2):260.e45-50. PubMed ID: 25499524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Vocal self-assessment: relation with the type of instrument, gender, age, and profession in individuals without vocal complaints.
Dassie-Leite AP; Delazeri S; Baldissarelli B; Weber J; Lacerda Filho Ld
Codas; 2014; 26(6):531-4. PubMed ID: 25590917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Drama students with and without vocal complaint: vocal health and hygiene data, symptoms and voice handicap.
Cruz MRDSA; Yamasaki R; Pacheco C; Borrego MCM; Behlau M
Codas; 2019; 31(5):e20180319. PubMed ID: 31691747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Occupational voice complaints and objective acoustic measurements-do they correlate?
Lehto L; Laaksonen L; Vilkman E; Alku P
Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2006; 31(4):147-52. PubMed ID: 17114126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Perceptual, auditory and acoustic vocal analysis of speech and singing in choir conductors.
Rehder MI; Behlau M
Pro Fono; 2008; 20(3):195-200. PubMed ID: 18852968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Relationship between patient-perceived vocal handicap and clinician-rated level of vocal dysfunction.
Childs LF; Bielinski C; Toles L; Hamilton A; Deane J; Mau T
Laryngoscope; 2015 Jan; 125(1):180-5. PubMed ID: 25123059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Impact of Double Source of Vibration Semioccluded Voice Exercises on Objective and Subjective Outcomes in Subjects with Voice Complaints.
Guzman M; Acuña G; Pacheco F; Peralta F; Romero C; Vergara C; Quezada C
J Voice; 2018 Nov; 32(6):770.e1-770.e9. PubMed ID: 29273232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Condition of Vocal Production-Teacher questionnaire: comparison of responses on Likert scale and visual analog scale.
Giannini SP; Latorre Mdo R; Ferreira LP
Codas; 2016; 28(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 27074190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Clinical voice analysis of Carnatic singers.
Arunachalam R; Boominathan P; Mahalingam S
J Voice; 2014 Jan; 28(1):128.e1-128.e9. PubMed ID: 24275462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of subjective assessment of voice disorders and objective voice measurement.
Hanschmann H; Lohmann A; Berger R
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2011; 63(2):83-7. PubMed ID: 20938187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Effects of antituberculosis treatment on self assessment, perceptual analysis and acoustic analysis of voice quality in laryngeal tuberculosis patients.
Yelken K; Guven M; Topak M; Gultekin E; Turan F
J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Apr; 122(4):378-82. PubMed ID: 17592656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Factors predicting patient perception of dysphonia caused by benign vocal fold lesions.
Behrman A; Sulica L; He T
Laryngoscope; 2004 Oct; 114(10):1693-700. PubMed ID: 15454756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Vocal problems of group fitness instructors: prevalence of self-reported sensory and auditory-perceptual voice symptoms and the need for preventative education and training.
Rumbach AF
J Voice; 2013 Jul; 27(4):524.e11-21. PubMed ID: 23490132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The impact of extended voice use on the acoustic characteristics of phonation after training and performance of actors from the La MaMa Experimental Theater club.
Ferrone C; Galgano J; Ramig LO
J Voice; 2011 May; 25(3):e123-37. PubMed ID: 20381306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Acoustic and perceptual indicators of normal and pathological voice.
Muñoz J; Mendoza E; Fresneda MD; Carballo G; López P
Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2003; 55(2):102-14. PubMed ID: 12697983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Voice Changes in Real Speaking Situations During a Day, With and Without Vocal Loading: Assessing Call Center Operators.
Ben-David BM; Icht M
J Voice; 2016 Mar; 30(2):247.e1-11. PubMed ID: 26320758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Severity of voice disorders in children: correlations between perceptual and acoustic data.
Lopes LW; Barbosa Lima IL; Alves Almeida LN; Cavalcante DP; de Almeida AA
J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):819.e7-12. PubMed ID: 23177753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [On the auditory evaluation of voice quality].
Ptok M; Schwemmle C; Iven C; Jessen M; Nawka T
HNO; 2006 Oct; 54(10):793-802. PubMed ID: 16132879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Immediate post-operative vocal changes in patients using laryngeal mask airway versus endotracheal tube.
Hamdan AL; Kanazi G; Rameh C; Rifai H; Sibai A
J Laryngol Otol; 2008 Aug; 122(8):829-35. PubMed ID: 17617935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Differences in self-rated, perceived, and acoustic voice qualities between high- and low-fatigue groups.
Cho SW; Yin CS; Park YB; Park YJ
J Voice; 2011 Sep; 25(5):544-52. PubMed ID: 21051198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
