These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26223150)

  • 41. Source-constrained retrieval and survival processing.
    Nairne JS; Pandeirada JN; VanArsdall JE; Blunt JR
    Mem Cognit; 2015 Jan; 43(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 25092224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Are animacy effects in episodic memory independent of encoding instructions?
    Gelin M; Bugaiska A; Méot A; Bonin P
    Memory; 2017 Jan; 25(1):2-18. PubMed ID: 26642740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. II. PET studies of memory: novel versus practiced free recall of word lists.
    Andreasen NC; O'Leary DS; Cizadlo T; Arndt S; Rezai K; Watkins GL; Ponto LL; Hichwa RD
    Neuroimage; 1995 Dec; 2(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 9343614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. An item gains and losses analysis of false memories suggests critical items receive more item-specific processing than list items.
    Burns DJ; Martens NJ; Bertoni AA; Sweeney EJ; Lividini MD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Mar; 32(2):277-89. PubMed ID: 16569146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Different brain activities predict retrieval success during emotional and semantic encoding.
    Padovani T; Koenig T; Brandeis D; Perrig WJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Dec; 23(12):4008-21. PubMed ID: 21812556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The role of age of acquisition in memory: effects on judgements of learning and recall.
    Illman NA; Morrison CM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Sep; 64(9):1665-71. PubMed ID: 21838653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Limits of the retrieval-inhibition construct: list segregation in directed forgetting.
    Wilson SP; Kipp K; Chapman K
    J Gen Psychol; 2003 Oct; 130(4):359-79. PubMed ID: 14672100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effects of repeated collaborative retrieval on individual memory vary as a function of recall versus recognition tasks.
    Blumen HM; Rajaram S
    Memory; 2009 Nov; 17(8):840-6. PubMed ID: 19882435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Adaptive memory: stereotype activation is not enough.
    Otgaar H; Smeets T; Merckelbach H; Jelicic M; Verschuere B; Galliot AM; van Riel L
    Mem Cognit; 2011 Aug; 39(6):1033-41. PubMed ID: 21445705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. My word! Interference from reading object names implies a role for competition during picture name retrieval.
    Vitkovitch M; Cooper E
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(6):1229-40. PubMed ID: 22390174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Differentiating between verbal and spatial encoding using eye-movement recordings.
    Lange EB; Engbert R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013 Sep; 66(9):1840-57. PubMed ID: 23472620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. On the susceptibility of adaptive memory to false memory illusions.
    Howe ML; Derbish MH
    Cognition; 2010 May; 115(2):252-67. PubMed ID: 20096406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. On the nature of the relationship between processing activity and item retention in children.
    Towse JN; Hitch GJ; Hutton U
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Jun; 82(2):156-84. PubMed ID: 12083794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Mood-congruent attention and memory bias in dysphoria: Exploring the coherence among information-processing biases.
    Koster EH; De Raedt R; Leyman L; De Lissnyder E
    Behav Res Ther; 2010 Mar; 48(3):219-25. PubMed ID: 19945095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Retrieval-induced forgetting in item recognition: evidence for a reduction in general memory strength.
    Spitzer B; Bäuml KH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Sep; 33(5):863-75. PubMed ID: 17723065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Survival processing eliminates collaborative inhibition.
    Reysen MB; Bliss H; Baker MA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Jun; 71(6):1340-1347. PubMed ID: 28398121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Memory retrieval as a self-propagating process.
    Bäuml KH; Schlichting A
    Cognition; 2014 Jul; 132(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 24727424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Intentional updating in episodic memory: Low testosterone associates with enhanced memory updating.
    Sterzer L; Schabus M; Bäuml KH; Kerschbaum HH
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2015; 36(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 26313383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Gummed-up memory: chewing gum impairs short-term recall.
    Kozlov MD; Hughes RW; Jones DM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):501-13. PubMed ID: 22150606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.