201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26223353)
1. Computer-aided transrectal ultrasound: does prostate HistoScanning™ improve detection performance of prostate cancer in repeat biopsies?
Hamann MF; Hamann C; Trettel A; Jünemann KP; Naumann CM
BMC Urol; 2015 Jul; 15():76. PubMed ID: 26223353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Value of perineal HistoScanning™ template-guided prostate biopsy].
Hamann MF; Hamann C; Olzem D; Trettel A; Juenemann KP; Naumann CM
Urologe A; 2015 Nov; 54(11):1596, 1598-601. PubMed ID: 25794587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of Prostate HistoScanning as a Method for Targeted Biopsy in Routine Practice.
Glybochko PV; Alyaev YG; Amosov AV; Krupinov GE; Nir D; Winkler M; Ganzha TM
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Mar; 5(2):179-185. PubMed ID: 28753891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Real-time contrast-enhanced transrectal US-guided prostate biopsy: diagnostic accuracy in men with previously negative biopsy results and positive MR imaging findings.
Cornelis F; Rigou G; Le Bras Y; Coutouly X; Hubrecht R; Yacoub M; Pasticier G; Robert G; Grenier N
Radiology; 2013 Oct; 269(1):159-66. PubMed ID: 23657887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Can Power Doppler enhanced transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy improve prostate cancer detection on first and repeat prostate biopsy?
Remzi M; Dobrovits M; Reissigl A; Ravery V; Waldert M; Wiunig C; Fong YK; Djavan B;
Eur Urol; 2004 Oct; 46(4):451-6. PubMed ID: 15363559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of significant prostate cancer detection compared to standard transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schoots IG; Roobol MJ; Nieboer D; Bangma CH; Steyerberg EW; Hunink MG
Eur Urol; 2015 Sep; 68(3):438-50. PubMed ID: 25480312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Does prostate HistoScanning™ play a role in detecting prostate cancer in routine clinical practice? Results from three independent studies.
Javed S; Chadwick E; Edwards AA; Beveridge S; Laing R; Bott S; Eden C; Langley S
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):541-8. PubMed ID: 24224648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Real-time MRI/US fusion-guided biopsy improves detection rates of prostate cancer in pre-biopsied patients].
Maxeiner A; Fischer T; Stephan C; Cash H; Slowinski T; Kilic E; Durmus T
Aktuelle Urol; 2014 May; 45(3):197-203. PubMed ID: 24902069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The combination of targeted and systematic prostate biopsies is the best protocol for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Fourcade A; Payrard C; Tissot V; Perrouin-Verbe MA; Demany N; Serey-Effeil S; Callerot P; Coquet JB; Doucet L; Deruelle C; Joulin V; Nonent M; Fournier G; Valeri A
Scand J Urol; 2018 Jun; 52(3):174-179. PubMed ID: 29463177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer rates in patients with initially negative elastography-targeted biopsy vs. systematic biopsy.
Kratzenberg J; Salomon G; Tennstedt P; Dell'Oglio P; Tilki D; Haferkamp A; Graefen M; Boehm K
World J Urol; 2018 Apr; 36(4):623-628. PubMed ID: 29332260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies.
Pokorny MR; de Rooij M; Duncan E; Schröder FH; Parkinson R; Barentsz JO; Thompson LC
Eur Urol; 2014 Jul; 66(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 24666839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computer-aided (HistoScanning) biopsies versus conventional transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsies: do targeted biopsy schemes improve the cancer detection rate?
Hamann MF; Hamann C; Schenk E; Al-Najar A; Naumann CM; Jünemann KP
Urology; 2013 Feb; 81(2):370-5. PubMed ID: 23374806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Detecting Prostate Cancer.
Brock M; von Bodman C; Palisaar J; Becker W; Martin-Seidel P; Noldus J
Dtsch Arztebl Int; 2015 Sep; 112(37):605-11. PubMed ID: 26396046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Computerized supported transrectal ultrasound (C-TRUS) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer].
Loch T
Urologe A; 2004 Nov; 43(11):1377-84. PubMed ID: 15517143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detection, localisation and characterisation of prostate cancer by prostate HistoScanning(™).
Simmons LA; Autier P; Zát'ura F; Braeckman J; Peltier A; Romic I; Stenzl A; Treurnicht K; Walker T; Nir D; Moore CM; Emberton M
BJU Int; 2012 Jul; 110(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 22093966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Imaging Compared to Transperineal Ultrasound-guided biopsy for significant prostate cancer Risk Evaluation (PICTURE): a prospective cohort validating study assessing Prostate HistoScanning.
Simmons LAM; Kanthabalan A; Arya M; Briggs T; Charman SC; Freeman A; Gelister J; Jameson C; McCartan N; Moore CM; van der Muelen J; Emberton M; Ahmed HU
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2019 May; 22(2):261-267. PubMed ID: 30279583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Targeted Biopsy With Reduced Number of Cores: Optimal Sampling Scheme in Patients Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy.
Shen WW; Cui LG; Ran WQ; Sun Y; Jiang J; Pei XL; Chen W
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 May; 46(5):1197-1207. PubMed ID: 32107089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasonography Fusion Prostate Biopsy Significantly Outperforms Systematic 12-Core Biopsy for Prediction of Total Magnetic Resonance Imaging Tumor Volume in Active Surveillance Patients.
Okoro C; George AK; Siddiqui MM; Rais-Bahrami S; Walton-Diaz A; Shakir NA; Rothwax JT; Raskolnikov D; Stamatakis L; Su D; Turkbey B; Choyke PL; Merino MJ; Parnes HL; Wood BJ; Pinto PA
J Endourol; 2015 Oct; 29(10):1115-21. PubMed ID: 25897467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of TRUS and combined MRI-targeted plus systematic prostate biopsy for the concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology.
Aslan G; Çelik S; Sözen S; Akdoğan B; İzol V; Yücel Bilen C; Sahin B; Türkeri L;
Int J Clin Pract; 2021 Mar; 75(3):e13797. PubMed ID: 33113261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and TRUS-biopsy accuracy in potential candidates for PRIAS active surveillance protocol.
Lacetera V; Galosi AB; Cantoro U; Catanzariti F; Mazzaferro D; Cantoro D; Quaresima L; Conti A; Raquban R; Montironi R; Muzzonigro G
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2012 Dec; 84(4):272-5. PubMed ID: 23427762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
