120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26223588)
1. Secret service.
Nature; 2015 Jul; 523(7562):501-2. PubMed ID: 26223588
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Lab safety. Alarm over biosafety blunders.
Cohen J
Science; 2014 Jul; 345(6194):247-8. PubMed ID: 25035464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Responding to anthrax.
Borg MA; Tieck WC
J Dent Technol; 2001; 18(8):12-4, 28. PubMed ID: 11885187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Bioterrorism today.
Snell N
Biologist (London); 2002 Jun; 49(3):140. PubMed ID: 12097718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Into the zone of the unknown. It's been the blind leading the blind through the maze of anthrax.
Shute N; Spake A
US News World Rep; 2001 Nov; 131(19):40-1, 44-6, 47 passim. PubMed ID: 11710269
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Lessons to be Learned from Recent Biosafety Incidents in the United States.
Weiss S; Yitzhaki S; Shapira SC
Isr Med Assoc J; 2015 May; 17(5):269-73. PubMed ID: 26137650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Anthrax 2001: observations on the medical and public health response.
Gursky E; Inglesby TV; O'Toole T
Biosecur Bioterror; 2003; 1(2):97-110. PubMed ID: 15040187
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Responding to bioterrorism.
Breithaupt H
EMBO Rep; 2001 Dec; 2(12):1053. PubMed ID: 11743010
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. What is the true number of victims of the postal anthrax attack of 2001?
Cymet TC; Kerkvliet GJ
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2004 Nov; 104(11):452. PubMed ID: 15602039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Booming biosafety labs probed.
Wadman M
Nature; 2009 Oct; 461(7264):577. PubMed ID: 19794463
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Anthrax. Profile of a killer.
Lemonick MD
Time; 2001 Nov; 158(22):60-2. PubMed ID: 11817276
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Heightened security after flu scare sparks biosafety debate.
Check E
Nature; 2005 Apr; 434(7036):943. PubMed ID: 15846307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Anthrax bioterrorism: lessons learned and future directions.
Hughes JM; Gerberding JL
Emerg Infect Dis; 2002 Oct; 8(10):1013-4. PubMed ID: 12396907
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Boston locals fight government scheme for bioterror defence lab.
Dalton R
Nature; 2004 Apr; 428(6985):785. PubMed ID: 15103335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Blinded by bioterrorism: public health and liberty in the 21st century.
Annas GJ
Health Matrix Clevel; 2003; 13(1):33-70. PubMed ID: 14569657
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The hunt for the anthrax killers.
Ripley A
Time; 2001 Nov; 158(20):34-40, 43. PubMed ID: 11710155
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Universities address mail security as anthrax fears rise.
Knight J
Nature; 2001 Nov; 414(6860):136. PubMed ID: 11700511
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Validating the performance of biological detection equipment: the role of the federal government.
Emanuel PA; Chue C; Kerr L; Cullin D
Biosecur Bioterror; 2003; 1(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 15040191
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. 'I need scientists!'.
Fineman H
Newsweek; 2001 Nov; 139(19):42-4. PubMed ID: 11710160
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A dose of reality for the health watchdogs.
Kluger J
Time; 2001 Oct; 158(19):65-6. PubMed ID: 11699134
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
