These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

351 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26223739)

  • 1. Quality assurance in radiology: peer review and peer feedback.
    Strickland NH
    Clin Radiol; 2015 Nov; 70(11):1158-64. PubMed ID: 26223739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance results for a workstation-integrated radiology peer review quality assurance program.
    O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2016 Jun; 28(3):294-8. PubMed ID: 26892609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Peer review in cardiothoracic radiology.
    Kanne JP
    J Thorac Imaging; 2014 Sep; 29(5):270-6; quiz 277-8. PubMed ID: 25160595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A workstation-integrated peer review quality assurance program: pilot study.
    O'Keeffe MM; Davis TM; Siminoski K
    BMC Med Imaging; 2013 Jul; 13():19. PubMed ID: 23822583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiology peer-review feedback scorecards: optimizing transparency, accessibility, and education in a children׳s hospital.
    Iyer RS; Munsell A; Weinberger E
    Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2014; 43(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 24948210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consensus-oriented group peer review: a new process to review radiologist work output.
    Alkasab TK; Harvey HB; Gowda V; Thrall JH; Rosenthal DI; Gazelle GS
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Feb; 11(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 24139321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Survey of peer review programs among pediatric radiologists: report from the SPR Quality and Safety Committee.
    Iyer RS; Swenson DW; Anand N; Blumfield E; Chandra T; Chavhan GB; Goodman TR; Khan N; Moore MM; Ngo TD; Sammet CL; Sze RW; Vera CD; Stanescu AL
    Pediatr Radiol; 2019 Apr; 49(4):517-525. PubMed ID: 30923884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Value-Based Assessment of Radiology Reporting Using Radiologist-Referring Physician Two-Way Feedback System-a Design Thinking-Based Approach.
    Shaikh F; Hendrata K; Kolowitz B; Awan O; Shrestha R; Deible C
    J Digit Imaging; 2017 Jun; 30(3):267-274. PubMed ID: 28070707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Meaningful Peer Review in Radiology: A Review of Current Practices and Potential Future Directions.
    Moriarity AK; Hawkins CM; Geis JR; Dreyer KJ; Kamer AP; Khandheria P; Morey J; Whitfill J; Wiggins RH; Itri JN
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Dec; 13(12 Pt A):1519-1524. PubMed ID: 28233533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Optimizing peer review: A year of experience after instituting a real-time comment-enhanced program at a children's hospital.
    Swanson JO; Thapa MM; Iyer RS; Otto RK; Weinberger E
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 May; 198(5):1121-5. PubMed ID: 22528902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Current Status and Future Wish List of Peer Review: A National Questionnaire of U.S. Radiologists.
    Lee CS; Neumann C; Jha P; Baumgarten DA; Chu L; Surovitsky M; Kadom N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):493-497. PubMed ID: 31939700
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Implementation and Validation of PACS Integrated Peer Review for Discrepancy Recording of Radiology Reporting.
    Olthof AW; van Ooijen PM
    J Med Syst; 2016 Sep; 40(9):193. PubMed ID: 27443339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. RADPEER quality assurance program: a multifacility study of interpretive disagreement rates.
    Borgstede JP; Lewis RS; Bhargavan M; Sunshine JH
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Jan; 1(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 17411521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Trainee report dashboard: tool for enhancing feedback to radiology trainees about their reports.
    Gorniak RJ; Flanders AE; Sharpe RE
    Radiographics; 2013; 33(7):2105-13. PubMed ID: 23988632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Quality initiatives: measuring and managing the procedural competency of radiologists.
    Mendiratta-Lala M; Eisenberg RL; Steele JR; Boiselle PM; Kruskal JB
    Radiographics; 2011; 31(5):1477-88. PubMed ID: 21719719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peer review in diagnostic radiology: current state and a vision for the future.
    Mahgerefteh S; Kruskal JB; Yam CS; Blachar A; Sosna J
    Radiographics; 2009; 29(5):1221-31. PubMed ID: 19564252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Integration of radiologist peer review into clinical review workstation.
    McEnery KW; Suitor CT; Hildebrand S; Downs RL
    J Digit Imaging; 2000 May; 13(2 Suppl 1):101-4. PubMed ID: 10847374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An introduction to basic quality metrics for practicing radiologists.
    Kruskal JB; Sarwar A
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Apr; 12(4):330-2. PubMed ID: 25745829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improving Radiology Peer Learning: Comparing a Novel Electronic Peer Learning Tool and a Traditional Score-Based Peer Review System.
    Trinh TW; Boland GW; Khorasani R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Jan; 212(1):135-141. PubMed ID: 30403533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Structured feedback from referring physicians: a novel approach to quality improvement in radiology reporting.
    Gunn AJ; Alabre CI; Bennett SE; Kautzky M; Krakower T; Palamara K; Choy G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2013 Oct; 201(4):853-7. PubMed ID: 24059375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.