399 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26223774)
1. Caesarean section at full cervical dilatation.
Davis G; Fleming T; Ford K; Mouawad MR; Ludlow J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Dec; 55(6):565-71. PubMed ID: 26223774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Rising rates of caesarean deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a concerning trend.
Unterscheider J; McMenamin M; Cullinane F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2011 Aug; 157(2):141-4. PubMed ID: 21470764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Risk of preterm birth in the subsequent pregnancy following caesarean section at full cervical dilatation compared with mid-cavity instrumental delivery.
Wang M; Kirby A; Gibbs E; Gidaszewski B; Khajehei M; Chua SC
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2020 Jun; 60(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 31514230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Exploring full cervical dilatation caesarean sections-A retrospective cohort study.
Corry EMA; Ramphul M; Rowan AM; Segurado R; Mahony RM; Keane DP
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 May; 224():188-191. PubMed ID: 29614445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Does previous caesarean section at full dilatation increase the likelihood of subsequent spontaneous preterm birth?
Cong A; de Vries B; Ludlow J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2018 Jun; 58(3):267-273. PubMed ID: 28960252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Caesarean sections and instrumental deliveries at full cervical dilatation: a retrospective review.
Tan PS; Tan JKH; Tan EL; Tan LK
Singapore Med J; 2019 Feb; 60(2):75-79. PubMed ID: 29670996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Caesarean Section During Second Stage of Labor in a Tertiary Centre.
Gurung P; Malla S; Lama S; Malla A; Singh A
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2017 Sep; 15(2):178-181. PubMed ID: 29016591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between cervical dilatation at initial presentation in labour and subsequent intervention.
Holmes P; Oppenheimer LW; Wen SW
BJOG; 2001 Nov; 108(11):1120-4. PubMed ID: 11762649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [How long can we wait at full dilatation. A study of maternal and neonatal morbidity related to the duration of the second stage of labour in nulliparous women].
Naime-Alix AF; Fourquet F; Sigue D; Potin J; Descriaud C; Perrotin F
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2008 May; 37(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 18325688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Determinants and Outcomes of Emergency Caesarean Section following Failed Instrumental Delivery: 5-Year Observational Review at a Tertiary Referral Centre in London.
McDonnell S; Chandraharan E
J Pregnancy; 2015; 2015():627810. PubMed ID: 26078882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity.
Selo-Ojeme D; Sathiyathasan S; Fayyaz M
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Sep; 278(3):245-9. PubMed ID: 18189142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Fear of failure: are we doing too many trials of instrumental delivery in theatre?
Ebulue V; Vadalkar J; Cely S; Dopwell F; Yoong W
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2008; 87(11):1234-8. PubMed ID: 19016358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study.
Murphy DJ; Liebling RE; Verity L; Swingler R; Patel R
Lancet; 2001 Oct; 358(9289):1203-7. PubMed ID: 11675055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.
Murphy DJ; Liebling RE; Patel R; Verity L; Swingler R
BJOG; 2003 Jun; 110(6):610-5. PubMed ID: 12798481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Gentle obstetrical management for very early preterm deliveries].
Schneider H
Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2004 Jan; 44(1):10-18. PubMed ID: 14673223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A re-evaluation of the role of rotational forceps: retrospective comparison of maternal and perinatal outcomes following different methods of birth for malposition in the second stage of labour.
Tempest N; Hart A; Walkinshaw S; Hapangama DK
BJOG; 2013 Sep; 120(10):1277-84. PubMed ID: 23906197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mode of delivery following successful external cephalic version: comparison with spontaneous cephalic presentations at delivery.
Kuppens SM; Hutton EK; Hasaart TH; Aichi N; Wijnen HA; Pop VJ
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2013 Oct; 35(10):883-888. PubMed ID: 24165055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of maternal and neonatal outcomes following caesarean section in second versus first stage of labour in a Tertiary Hospital in Nigeria.
Rabiu KA; Adewunmi AA; Akinola OI; Eti AE; Tayo AO
Niger Postgrad Med J; 2011 Sep; 18(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 21909144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Labour dystocia--risk of recurrence and instrumental delivery in following labour--a population-based cohort study.
Sandström A; Cnattingius S; Wikström AK; Stephansson O
BJOG; 2012 Dec; 119(13):1648-56. PubMed ID: 23078516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal blood sampling in early labour: is there an increased risk of operative delivery and fetal morbidity?
Heazell AE; Riches J; Hopkins L; Myers JE
BJOG; 2011 Jun; 118(7):849-55. PubMed ID: 21401852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
