These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26223966)

  • 1. Bubble sorting in pinched microchannels for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
    Kok MP; Segers T; Versluis M
    Lab Chip; 2015; 15(18):3716-22. PubMed ID: 26223966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic bubble sorting for ultrasound contrast agent enrichment.
    Segers T; Versluis M
    Lab Chip; 2014 May; 14(10):1705-14. PubMed ID: 24651248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microbubble characterization through acoustically induced deflation.
    Guidi F; Vos HJ; Mori R; de Jong N; Tortoli P
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010 Jan; 57(1):193-202. PubMed ID: 20040446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Combining Ultrasound and Capillary-Embedded T-Junction Microfluidic Devices to Scale Up the Production of Narrow-Sized Microbubbles through Acoustic Fragmentation.
    Khan AH; Jiang X; Kaushik A; Nair HS; Edirisinghe M; Mercado-Shekhar KP; Shekhar H; Dalvi SV
    Langmuir; 2022 Aug; 38(33):10288-10304. PubMed ID: 35943351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel technology: microfluidic devices for microbubble ultrasound contrast agent generation.
    Lin H; Chen J; Chen C
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2016 Sep; 54(9):1317-30. PubMed ID: 27016369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic characterization of monodisperse lipid-coated microbubbles: relationship between size and shell viscoelastic properties.
    Parrales MA; Fernandez JM; Perez-Saborid M; Kopechek JA; Porter TM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Sep; 136(3):1077. PubMed ID: 25190383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. On-chip preparation of nanoscale contrast agents towards high-resolution ultrasound imaging.
    Peyman SA; McLaughlan JR; Abou-Saleh RH; Marston G; Johnson BR; Freear S; Coletta PL; Markham AF; Evans SD
    Lab Chip; 2016 Feb; 16(4):679-87. PubMed ID: 26689151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Simulation of noninvasive blood pressure estimation using ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Li F; Wang L; Fan Y; Li D
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Apr; 59(4):715-26. PubMed ID: 22547282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Controlling the size distribution of lipid-coated bubbles via fluidity regulation.
    Wang CH; Yeh CK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 May; 39(5):882-92. PubMed ID: 23453628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of vaporized submicron perfluorocarbon droplets as an ultrasound contrast agent.
    Reznik N; Williams R; Burns PN
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1271-9. PubMed ID: 21723449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Acoustic characterization of single ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Sijl J; Gaud E; Frinking PJ; Arditi M; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):4091-7. PubMed ID: 19206831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Microbubble size isolation by differential centrifugation.
    Feshitan JA; Chen CC; Kwan JJ; Borden MA
    J Colloid Interface Sci; 2009 Jan; 329(2):316-24. PubMed ID: 18950786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dynamics of coated microbubbles adherent to a wall.
    Overvelde M; Garbin V; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1500-8. PubMed ID: 21816289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Monodisperse versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: In Vivo Sensitivity and safety in Rat and Pig.
    Helbert A; Gaud E; Segers T; Botteron C; Frinking P; Jeannot V
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 46(12):3339-3352. PubMed ID: 33008649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Subharmonic behavior of phospholipid-coated ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles.
    Sijl J; Dollet B; Overvelde M; Garbin V; Rozendal T; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Nov; 128(5):3239-52. PubMed ID: 21110619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical modeling of microbubble backscatter to optimize ultrasound particle image velocimetry imaging: initial studies.
    Mukdadi OM; Kim HB; Hertzberg J; Shandas R
    Ultrasonics; 2004 Aug; 42(10):1111-21. PubMed ID: 15234173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Microbubbles loaded with nanoparticles: a route to multiple imaging modalities.
    Park JI; Jagadeesan D; Williams R; Oakden W; Chung S; Stanisz GJ; Kumacheva E
    ACS Nano; 2010 Nov; 4(11):6579-86. PubMed ID: 20968309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unbinding of targeted ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by secondary acoustic forces.
    Garbin V; Overvelde M; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6161-77. PubMed ID: 21878709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Scaleable production of microbubbles using an ultrasound-modulated microfluidic device.
    Carugo D; Browning RJ; Iranmanesh I; Messaoudi W; Rademeyer P; Stride E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2021 Aug; 150(2):1577. PubMed ID: 34470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Narrow size distribution of microbubbles for enhancement of harmonic imaging.
    Moon H; Yu J; Park S; Chang JH; Song TK; Kim H
    J Biomed Nanotechnol; 2013 May; 9(5):845-8. PubMed ID: 23802414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.