These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26223966)
21. Ultrasound attenuation in encapsulated microbubble suspensions: The multiple scattering effects. Chen J; Zhu Z Ultrasound Med Biol; 2006 Jun; 32(6):961-9. PubMed ID: 16785017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Microbubble embedded with upconversion nanoparticles as a bimodal contrast agent for fluorescence and ultrasound imaging. Jin B; Lin M; Zong Y; Wan M; Xu F; Duan Z; Lu T Nanotechnology; 2015 Aug; 26(34):345601. PubMed ID: 26243035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Bubble size distribution in acoustic droplet vaporization via dissolution using an ultrasound wide-beam method. Xu S; Zong Y; Li W; Zhang S; Wan M Ultrason Sonochem; 2014 May; 21(3):975-83. PubMed ID: 24360840 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. 20 years of ultrasound contrast agent modeling. Faez T; Emmer M; Kooiman K; Versluis M; van der Steen A; de Jong N IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2013 Jan; 60(1):7-20. PubMed ID: 23287909 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies. Streeter JE; Gessner R; Miles I; Dayton PA Mol Imaging; 2010 Apr; 9(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 20236606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Tailoring the size distribution of ultrasound contrast agents: possible method for improving sensitivity in molecular imaging. Talu E; Hettiarachchi K; Zhao S; Powell RL; Lee AP; Longo ML; Dayton PA Mol Imaging; 2007; 6(6):384-92. PubMed ID: 18053409 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monodisperse Versus Polydisperse Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Non-Linear Response, Sensitivity, and Deep Tissue Imaging Potential. Segers T; Kruizinga P; Kok MP; Lajoinie G; de Jong N; Versluis M Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1482-1492. PubMed ID: 29705522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Correspondence - Nonlinear oscillations of deflating bubbles. Viti J; Mori R; Guidi F; Versluis M; Jong ND; Tortoli P IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Dec; 59(12):2818-24. PubMed ID: 23221232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Review of shell models for contrast agent microbubbles. Doinikov AA; Bouakaz A IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2011 May; 58(5):981-93. PubMed ID: 21622054 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. High-speed optical observations of contrast agent destruction. Bouakaz A; Versluis M; de Jong N Ultrasound Med Biol; 2005 Mar; 31(3):391-9. PubMed ID: 15749563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Resonance frequency of microbubbles in small blood vessels: a numerical study. Sassaroli E; Hynynen K Phys Med Biol; 2005 Nov; 50(22):5293-305. PubMed ID: 16264254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Continuous and size-dependent sorting of emulsion droplets using hydrodynamics in pinched microchannels. Maenaka H; Yamada M; Yasuda M; Seki M Langmuir; 2008 Apr; 24(8):4405-10. PubMed ID: 18327961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Enhancement by optical force of separation in pinched flow fractionation. Lee KH; Kim SB; Lee KS; Sung HJ Lab Chip; 2011 Jan; 11(2):354-7. PubMed ID: 20957274 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. On-chip generation of microbubbles as a practical technology for manufacturing contrast agents for ultrasonic imaging. Hettiarachchi K; Talu E; Longo ML; Dayton PA; Lee AP Lab Chip; 2007 Apr; 7(4):463-8. PubMed ID: 17389962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Ultrasonic characterization of ultrasound contrast agents. de Jong N; Emmer M; van Wamel A; Versluis M Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):861-73. PubMed ID: 19468770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Influence of nesting shell size on brightness longevity and resistance to ultrasound-induced dissolution during enhanced B-mode contrast imaging. Wallace N; Dicker S; Lewin P; Wrenn SP Ultrasonics; 2014 Dec; 54(8):2099-108. PubMed ID: 25041980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study on the multiple scattering effects of ultrasound contrast agents. Chen J; Zhu Z Ultrasonics; 2006 Dec; 44 Suppl 1():e115-8. PubMed ID: 16854444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Sheathless and high throughput sorting of paramagnetic microparticles in a magneto-hydrodynamic microfluidic device. Kumar V; Rezai P Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2016 Aug; 2016():473-476. PubMed ID: 28268374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Magneto-Hydrodynamic Fractionation (MHF) for continuous and sheathless sorting of high-concentration paramagnetic microparticles. Kumar V; Rezai P Biomed Microdevices; 2017 Jun; 19(2):39. PubMed ID: 28466285 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The effect of binding on the subharmonic emissions from individual lipid-encapsulated microbubbles at transmit frequencies of 11 and 25 MHz. Helfield BL; Cherin E; Foster FS; Goertz DE Ultrasound Med Biol; 2013 Feb; 39(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 23219039 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]