222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26224610)
1. The influence of stem offset and neck shaft angles on the range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
Shoji T; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Hachisuka S; Ochi M
Int Orthop; 2016 Feb; 40(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26224610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Do post-operative changes of neck-shaft angle and femoral component anteversion have an effect on clinical outcome following uncemented total hip arthroplasty?
Müller M; Abdel MP; Wassilew GI; Duda G; Perka C
Bone Joint J; 2015 Dec; 97-B(12):1615-22. PubMed ID: 26637674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Excessive femoral offset does not affect the range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.
Hayashi S; Nishiyama T; Fujishiro T; Hashimoto S; Kanzaki N; Nishida K; Kuroda R; Kurosaka M
Int Orthop; 2013 Jul; 37(7):1233-7. PubMed ID: 23553118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Factors affecting bony impingement in hip arthroplasty.
Kurtz WB; Ecker TM; Reichmann WM; Murphy SB
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Jun; 25(4):624-34.e1-2. PubMed ID: 19559561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine Bone Morphology in Hip Dysplasia and Its Effect on Hip Range of Motion in Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Shoji T; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Adachi N; Ochi M
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2058-63. PubMed ID: 27012430
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Low femoral antetorsion as a risk factor for bony impingement after bipolar hemiarthroplasty.
Shoji T; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Hachisuka S; Ochi M
J Orthop Surg Res; 2015 Jul; 10():105. PubMed ID: 26149008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low femoral antetorsion and total hip arthroplasty: a risk factor.
Shoji T; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Hachisuka S; Ochi M
Int Orthop; 2015 Jan; 39(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 25086820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Bony impingement depends on the bone morphology of the hip after total hip arthroplasty.
Shoji T; Yasunaga Y; Yamasaki T; Mori R; Hamanishi M; Ochi M
Int Orthop; 2013 Oct; 37(10):1897-903. PubMed ID: 23860789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in range of motion with the same combined anteversion after total hip arthroplasty.
Ohmori T; Kabata T; Kajino Y; Taga T; Hasegawa K; Inoue D; Yamamoto T; Takagi T; Yoshitani J; Ueno T; Tsuchiya H
Int Orthop; 2018 May; 42(5):1021-1028. PubMed ID: 28990125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of hip center position, anterior inferior iliac spine morphology, and ball head diameter on range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
Tabata T; Kaku N; Tagomori H; Tsumura H
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Feb; 105(1):23-28. PubMed ID: 30509621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of femoral bowing on range of motion after total hip arthroplasty.
Akiyama K; Shibuya T
Int Orthop; 2018 Aug; 42(8):1795-1802. PubMed ID: 29275431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Factors affecting the potential for posterior bony impingement after total hip arthroplasty.
Shoji T; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Murakami H; Mifuji K; Sawa M; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N; Ochi M
Bone Joint J; 2017 Sep; 99-B(9):1140-1146. PubMed ID: 28860392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Some Offset Restoration Options Can Paradoxically Lead to Decreased Range of Motion in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A 3-Dimensional Computer Simulation Study.
Pour AE; Donnelley CA; Tung WS; Tommasini SM; Wiznia D
J Arthroplasty; 2024 Feb; 39(2):514-519.e3. PubMed ID: 37625464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Impingement-free, Prosthesis-specific, and Anatomy-adjusted Combined Target Zone for Component Positioning in THA Depends on Design and Implantation Parameters of both Components.
Widmer KH
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2020 Aug; 478(8):1904-1918. PubMed ID: 32732575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-Dimensional Functional Impingement in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Biomechanical Analysis.
Debbi EM; Quevedo González FJ; Jerabek SA; Wright TM; Vigdorchik JM
J Arthroplasty; 2022 Jul; 37(7S):S678-S684. PubMed ID: 35271980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Soft tissue restricts impingement-free mobility in total hip arthroplasty.
Woerner M; Weber M; Sendtner E; Springorum R; Worlicek M; Craiovan B; Grifka J; Renkawitz T
Int Orthop; 2017 Feb; 41(2):277-282. PubMed ID: 27150487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A biomechanical comparison of the thrust plate prosthesis and a stemmed prosthesis.
Karatosun V; Unver B; Gultekin A; Gunal I
Hip Int; 2011; 21(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 21960448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Femoral Morphology in the Dysplastic Hip: Three-dimensional Characterizations With CT.
Wells J; Nepple JJ; Crook K; Ross JR; Bedi A; Schoenecker P; Clohisy JC
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Apr; 475(4):1045-1054. PubMed ID: 27752989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of cup medialization and lateralization on hip range of motion in total hip arthroplasty.
Shoji T; Yamasaki T; Izumi S; Kenji M; Sawa M; Yasunaga Y; Adachi N
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2018 Aug; 57():121-128. PubMed ID: 29986274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Increased range of motion to impingement with large head total hip arthroplasty: point of diminishing returns.
Klingenstein GG; Yeager AM; Lipman JD; Westrich GH
Hip Int; 2012; 22(3):261-5. PubMed ID: 22773504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
