These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

327 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26224644)

  • 1. Fifteen years of genomewide scans for selection: trends, lessons and unaddressed genetic sources of complication.
    Haasl RJ; Payseur BA
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):5-23. PubMed ID: 26224644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Genomic resources and their influence on the detection of the signal of positive selection in genome scans.
    Manel S; Perrier C; Pratlong M; Abi-Rached L; Paganini J; Pontarotti P; Aurelle D
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):170-84. PubMed ID: 26562485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genetic architecture and balancing selection: the life and death of differentiated variants.
    Llaurens V; Whibley A; Joron M
    Mol Ecol; 2017 May; 26(9):2430-2448. PubMed ID: 28173627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Revealing the selection history of adaptive loci using genome-wide scans for selection: an example from domestic sheep.
    Rochus CM; Tortereau F; Plisson-Petit F; Restoux G; Moreno-Romieux C; Tosser-Klopp G; Servin B
    BMC Genomics; 2018 Jan; 19(1):71. PubMed ID: 29357834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genetic analysis of differentiation among breeding ponds reveals a candidate gene for local adaptation in Rana arvalis.
    Richter-Boix A; Quintela M; Segelbacher G; Laurila A
    Mol Ecol; 2011 Apr; 20(8):1582-600. PubMed ID: 21332585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Q(ST)-F(ST) comparisons: evolutionary and ecological insights from genomic heterogeneity.
    Leinonen T; McCairns RJ; O'Hara RB; Merilä J
    Nat Rev Genet; 2013 Mar; 14(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 23381120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Controlling false discoveries in genome scans for selection.
    François O; Martins H; Caye K; Schoville SD
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(2):454-69. PubMed ID: 26671840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Molecular population genetics and the search for adaptive evolution in plants.
    Wright SI; Gaut BS
    Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Mar; 22(3):506-19. PubMed ID: 15525701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative genomics and the study of evolution by natural selection.
    Ellegren H
    Mol Ecol; 2008 Nov; 17(21):4586-96. PubMed ID: 19140982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. How natural selection shapes genetic differentiation in the MHC region: A case study with Native Americans.
    Nunes K; Maia MHT; Dos Santos EJM; Dos Santos SEB; Guerreiro JF; Petzl-Erler ML; Bedoya G; Gallo C; Poletti G; Llop E; Tsuneto L; Bortolini MC; Rothhammer F; Single R; Ruiz-Linares A; Rocha J; Meyer D
    Hum Immunol; 2021 Jul; 82(7):523-531. PubMed ID: 33812704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Targeted capture and resequencing of 1040 genes reveal environmentally driven functional variation in grey wolves.
    Schweizer RM; Robinson J; Harrigan R; Silva P; Galverni M; Musiani M; Green RE; Novembre J; Wayne RK
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):357-79. PubMed ID: 26562361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of parasite-driven selection in shaping landscape genomic structure in red grouse (Lagopus lagopus scotica).
    Wenzel MA; Douglas A; James MC; Redpath SM; Piertney SB
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Jan; 25(1):324-41. PubMed ID: 26578090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The molecular signature of selection underlying human adaptations.
    Harris EE; Meyer D
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2006; Suppl 43():89-130. PubMed ID: 17103426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Natural selection in gene-dense regions shapes the genomic pattern of polymorphism in wild and domesticated rice.
    Flowers JM; Molina J; Rubinstein S; Huang P; Schaal BA; Purugganan MD
    Mol Biol Evol; 2012 Feb; 29(2):675-87. PubMed ID: 21917724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finding needles in a genomic haystack: targeted capture identifies clear signatures of selection in a nonmodel plant species.
    Christmas MJ; Biffin E; Breed MF; Lowe AJ
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Sep; 25(17):4216-33. PubMed ID: 27396238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Whole-genome resequencing uncovers molecular signatures of natural and sexual selection in wild bighorn sheep.
    Kardos M; Luikart G; Bunch R; Dewey S; Edwards W; McWilliam S; Stephenson J; Allendorf FW; Hogg JT; Kijas J
    Mol Ecol; 2015 Nov; 24(22):5616-32. PubMed ID: 26454263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A new approach for using genome scans to detect recent positive selection in the human genome.
    Tang K; Thornton KR; Stoneking M
    PLoS Biol; 2007 Jul; 5(7):e171. PubMed ID: 17579516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomewide identification of genes under directional selection: gene transcription Q(ST) scan in diverging Atlantic salmon subpopulations.
    Roberge C; Guderley H; Bernatchez L
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):1011-22. PubMed ID: 17720934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The role of selection in driving landscape genomic structure of the waterflea Daphnia magna.
    Orsini L; Mergeay J; Vanoverbeke J; De Meester L
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(3):583-601. PubMed ID: 23174029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. High degree of genetic differentiation in marine three-spined sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus).
    Defaveri J; Shikano T; Shimada Y; Merilä J
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Sep; 22(18):4811-28. PubMed ID: 23947683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.