These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

452 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26225536)

  • 41. Comprehensive evaluation of ten docking programs on a diverse set of protein-ligand complexes: the prediction accuracy of sampling power and scoring power.
    Wang Z; Sun H; Yao X; Li D; Xu L; Li Y; Tian S; Hou T
    Phys Chem Chem Phys; 2016 May; 18(18):12964-75. PubMed ID: 27108770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. FWAVina: A novel optimization algorithm for protein-ligand docking based on the fireworks algorithm.
    Li J; Song Y; Li F; Zhang H; Liu W
    Comput Biol Chem; 2020 Oct; 88():107363. PubMed ID: 32861160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ligand- and receptor-based docking with LiBELa.
    dos Santos Muniz H; Nascimento AS
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Aug; 29(8):713-23. PubMed ID: 26141308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Novel inhibitor discovery through virtual screening against multiple protein conformations generated via ligand-directed modeling: a maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase example.
    Mahasenan KV; Li C
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 May; 52(5):1345-55. PubMed ID: 22540736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Protein-Ligand Blind Docking Using QuickVina-W With Inter-Process Spatio-Temporal Integration.
    Hassan NM; Alhossary AA; Mu Y; Kwoh CK
    Sci Rep; 2017 Nov; 7(1):15451. PubMed ID: 29133831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Experimental validation of FINDSITE(comb) virtual ligand screening results for eight proteins yields novel nanomolar and micromolar binders.
    Srinivasan B; Zhou H; Kubanek J; Skolnick J
    J Cheminform; 2014; 6():16. PubMed ID: 24936211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. SPOT-ligand 2: improving structure-based virtual screening by binding-homology search on an expanded structural template library.
    Litfin T; Zhou Y; Yang Y
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Apr; 33(8):1238-1240. PubMed ID: 28057679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Cheminformatics meets molecular mechanics: a combined application of knowledge-based pose scoring and physical force field-based hit scoring functions improves the accuracy of structure-based virtual screening.
    Hsieh JH; Yin S; Wang XS; Liu S; Dokholyan NV; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Jan; 52(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 22017385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Docking and Virtual Screening in Drug Discovery.
    Kontoyianni M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1647():255-266. PubMed ID: 28809009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Docking of small molecules to farnesoid X receptors using AutoDock Vina with the Convex-PL potential: lessons learned from D3R Grand Challenge 2.
    Kadukova M; Grudinin S
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2018 Jan; 32(1):151-162. PubMed ID: 28913782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A Novel Scoring Based Distributed Protein Docking Application to Improve Enrichment.
    Pradeep P; Struble C; Neumann T; Sem DS; Merrill SJ
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2015; 12(6):1464-9. PubMed ID: 26671816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Addressing recent docking challenges: A hybrid strategy to integrate template-based and free protein-protein docking.
    Yan Y; Wen Z; Wang X; Huang SY
    Proteins; 2017 Mar; 85(3):497-512. PubMed ID: 28026062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Comprehensive comparison of ligand-based virtual screening tools against the DUD data set reveals limitations of current 3D methods.
    Venkatraman V; Pérez-Nueno VI; Mavridis L; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Dec; 50(12):2079-93. PubMed ID: 21090728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Information decay in molecular docking screens against holo, apo, and modeled conformations of enzymes.
    McGovern SL; Shoichet BK
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jul; 46(14):2895-907. PubMed ID: 12825931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Using consensus-shape clustering to identify promiscuous ligands and protein targets and to choose the right query for shape-based virtual screening.
    Pérez-Nueno VI; Ritchie DW
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Jun; 51(6):1233-48. PubMed ID: 21604699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. HybridDock: A Hybrid Protein-Ligand Docking Protocol Integrating Protein- and Ligand-Based Approaches.
    Huang SY; Li M; Wang J; Pan Y
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Jun; 56(6):1078-87. PubMed ID: 26317502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Knowledge-guided docking: accurate prospective prediction of bound configurations of novel ligands using Surflex-Dock.
    Cleves AE; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2015 Jun; 29(6):485-509. PubMed ID: 25940276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Surflex-Dock: Docking benchmarks and real-world application.
    Spitzer R; Jain AN
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):687-99. PubMed ID: 22569590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Holo Protein Conformation Generation from Apo Structures by Ligand Binding Site Refinement.
    Zhang J; Li H; Zhao X; Wu Q; Huang SY
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Nov; 62(22):5806-5820. PubMed ID: 36342197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Docking and scoring with ICM: the benchmarking results and strategies for improvement.
    Neves MA; Totrov M; Abagyan R
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):675-86. PubMed ID: 22569591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.