177 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26225564)
1. Systematic Reviewers in Clinical Neurology Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries.
Sinnett PM; Carr B; Cook G; Mucklerath H; Varney L; Weiher M; Yerokhin V; Vassar M
PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0134596. PubMed ID: 26225564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic Reviews Published in Emergency Medicine Journals Do Not Routinely Search Clinical Trials Registries: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.
Keil LG; Platts-Mills TF; Jones CW
Ann Emerg Med; 2015 Oct; 66(4):424-427.e2. PubMed ID: 25447560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Clinical trial registry use in anaesthesiology systematic reviews: A cross-sectional study of systematic reviews published in anaesthesiology journals and the Cochrane Library.
Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Sims MT; Vassar M
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2017 Dec; 34(12):797-807. PubMed ID: 28731924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Utilization of Clinical Trials Registries in Obstetrics and Gynecology Systematic Reviews.
Bibens ME; Chong AB; Vassar M
Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Feb; 127(2):248-53. PubMed ID: 26942350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical trials registries are underused in the pregnancy and childbirth literature: a systematic review of the top 20 journals.
Yerokhin VV; Carr BK; Sneed G; Vassar M
BMC Res Notes; 2016 Oct; 9(1):475. PubMed ID: 27769265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Trial Registry Use in Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Gray HM; Simpson A; Bowers A; Johnson AL; Vassar M
J Surg Res; 2020 Mar; 247():323-331. PubMed ID: 31708197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of searching clinical trial registries in systematic reviews of pharmaceutical treatments: methodological systematic review and reanalysis of meta-analyses.
Baudard M; Yavchitz A; Ravaud P; Perrodeau E; Boutron I
BMJ; 2017 Feb; 356():j448. PubMed ID: 28213479
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Clinical Trial Registry Use in Orthopaedic Surgery Systematic Reviews.
Reddy AK; Anderson JM; Gray HM; Fishbeck K; Vassar M
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2021 May; 103(10):e41. PubMed ID: 33983151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical trials registries are under-utilized in the conduct of systematic reviews: a cross-sectional analysis.
Jones CW; Keil LG; Weaver MA; Platts-Mills TF
Syst Rev; 2014 Oct; 3():126. PubMed ID: 25348628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Infrequent use of clinical trials registries in published systematic reviews in urology.
Aro T; Koo K; Matlaga BR
World J Urol; 2020 May; 38(5):1335-1340. PubMed ID: 31444605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effect of reporting bias on meta-analyses of drug trials: reanalysis of meta-analyses.
Hart B; Lundh A; Bero L
BMJ; 2012 Jan; 344():d7202. PubMed ID: 22214754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Database selection in systematic reviews: an insight through clinical neurology.
Vassar M; Yerokhin V; Sinnett PM; Weiher M; Muckelrath H; Carr B; Varney L; Cook G
Health Info Libr J; 2017 Jun; 34(2):156-164. PubMed ID: 28383159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Trial Registry Searches in Plastic Surgery Systematic Reviews: A Meta-epidemiological Study.
Hughes GK; Garrett EP; Staggs JD; Reddy AK; Wiebe JE; Vassar M
J Surg Res; 2023 Aug; 288():21-27. PubMed ID: 36948029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical trial registry searches are under-utilized in systematic reviews from critical care journals: A bibliometric analysis.
Greiner B; Corcoran A; Wheeler D
J Crit Care; 2021 Jun; 63():175-178. PubMed ID: 33012585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of inclusion of industry trial results registries as an information source for systematic reviews.
Potthast R; Vervölgyi V; McGauran N; Kerekes MF; Wieseler B; Kaiser T
PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e92067. PubMed ID: 24743113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Search for unpublished data by systematic reviewers: an audit.
Ziai H; Zhang R; Chan AW; Persaud N
BMJ Open; 2017 Oct; 7(10):e017737. PubMed ID: 28988181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Extent of non-publication in cohorts of studies approved by research ethics committees or included in trial registries.
Schmucker C; Schell LK; Portalupi S; Oeller P; Cabrera L; Bassler D; Schwarzer G; Scherer RW; Antes G; von Elm E; Meerpohl JJ;
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e114023. PubMed ID: 25536072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Gaps exist in the current guidance on the use of randomized controlled trial study protocols in systematic reviews.
Boden C; Bidonde J; Busch A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 May; 85():59-69. PubMed ID: 28455185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Errors in the conduct of systematic reviews of pharmacological interventions for irritable bowel syndrome.
Ford AC; Guyatt GH; Talley NJ; Moayyedi P
Am J Gastroenterol; 2010 Feb; 105(2):280-8. PubMed ID: 19920807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Value and usability of unpublished data sources for systematic reviews and network meta-analyses.
Halfpenny NJ; Quigley JM; Thompson JC; Scott DA
Evid Based Med; 2016 Dec; 21(6):208-213. PubMed ID: 27686328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
