243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26225933)
1. The effect of minimum impact education on visitor spatial behavior in parks and protected areas: An experimental investigation using GPS-based tracking.
Kidd AM; Monz C; D'Antonio A; Manning RE; Reigner N; Goonan KA; Jacobi C
J Environ Manage; 2015 Oct; 162():53-62. PubMed ID: 26225933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of visitor use levels on visitor spatial behavior in off-trail areas of dispersed recreation use.
D'Antonio A; Monz C
J Environ Manage; 2016 Apr; 170():79-87. PubMed ID: 26803258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Enhancing the utility of visitor impact assessment in parks and protected areas: a combined social-ecological approach.
D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
J Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 124():72-81. PubMed ID: 23624424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The efficacy of combined educational and site management actions in reducing off-trail hiking in an urban-proximate protected area.
Hockett KS; Marion JL; Leung YF
J Environ Manage; 2017 Dec; 203(Pt 1):17-28. PubMed ID: 28778002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More than A to B: Understanding and managing visitor spatial behaviour in urban forests using public participation GIS.
Korpilo S; Virtanen T; Saukkonen T; Lehvävirta S
J Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 207():124-133. PubMed ID: 29156435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Improving understanding and management of the complex relationship between visitor motivations and spatial behaviors in parks and protected areas.
Sisneros-Kidd AM; D'Antonio A; Monz C; Mitrovich M
J Environ Manage; 2021 Feb; 280():111841. PubMed ID: 33370670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effects of local ecological knowledge, minimum-impact knowledge, and prior experience on visitor perceptions of the ecological impacts of backcountry recreation.
D'Antonio A; Monz C; Newman P; Lawson S; Taff D
Environ Manage; 2012 Oct; 50(4):542-54. PubMed ID: 22814546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Using crowd-sourced photos to assess seasonal patterns of visitor use in mountain-protected areas.
Walden-Schreiner C; Rossi SD; Barros A; Pickering C; Leung YF
Ambio; 2018 Nov; 47(7):781-793. PubMed ID: 29435731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Mitigating Undesignated Trail Use: The Efficacy of Messaging and Direct Site Management Actions in an Urban-Proximate Open Space Context.
Schwartz F; Taff BD; Lawhon B; VanderWoude D
Environ Manage; 2018 Sep; 62(3):458-473. PubMed ID: 29740681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach.
Oishi Y
Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Spatially characterizing visitor use and its association with informal trails in Yosemite Valley meadows.
Walden-Schreiner C; Leung YF
Environ Manage; 2013 Jul; 52(1):163-78. PubMed ID: 23689790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Networks of Informal Trails Cause Landscape Level Damage to Vegetation.
Barros A; Marina Pickering C
Environ Manage; 2017 Jul; 60(1):57-68. PubMed ID: 28412764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The nature of the pandemic: Exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas.
Ferguson MD; Lynch ML; Evensen D; Ferguson LA; Barcelona R; Giles G; Leberman M
J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100498. PubMed ID: 37521260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting vegetation cover change on the summit of Cadillac Mountain using multi-temporal remote sensing datasets: 1979, 2001, and 2007.
Kim MK; Daigle JJ
Environ Monit Assess; 2011 Sep; 180(1-4):63-75. PubMed ID: 21082342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differences in the impacts of formal and informal recreational trails on urban forest loss and tree structure.
Ballantyne M; Pickering CM
J Environ Manage; 2015 Aug; 159():94-105. PubMed ID: 26058001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Desktop analysis of potential impacts of visitor use: a case study for the highest park in the Southern Hemisphere.
Barros A; Pickering C; Gudes O
J Environ Manage; 2015 Mar; 150():179-195. PubMed ID: 25500135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visitor impacts on trails in the Sagarmatha (Mt. Everest) National Park, Nepal.
Nepal SK; Nepal SA
Ambio; 2004 Aug; 33(6):334-40. PubMed ID: 15387069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An interpretive study of Yosemite National Park visitors' perspectives toward alternative transportation in Yosemite Valley.
White DD
Environ Manage; 2007 Jan; 39(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 17106793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of sampling designs for monitoring recreational trail impacts in Rocky Mountain National Park.
Pettebone D; Newman P; Theobald D
Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 43(3):523-32. PubMed ID: 19184575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding and managing experiential aspects of soundscapes at Muir woods national monument.
Pilcher EJ; Newman P; Manning RE
Environ Manage; 2009 Mar; 43(3):425-35. PubMed ID: 19020928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
