These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26226323)

  • 1. A novel convolution-based approach to address ionization chamber volume averaging effect in model-based treatment planning systems.
    Barraclough B; Li JG; Lebron S; Fan Q; Liu C; Yan G
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Aug; 60(16):6213-26. PubMed ID: 26226323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Technical Note: Impact of the geometry dependence of the ion chamber detector response function on a convolution-based method to address the volume averaging effect.
    Barraclough B; Li JG; Lebron S; Fan Q; Liu C; Yan G
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2081. PubMed ID: 27147320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The extraction of true profiles for TPS commissioning and its impact on IMRT patient-specific QA.
    Yan G; Fox C; Liu C; Li JG
    Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3661-70. PubMed ID: 18777926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Automated beam model optimization.
    Létourneau D; Sharpe MB; Owrangi A; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2010 May; 37(5):2110-20. PubMed ID: 20527544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficient independent planar dose calculation for FFF IMRT QA with a bivariate Gaussian source model.
    Li F; Park JY; Barraclough B; Lu B; Li J; Liu C; Yan G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):125-135. PubMed ID: 28300374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development and clinical evaluation of an ionization chamber array with 3.5 mm pixel pitch for quality assurance in advanced radiotherapy techniques.
    Togno M; Wilkens JJ; Menichelli D; Oechsner M; Perez-Andujar A; Morin O
    Med Phys; 2016 May; 43(5):2283. PubMed ID: 27147340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy dose verification using fluence and portal imaging device.
    Sumida I; Yamaguchi H; Das IJ; Kizaki H; Aboshi K; Tsujii M; Yamada Y; Suzuki O; Seo Y; Isohashi F; Ogawa K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jan; 17(1):259-271. PubMed ID: 26894363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of a three-dimensional (3D) water scanning system for beam commissioning and measurements on a helical tomotherapy unit.
    Peng JL; Ashenafi MS; McDonald DG; Vanek KN
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):4980. PubMed ID: 25679156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Remote Cherenkov imaging-based quality assurance of a magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy system.
    Andreozzi JM; Mooney KE; Brůža P; Curcuru A; Gladstone DJ; Pogue BW; Green O
    Med Phys; 2018 Jun; 45(6):2647-2659. PubMed ID: 29663429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Time-resolved dosimetry using a pinpoint ionization chamber as quality assurance for IMRT and VMAT.
    Louwe RJ; Wendling M; Monshouwer R; Satherley T; Day RA; Greig L
    Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):1625-39. PubMed ID: 25832053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Beam commissioning and measurements validating the beam model in a new TPS that converts helical tomotherapy plans to step-and-shoot IMRT plans.
    Petersson K; Ceberg C; Engström P; Knöös T
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 21361173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
    Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative assessment of the accuracy of dose calculation using pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms and requirements for clinical quality assurance.
    Ali I; Ahmad S
    Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):255-61. PubMed ID: 23558145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment verification in the presence of inhomogeneities using EPID-based three-dimensional dose reconstruction.
    van Elmpt WJ; Nijsten SM; Dekker AL; Mijnheer BJ; Lambin P
    Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2816-26. PubMed ID: 17821989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. VMAT QA: measurement-guided 4D dose reconstruction on a patient.
    Nelms BE; Opp D; Robinson J; Wolf TK; Zhang G; Moros E; Feygelman V
    Med Phys; 2012 Jul; 39(7):4228-38. PubMed ID: 22830756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Characterization of a novel 2D array dosimeter for patient-specific quality assurance with volumetric arc therapy.
    Stathakis S; Myers P; Esquivel C; Mavroidis P; Papanikolaou N
    Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071731. PubMed ID: 23822435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
    Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
    Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Development of an iterative reconstruction method to overcome 2D detector low resolution limitations in MLC leaf position error detection for 3D dose verification in IMRT.
    Visser R; Godart J; Wauben DJ; Langendijk JA; Van't Veld AA; Korevaar EW
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 May; 61(10):3843-56. PubMed ID: 27100169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of the accuracy of 3DVH software estimates of dose to virtual ion chamber and film in composite IMRT QA.
    Olch AJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):81-6. PubMed ID: 22225277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
    Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.