These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26226383)

  • 1. On-the-Fly Integration of Data from a Spin-Diffusion-Based NMR Experiment into Protein-Ligand Docking.
    Onila I; ten Brink T; Fredriksson K; Codutti L; Mazur A; Griesinger C; Carlomagno T; Exner TE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Sep; 55(9):1962-72. PubMed ID: 26226383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Protein-ligand docking guided by ligand pharmacophore-mapping experiment by NMR.
    Fukunishi Y; Mizukoshi Y; Takeuchi K; Shimada I; Takahashi H; Nakamura H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2011 Nov; 31():20-7. PubMed ID: 21940186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A combination of spin diffusion methods for the determination of protein-ligand complex structural ensembles.
    Pilger J; Mazur A; Monecke P; Schreuder H; Elshorst B; Bartoschek S; Langer T; Schiffer A; Krimm I; Wegstroth M; Lee D; Hessler G; Wendt KU; Becker S; Griesinger C
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2015 May; 54(22):6511-5. PubMed ID: 25877959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accounting for conformational variability in protein-ligand docking with NMR-guided rescoring.
    Skjærven L; Codutti L; Angelini A; Grimaldi M; Latek D; Monecke P; Dreyer MK; Carlomagno T
    J Am Chem Soc; 2013 Apr; 135(15):5819-27. PubMed ID: 23565800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Protein-ligand NOE matching: a high-throughput method for binding pose evaluation that does not require protein NMR resonance assignments.
    Constantine KL; Davis ME; Metzler WJ; Mueller L; Claus BL
    J Am Chem Soc; 2006 Jun; 128(22):7252-63. PubMed ID: 16734479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of protein-ligand docking with simulated chemical shift perturbations.
    Ten Brink T; Aguirre C; Exner TE; Krimm I
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Feb; 55(2):275-83. PubMed ID: 25357133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Theoretical analysis of the inter-ligand overhauser effect: a new approach for mapping structural relationships of macromolecular ligands.
    London RE
    J Magn Reson; 1999 Dec; 141(2):301-11. PubMed ID: 10579953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Steering protein-ligand docking with quantitative NMR chemical shift perturbations.
    González-Ruiz D; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Oct; 49(10):2260-71. PubMed ID: 19795907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Epitope mapping and competitive binding of HSA drug site II ligands by NMR diffusion measurements.
    Lucas LH; Price KE; Larive CK
    J Am Chem Soc; 2004 Nov; 126(43):14258-66. PubMed ID: 15506793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Improving docking results via reranking of ensembles of ligand poses in multiple X-ray protein conformations with MM-GBSA.
    Greenidge PA; Kramer C; Mozziconacci JC; Sherman W
    J Chem Inf Model; 2014 Oct; 54(10):2697-717. PubMed ID: 25266271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Protein flexibility in ligand docking and virtual screening to protein kinases.
    Cavasotto CN; Abagyan RA
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Mar; 337(1):209-25. PubMed ID: 15001363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nanodiscs for INPHARMA NMR Characterization of GPCRs: Ligand Binding to the Human A2A Adenosine Receptor.
    Fredriksson K; Lottmann P; Hinz S; Onila I; Shymanets A; Harteneck C; Müller CE; Griesinger C; Exner TE
    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2017 May; 56(21):5750-5754. PubMed ID: 28429411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Overview of Probing Protein-Ligand Interactions Using NMR.
    Aguirre C; Cala O; Krimm I
    Curr Protoc Protein Sci; 2015 Aug; 81():17.18.1-17.18.24. PubMed ID: 26237672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How much NMR data is required to determine a protein-ligand complex structure?
    Schieborr U; Vogtherr M; Elshorst B; Betz M; Grimme S; Pescatore B; Langer T; Saxena K; Schwalbe H
    Chembiochem; 2005 Oct; 6(10):1891-8. PubMed ID: 16013076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating binding affinities by docking/scoring methods using variable protonation states.
    Park MS; Gao C; Stern HA
    Proteins; 2011 Jan; 79(1):304-14. PubMed ID: 21058298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Lessons in molecular recognition: the effects of ligand and protein flexibility on molecular docking accuracy.
    Erickson JA; Jalaie M; Robertson DH; Lewis RA; Vieth M
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jan; 47(1):45-55. PubMed ID: 14695819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NMR in natural products: understanding conformation, configuration and receptor interactions.
    Carlomagno T
    Nat Prod Rep; 2012 May; 29(5):536-54. PubMed ID: 22456471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. INPHARMA-Based Determination of Ligand Binding Modes at α
    Vaid TM; Chalmers DK; Scott DJ; Gooley PR
    Chemistry; 2020 Sep; 26(51):11796-11805. PubMed ID: 32291801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of ligand binding modes in weak protein-ligand complexes using sparse NMR data.
    Mohanty B; Williams ML; Doak BC; Vazirani M; Ilyichova O; Wang G; Bermel W; Simpson JS; Chalmers DK; King GF; Mobli M; Scanlon MJ
    J Biomol NMR; 2016 Nov; 66(3):195-208. PubMed ID: 27778134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.