These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26227148)
1. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. Rücker G; Schwarzer G BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Jul; 15():58. PubMed ID: 26227148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Predictive P-score for treatment ranking in Bayesian network meta-analysis. Rosenberger KJ; Duan R; Chen Y; Lin L BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):213. PubMed ID: 34657593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Immunoenhancing enteral and parenteral nutrition for gastrointestinal surgery: a multiple-treatments meta-analysis. Mazaki T; Ishii Y; Murai I Ann Surg; 2015 Apr; 261(4):662-9. PubMed ID: 25405556 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simulation-based estimation of mean and standard deviation for meta-analysis via Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC). Kwon D; Reis IM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2015 Aug; 15():61. PubMed ID: 26264850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of Bayesian and frequentist methods in random-effects network meta-analysis of binary data. Seide SE; Jensen K; Kieser M Res Synth Methods; 2020 May; 11(3):363-378. PubMed ID: 31955519 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative efficacy of mitochondrial agents for bipolar disorder during depressive episodes: a network meta-analysis using frequentist and Bayesian approaches. Maiti R; Mishra A; Mishra BR; Jena M Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2021 Dec; 238(12):3347-3356. PubMed ID: 34751803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses. Mbuagbaw L; Rochwerg B; Jaeschke R; Heels-Andsell D; Alhazzani W; Thabane L; Guyatt GH Syst Rev; 2017 Apr; 6(1):79. PubMed ID: 28403893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Uncertainty in Treatment Rankings: Reanalysis of Network Meta-analyses of Randomized Trials. Trinquart L; Attiche N; Bafeta A; Porcher R; Ravaud P Ann Intern Med; 2016 May; 164(10):666-73. PubMed ID: 27089537 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative efficacy and safety of tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide as induction therapy for lupus nephritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lee YH; Song GG Lupus; 2015 Dec; 24(14):1520-8. PubMed ID: 26162684 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Using Normalized Entropy to Measure Uncertainty of Rankings for Network Meta-analyses. Wu YC; Shih MC; Tu YK Med Decis Making; 2021 Aug; 41(6):706-713. PubMed ID: 33754893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An empirical comparison of Bayesian modelling strategies for missing binary outcome data in network meta-analysis. Spineli LM BMC Med Res Methodol; 2019 Apr; 19(1):86. PubMed ID: 31018836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The rank-heat plot is a novel way to present the results from a network meta-analysis including multiple outcomes. Veroniki AA; Straus SE; Fyraridis A; Tricco AC J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Aug; 76():193-9. PubMed ID: 26939929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A network meta-analysis on comparative efficacy and all-cause discontinuation of antimanic treatments in acute bipolar mania. Yildiz A; Nikodem M; Vieta E; Correll CU; Baldessarini RJ Psychol Med; 2015 Jan; 45(2):299-317. PubMed ID: 25036226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A multilevel approach to network meta-analysis within a frequentist framework. Greco T; Edefonti V; Biondi-Zoccai G; Decarli A; Gasparini M; Zangrillo A; Landoni G Contemp Clin Trials; 2015 May; 42():51-9. PubMed ID: 25804722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Bayesian nonparametric models for ranked set sampling. Gemayel N; Stasny EA; Wolfe DA Lifetime Data Anal; 2015 Apr; 21(2):315-29. PubMed ID: 25326663 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robust meta-analytic conclusions mandate the provision of prediction intervals in meta-analysis summaries. Graham PL; Moran JL J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 May; 65(5):503-10. PubMed ID: 22265586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The uptake of Bayesian methods in biomedical meta-analyses: A scoping review (2005-2016). Grant RL J Evid Based Med; 2019 Feb; 12(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 30511364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis and Indirect Comparisons: on Methods, Paradigms, and Biologic Treatments for Psoriasis. Puig L Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed); 2021 Mar; 112(3):203-215. PubMed ID: 33053367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]