BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2622726)

  • 1. Comparison of paragraph comprehension test scores with reading versus listening-reading and multiple-choice versus nominal recall administration techniques: justification for the bypass approach.
    Weinberg WA; McLean A; Snider RL; Rintelmann JW; Brumback RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Dec; 69(3 Pt 2):1131-5. PubMed ID: 2622726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of reading and listening-reading techniques for administration of PIAT Reading Comprehension subtest: justification for the bypass approach.
    Weinberg WA; McLean A; Brumback RA
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):672-4. PubMed ID: 3399347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Naturalistic memory in learning-disabled and skilled readers.
    Swanson HL; Reffel J; Trahan M
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1991 Apr; 19(2):117-47. PubMed ID: 2056160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Identifying children with specific reading disabilities from listening and reading discrepancy scores.
    Spring C; French L
    J Learn Disabil; 1990 Jan; 23(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 2295871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Individual differences in story comprehension and recall of poor readers.
    Wilkinson IA; Elkins J; Bain JD
    Br J Educ Psychol; 1995 Dec; 65 ( Pt 4)():393-407. PubMed ID: 8580046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can reading disabilities be diagnosed without using intelligence tests?
    Aaron PG
    J Learn Disabil; 1991 Mar; 24(3):178-86, 191. PubMed ID: 2026959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effectiveness of a Partial Read-Aloud Test Accommodation to Assess Reading Comprehension in Students With a Reading Disability.
    Giusto M; Ehri LC
    J Learn Disabil; 2019; 52(3):259-270. PubMed ID: 30035685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Metamemorial knowledge of good and poor readers: a developmental perspective.
    Feldt RC; Witte KL
    J Genet Psychol; 1987 Dec; 148(4):415-26. PubMed ID: 3437269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An evaluation of the discrepancy definition of dyslexia.
    Siegel LS
    J Learn Disabil; 1992 Dec; 25(10):618-29. PubMed ID: 1460383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparing two modes of teaching a question-answering strategy for enhancing reading comprehension: didactic and self-instructional training.
    Graham L; Wong BY
    J Learn Disabil; 1993 Apr; 26(4):270-9. PubMed ID: 8515191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of mode of presentation on comprehension of below average, average and above average readers.
    Ganschow L; Weber DB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1987 Jun; 64(3 Pt 1):899-905. PubMed ID: 3601609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Speech perception and memory coding in relation to reading ability.
    Brady S; Shankweiler D; Mann V
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1983 Apr; 35(2):345-67. PubMed ID: 6842131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Reading text aloud benefits memory but not comprehension.
    Roberts BRT; Hu ZS; Curtis E; Bodner GE; McLean D; MacLeod CM
    Mem Cognit; 2024 Jan; 52(1):57-72. PubMed ID: 37440162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. What learning-disabled readers fail to retrieve on verbal dichotic tests: a problem of encoding, retrieval, or storage?
    Swanson HL
    J Abnorm Child Psychol; 1987 Sep; 15(3):339-60. PubMed ID: 3668083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessment of inference-making in children using comprehension questions and story retelling: Effect of text modality and a story presentation format.
    Freed J; Cain K
    Int J Lang Commun Disord; 2021 May; 56(3):637-652. PubMed ID: 34028960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The use of think-aloud protocols to compare inferencing abilities in average and below-average readers.
    Laing SP; Kamhi AG
    J Learn Disabil; 2002; 35(5):436-47. PubMed ID: 15490540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Disabled readers: their intellectual and perceptual capacities at differing ages.
    Miller JW; McKenna MC
    Percept Mot Skills; 1981 Apr; 52(2):467-72. PubMed ID: 7255059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic and visual memory codes in learning disabled readers.
    Swanson HL
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1984 Feb; 37(1):124-40. PubMed ID: 6707573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Verbal and nonverbal auditory processing among left- and right-handed good readers and reading-disabled children.
    Obrzut JE; Conrad PF; Boliek CA
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(11-12):1357-71. PubMed ID: 2615936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.