615 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26228895)
21. Combined vaginal-cesarean delivery of twins: risk factors and neonatal outcome--a single center experience.
Aviram A; Weiser I; Ashwal E; Bar J; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Mar; 28(5):509-14. PubMed ID: 24853342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Trial of labour compared to elective Caesarean in twin gestations with a previous Caesarean delivery.
Delaney T; Young DC
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2003 Apr; 25(4):289-92. PubMed ID: 12679820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. [Analysis of scoring system of twin pregnancy vaginal delivery].
Shen N; Fan L
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2020 May; 55(5):312-316. PubMed ID: 32464718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Elective induction of labour increases caesarean section rate in low risk multiparous women.
Jacquemyn Y; Michiels I; Martens G
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2012 Apr; 32(3):257-9. PubMed ID: 22369399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Planning the mode of delivery for twin pregnancies: A web-based questionnaire.
Goossens SM; Roumen FJ; Derks JB; Kessels FG; Dirksen CD; Nijhuis JG
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2016; 36(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 26367456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Twin delivery with the first twin in breech position. A study of 137 continuous cases].
Bourtembourg A; Ramanah R; Jolly M; Gannard-Pechin E; Becher P; Cossa S; Mulin B; Maillet R; Riethmuller D
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2012 Apr; 41(2):174-81. PubMed ID: 22118807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Vaginal birth after one previous Caesarean section--evaluation of predictive factors.
Ola ER; Imosemi OD; Abudu OO
Afr J Med Med Sci; 2001; 30(1-2):61-6. PubMed ID: 14510153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Indications for first caesarean and delivery mode in subsequent trial of labour.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Ekström P; Källén K
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 27(1):72-80. PubMed ID: 23215714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mode of delivery after one caesarean section: audit of current practice in a health region.
Paterson CM; Saunders NJ
BMJ; 1991 Oct; 303(6806):818-21. PubMed ID: 1932972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Is gestational age an independent variable affecting uterine scar rupture rates?
Kiran TS; Chui YK; Bethel J; Bhal PS
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2006 May; 126(1):68-71. PubMed ID: 16221523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Obstetric consequences of subfertility: a retrospective cohort study.
DoPierala AL; Bhatta S; Raja EA; Bhattacharya S; Bhattacharya S
BJOG; 2016 Jul; 123(8):1320-8. PubMed ID: 26335260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prenatal risk factors for Caesarean section. Analyses of the ALSPAC cohort of 12,944 women in England.
Patel RR; Peters TJ; Murphy DJ;
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Apr; 34(2):353-67. PubMed ID: 15659468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Cesarean delivery or induction of labor in pre-labor twin gestations: a secondary analysis of the twin birth study.
Dougan C; Gotha L; Melamed N; Aviram A; Asztalos EV; Anabusi S; Willan AR; Barrett J; Mei-Dan E
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Nov; 20(1):702. PubMed ID: 33203367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [The analysis of twin pregnancy and labour in the Department of Obstetrics, Medical Academy, Gdańsk].
Preis K; Swiatkowska-Freund M; Kulikowska-Ciecielag K; Gościniak W
Ginekol Pol; 2005 Mar; 76(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 16018140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Influence of timing of admission in labour and management of labour on method of birth: results from a randomised controlled trial of caseload midwifery (COSMOS trial).
Davey MA; McLachlan HL; Forster D; Flood M
Midwifery; 2013 Dec; 29(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 23890679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Neonatal and maternal outcomes in twin gestations > or =32 weeks according to the planned mode of delivery.
Haest KM; Roumen FJ; Nijhuis JG
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2005 Nov; 123(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16260335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Predictors of perinatal outcomes and economic costs for late-term induction of labour.
Oros D; Garcia-Simon R; Clemente J; Fabre E; Romero MA; Montañes A
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jun; 56(3):286-290. PubMed ID: 28600035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of planned caesarean delivery and planned vaginal delivery in women with a twin pregnancy: A nation wide cohort study.
Goossens SMTA; Ensing S; van der Hoeven MAHBM; Roumen FJME; Nijhuis JG; Mol BW
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2018 Feb; 221():97-104. PubMed ID: 29277048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Twin Birth Study: 2-year neurodevelopmental follow-up of the randomized trial of planned cesarean or planned vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy.
Asztalos EV; Hannah ME; Hutton EK; Willan AR; Allen AC; Armson BA; Gafni A; Joseph KS; Ohlsson A; Ross S; Sanchez JJ; Mangoff K; Barrett JF
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Mar; 214(3):371.e1-371.e19. PubMed ID: 26830380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Vaginal delivery after previous caesarean section for failure of second stage of labour.
Jongen VH; Halfwerk MG; Brouwer WK
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1998 Oct; 105(10):1079-81. PubMed ID: 9800930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
