These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26229619)

  • 1. Retrospective evaluation of exposure index (EI) values from plain radiographs reveals important considerations for quality improvement.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Robinson J; Lewis SJ; Moran B
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2013 Dec; 60(4):115-22. PubMed ID: 26229619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Are exposure index values consistent in clinical practice? A multi-manufacturer investigation.
    Butler ML; Rainford L; Last J; Brennan PC
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):371-4. PubMed ID: 20223849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. THE CONSISTENCY OF EXPOSURE INDICATOR VALUES IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY SYSTEMS.
    Jamil A; Mohd MI; Zain NM
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2018 Dec; 182(4):413-418. PubMed ID: 29767799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exposure creep in computed radiography: a longitudinal study.
    Gibson DJ; Davidson RA
    Acad Radiol; 2012 Apr; 19(4):458-62. PubMed ID: 22225727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of digital radiography practice using exposure index tracking.
    Scott AW; Zhou Y; Allahverdian J; Nute JL; Lee C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):343-355. PubMed ID: 27929507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exposure index in digital radiography: initial results of awareness and knowledge from Nigerian digital radiography practices.
    Esien-Umo EO; Erim AE; Chiaghanam NO; Ogbu T; Ijever AW; Archibong BE; Osakwe CA; Ekpo EU
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2023 Mar; 54(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 36456458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Current state of practice regarding digital radiography exposure indicators and deviation indices: Report of AAPM Imaging Physics Committee Task Group 232.
    Dave JK; Jones AK; Fisher R; Hulme K; Rill L; Zamora D; Woodward A; Brady S; MacDougall RD; Goldman L; Lang S; Peck D; Apgar B; Shepard SJ; Uzenoff R; Willis C
    Med Phys; 2018 Nov; 45(11):e1146-e1160. PubMed ID: 30255505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring the reliability of the exposure index with a range of kV and mAs values: An experimental study.
    van Schoonhoven MT; Hayre DCM; England DA
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2021 Dec; 52(4):559-566. PubMed ID: 34602372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The New Exposure Indicator for Digital Radiography.
    Seeram E
    J Med Imaging Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 45(2):144-158. PubMed ID: 31051946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Method of determining technique from weight and height to achieve targeted detector exposures in portable chest and abdominal digital radiography.
    Hoerner M; Grizzard K; Moroz J
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13582. PubMed ID: 35262265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Digital radiography exposure indices: A review.
    Mothiram U; Brennan PC; Lewis SJ; Moran B; Robinson J
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2014 Jun; 61(2):112-8. PubMed ID: 26229645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method to derive appropriate exposure parameters from target exposure index and patient thickness in pediatric digital radiography.
    Zhang M; Liu K; Niu X; Liu X
    Pediatr Radiol; 2013 Mar; 43(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 23208532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient dose and associated exposure parameters in pelvic x-ray examinations: dependence on radiographic system.
    Welarathna S; Velautham S; Sarasanandarajah S
    Radiat Environ Biophys; 2024 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 39020221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of new patient dose management tool in digital radiography: Using clinical exposure index data of mobile chest radiography in a large university hospital.
    Park H; Kim J; Kang EJ; Kim Y; Jo H; Heo JH; Yang W; Yoon Y
    Heliyon; 2023 Oct; 9(10):e20760. PubMed ID: 37860502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparative study between mobile computed radiography and mobile flat-panel radiography for bedside chest radiography: impact of an antiscatter grid on the visibility of selected diagnostically relevant structures.
    Lehnert T; Naguib NN; Wutzler S; Bauer RW; Kerl JM; Burkhard T; Schulz B; Larson MC; Ackermann H; Vogl TJ; Balzer JO
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Jan; 49(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 24019019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are the target exposure index and deviation index used efficiently?
    Guðjónsdóttir J; Paalsson KE; Sveinsdóttir GP
    Radiography (Lond); 2021 Aug; 27(3):903-907. PubMed ID: 33707050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. LOW BMI PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY.
    Efthymiou FO; Metaxas VI; Dimitroukas CP; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2020 Jul; 189(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 32043128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Retrospective evaluation of exposure indicators: a pilot study of exposure technique in digital radiography.
    Lewis S; Pieterse T; Lawrence H
    J Med Radiat Sci; 2019 Mar; 66(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 30834686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. PATIENT DOSE IN DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY UTILISING BMI CLASSIFICATION.
    Metaxas VI; Messaris GA; Lekatou AN; Petsas TG; Panayiotakis GS
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2019 Aug; 184(2):155-167. PubMed ID: 30452729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Technical note: Four-year experience with utilization of DICOM metadata analytics in clinical digital radiography practice.
    Long Z; Walz-Flannigan AI; Littrell LA; Schueler BA
    Med Phys; 2023 Feb; 50(2):831-836. PubMed ID: 36542418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.