BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26230311)

  • 21. Orchid pollination by sexual deception: pollinator perspectives.
    Gaskett AC
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2011 Feb; 86(1):33-75. PubMed ID: 20377574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Curves as traits: genetic and environmental variation in mate preference functions.
    Rodríguez RL; Hallett AC; Kilmer JT; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Feb; 26(2):434-42. PubMed ID: 23252651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The role of mate-choice copying in speciation and hybridization.
    Varela SAM; Matos M; Schlupp I
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2018 May; 93(2):1304-1322. PubMed ID: 29417719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. CONVERGENT EVOLUTION OF COURTSHIP SONGS AMONG CRYPTIC SPECIES OF THE CARNEA GROUP OF GREEN LACEWINGS (NEUROPTERA: CHRYSOPIDAE: CHRYSOPERLA).
    Henry CS; Wells MLM; Simon CM
    Evolution; 1999 Aug; 53(4):1165-1179. PubMed ID: 28565530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Mate Choice Drives Evolutionary Stability in a Hybrid Complex.
    Morgado-Santos M; Pereira HM; Vicente L; Collares-Pereira MJ
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0132760. PubMed ID: 26181664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pervasive reinforcement and the role of sexual selection in biological speciation.
    Hudson EJ; Price TD
    J Hered; 2014; 105 Suppl 1():821-33. PubMed ID: 25149257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Sexual imprinting and speciation between two Peromyscus species.
    Delaney EK; Hoekstra HE
    Evolution; 2018 Feb; 72(2):274-287. PubMed ID: 29231989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Experience-mediated plasticity in mate preferences: mating assurance in a variable environment.
    Fowler-Finn KD; Rodríguez RL
    Evolution; 2012 Feb; 66(2):459-68. PubMed ID: 22276541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Temperature coupling of mate attraction signals and female mate preferences in four populations of Enchenopa treehopper (Hemiptera: Membracidae).
    Jocson DMI; Smeester ME; Leith NT; Macchiano A; Fowler-Finn KD
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Oct; 32(10):1046-1056. PubMed ID: 31278803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evidence that female preferences have shaped male signal evolution in a clade of specialized plant-feeding insects.
    Rodríguez RL; Ramaswamy K; Cocroft RB
    Proc Biol Sci; 2006 Oct; 273(1601):2585-93. PubMed ID: 17002943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene.
    Naisbit RE; Jiggins CD; Mallet J
    Proc Biol Sci; 2001 Sep; 268(1478):1849-54. PubMed ID: 11522205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Life history comparison of two green lacewing species Chrysoperla johnsoni and Chrysoperla carnea (Neuroptera: Chrysopidae).
    Amarasekare KG; Shearer PW
    Environ Entomol; 2013 Oct; 42(5):1079-84. PubMed ID: 24331618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Experimental confirmation that body size determines mate preference via phenotype matching in a stickleback species pair.
    Conte GL; Schluter D
    Evolution; 2013 May; 67(5):1477-84. PubMed ID: 23617922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Divergence of a speciation trait through artificial selection: Insights into constraints, by-product effects and sexual isolation.
    Yukilevich R; LaGraff JT
    J Evol Biol; 2023 Feb; 36(2):355-367. PubMed ID: 36576691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Multiple genetic linkages between female preference and male signal in rapidly speciating Hawaiian crickets.
    Wiley C; Shaw KL
    Evolution; 2010 Aug; 64(8):2238-45. PubMed ID: 20394669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. What initiates speciation in passion-vine butterflies?
    McMillan WO; Jiggins CD; Mallet J
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1997 Aug; 94(16):8628-33. PubMed ID: 9238028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Reinforcement of mate preference among hybridizing Heliconius butterflies.
    Kronforst MR; Young LG; Gilbert LE
    J Evol Biol; 2007 Jan; 20(1):278-85. PubMed ID: 17210020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila montana: geographic variation, sexual dimorphism and potential roles as pheromones.
    Jennings JH; Etges WJ; Schmitt T; Hoikkala A
    J Insect Physiol; 2014 Feb; 61():16-24. PubMed ID: 24373710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The dynamics of sexually antagonistic coevolution and the complex influences of mating system and genetic correlation.
    Härdling R; Karlsson K
    J Theor Biol; 2009 Sep; 260(2):276-82. PubMed ID: 19500598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.