These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26230746)

  • 1. Risk-taking on the road and in the mind: behavioural and neural patterns of decision making between risky and safe drivers.
    Ba Y; Zhang W; Peng Q; Salvendy G; Crundall D
    Ergonomics; 2016; 59(1):27-38. PubMed ID: 26230746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Angry Drivers Take Risky Decisions: Evidence from Neurophysiological Assessment.
    Li S; Zhang T; Sawyer BD; Zhang W; Hancock PA
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 May; 16(10):. PubMed ID: 31096546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How reinforcement sensitivity and perceived risk influence young drivers' reported engagement in risky driving behaviors.
    Harbeck EL; Glendon AI
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 May; 54():73-80. PubMed ID: 23474239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reduced risk avoidance and altered neural correlates of feedback processing in patients with borderline personality disorder.
    Endrass T; Schuermann B; Roepke S; Kessler-Scheil S; Kathmann N
    Psychiatry Res; 2016 Sep; 243():14-22. PubMed ID: 27344588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision- and feedback-related brain potentials reveal risk processing mechanisms in patients with alcohol use disorder.
    Sehrig S; Weiss A; Miller GA; Rockstroh B
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Dec; 56(12):e13450. PubMed ID: 31380569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Age differences in neural correlates of feedback processing after economic decisions under risk.
    Fernandes C; Pasion R; Gonçalves AR; Ferreira-Santos F; Barbosa F; Martins IP; Marques-Teixeira J
    Neurobiol Aging; 2018 May; 65():51-59. PubMed ID: 29407466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introducing a multi-variate classification method: Risky driving acceptance among different heterogeneous driver sub-cultures.
    Timmermans CPM; Alhajyaseen WKM; Ross V; Nakamura H
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():81-91. PubMed ID: 32563411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessments of risky driving: a Go/No-Go simulator driving task to evaluate risky decision-making and associated behavioral patterns.
    Ba Y; Zhang W; Salvendy G; Cheng AS; Ventsislavova P
    Appl Ergon; 2016 Jan; 52():265-74. PubMed ID: 26360218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contextual valence modulates the neural dynamics of risk processing.
    Zheng Y; Li Q; Wang K; Wu H; Liu X
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Jul; 52(7):895-904. PubMed ID: 25664392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Self-regulation differences across learner and probationary drivers: The impact on risky driving behaviours.
    Watson-Brown N; Senserrick T; Freeman J; Davey J; Scott-Parker B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 May; 154():106064. PubMed ID: 33721731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessing Willingness to Engage in Risky Driving Behaviour Using Naturalistic Driving Footage: The Role of Age and Gender.
    Ventsislavova P; Crundall D; Garcia-Fernandez P; Castro C
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Sep; 18(19):. PubMed ID: 34639528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Young driver risky behaviour and predictors of crash risk in Australia, New Zealand and Colombia: Same but different?
    Scott-Parker B; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Feb; 99(Pt A):30-38. PubMed ID: 27865138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Event-related potentials in response to feedback following risk-taking in the hot version of the Columbia Card Task.
    de Groot K; van Strien JW
    Psychophysiology; 2019 Sep; 56(9):e13390. PubMed ID: 31069812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electrophysiological brain indices of risk behavior modification induced by contingent feedback.
    Megías A; Torres MA; Catena A; Cándido A; Maldonado A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2018 Feb; 124():43-53. PubMed ID: 29330008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impulsivity and risky decision making among taxi drivers in Hong Kong: An event-related potential study.
    Cheng ASK; Ting KH; Liu KPY; Ba Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt B):387-394. PubMed ID: 26748873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Acute effects of alcohol on feedback processing and outcome evaluation during risky decision-making: an ERP study.
    Euser AS; van Meel CS; Snelleman M; Franken IH
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2011 Sep; 217(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 21475971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fast and furious: A neglected issue in health promotion among young drivers.
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Scott-Parker B
    Health Promot J Austr; 2019 Sep; 30(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30465690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of feedback processing in decision-making under risk.
    Schuermann B; Endrass T; Kathmann N
    Front Hum Neurosci; 2012; 6():204. PubMed ID: 22783182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Neurocognitive and behavioral markers in DUI recidivists.
    Terranova C; Tagliabue M; Cona G; Gianfranchi E; Di Pietra L; Vidotto G; Montisci M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S185-S189. PubMed ID: 31674802
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of sensitivity to reward and punishment, propensity for sensation seeking, depression, and anxiety on the risky behaviour of novice drivers: a path model.
    Scott-Parker B; Watson B; King MJ; Hyde MK
    Br J Psychol; 2012 May; 103(2):248-67. PubMed ID: 22506749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.