These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26230747)

  • 1. Individual identification from genetic marker data: developments and accuracy comparisons of methods.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 Jan; 16(1):163-75. PubMed ID: 26230747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Triadic IBD coefficients and applications to estimating pairwise relatedness.
    Wang J
    Genet Res; 2007 Jun; 89(3):135-53. PubMed ID: 17894908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating pairwise relatedness in a small sample of individuals.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 Nov; 119(5):302-313. PubMed ID: 28853716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The computer program structure for assigning individuals to populations: easy to use but easier to misuse.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2017 Sep; 17(5):981-990. PubMed ID: 28028941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimation of migration rates from marker-based parentage analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2014 Jul; 23(13):3191-213. PubMed ID: 24863365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relative accuracy of three common methods of parentage analysis in natural populations.
    Harrison HB; Saenz-Agudelo P; Planes S; Jones GP; Berumen ML
    Mol Ecol; 2013 Feb; 22(4):1158-70. PubMed ID: 23278953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimating pairwise relatedness from dominant genetic markers.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2004 Oct; 13(10):3169-78. PubMed ID: 15367129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pedigrees or markers: Which are better in estimating relatedness and inbreeding coefficient?
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2016 Feb; 107():4-13. PubMed ID: 26344786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Neighbour joining trees, dominant markers and population genetic structure.
    Hollingsworth PM; Ennos RA
    Heredity (Edinb); 2004 Jun; 92(6):490-8. PubMed ID: 15026781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The use of the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm for maximum likelihood estimation of gametic frequencies of multilocus polymorphic codominant systems based on sampled population data].
    Sergeev AS; Arapova RK
    Genetika; 2002 Mar; 38(3):407-18. PubMed ID: 11963570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. COANCESTRY: a program for simulating, estimating and analysing relatedness and inbreeding coefficients.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2011 Jan; 11(1):141-5. PubMed ID: 21429111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors.
    Wang J
    Genetics; 2004 Apr; 166(4):1963-79. PubMed ID: 15126412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Maximum likelihood estimation of individual inbreeding coefficients and null allele frequencies.
    Hall N; Mercer L; Phillips D; Shaw J; Anderson AD
    Genet Res (Camb); 2012 Jun; 94(3):151-61. PubMed ID: 22805896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Multilocus estimation of pairwise relatedness with dominant markers.
    Ritland K
    Mol Ecol; 2005 Sep; 14(10):3157-65. PubMed ID: 16101781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.
    Nicolae DL
    Genet Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 30(8):703-17. PubMed ID: 16986163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Clumpak: a program for identifying clustering modes and packaging population structure inferences across K.
    Kopelman NM; Mayzel J; Jakobsson M; Rosenberg NA; Mayrose I
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2015 Sep; 15(5):1179-91. PubMed ID: 25684545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Parentage and sibship inference from markers in polyploids.
    Wang J; Scribner KT
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2014 May; 14(3):541-53. PubMed ID: 24299450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maximum-likelihood estimation of allelic dropout and false allele error rates from microsatellite genotypes in the absence of reference data.
    Johnson PC; Haydon DT
    Genetics; 2007 Feb; 175(2):827-42. PubMed ID: 17179070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The program structure does not reliably recover the correct population structure when sampling is uneven: subsampling and new estimators alleviate the problem.
    Puechmaille SJ
    Mol Ecol Resour; 2016 May; 16(3):608-27. PubMed ID: 26856252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.