These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Experimental bit commitment based on quantum communication and special relativity. Lunghi T; Kaniewski J; Bussières F; Houlmann R; Tomamichel M; Kent A; Gisin N; Wehner S; Zbinden H Phys Rev Lett; 2013 Nov; 111(18):180504. PubMed ID: 24237497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. 24-Hour Relativistic Bit Commitment. Verbanis E; Martin A; Houlmann R; Boso G; Bussières F; Zbinden H Phys Rev Lett; 2016 Sep; 117(14):140506. PubMed ID: 27740788 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental unconditionally secure bit commitment. Liu Y; Cao Y; Curty M; Liao SK; Wang J; Cui K; Li YH; Lin ZH; Sun QC; Li DD; Zhang HF; Zhao Y; Chen TY; Peng CZ; Zhang Q; Cabello A; Pan JW Phys Rev Lett; 2014 Jan; 112(1):010504. PubMed ID: 24483878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Summoning, No-Signalling and Relativistic Bit Commitments. Kent A Entropy (Basel); 2019 May; 21(5):. PubMed ID: 33267248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cheat sensitive quantum bit commitment. Hardy L; Kent A Phys Rev Lett; 2004 Apr; 92(15):157901. PubMed ID: 15169319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Security of quantum bit string commitment depends on the information measure. Buhrman H; Christandl M; Hayden P; Lo HK; Wehner S Phys Rev Lett; 2006 Dec; 97(25):250501. PubMed ID: 17280334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental plug and play quantum coin flipping. Pappa A; Jouguet P; Lawson T; Chailloux A; Legré M; Trinkler P; Kerenidis I; Diamanti E Nat Commun; 2014 Apr; 5():3717. PubMed ID: 24758868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Arbitrarily Long Relativistic Bit Commitment. Chakraborty K; Chailloux A; Leverrier A Phys Rev Lett; 2015 Dec; 115(25):250501. PubMed ID: 26722908 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantum bit string commitment. Kent A Phys Rev Lett; 2003 Jun; 90(23):237901. PubMed ID: 12857289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semi-Counterfactual Quantum Bit Commitment Protocol. Song Y; Yang L Sci Rep; 2020 Apr; 10(1):6531. PubMed ID: 32300159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Unconditionally secure bit commitment by transmitting measurement outcomes. Kent A Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Sep; 109(13):130501. PubMed ID: 23030073 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An Information-Theoretic Perspective on the Quantum Bit Commitment Impossibility Theorem. Nagy M; Nagy N Entropy (Basel); 2018 Mar; 20(3):. PubMed ID: 33265284 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quantum key distribution with classical Bob. Boyer M; Kenigsberg D; Mor T Phys Rev Lett; 2007 Oct; 99(14):140501. PubMed ID: 17930654 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complete insecurity of quantum protocols for classical two-party computation. Buhrman H; Christandl M; Schaffner C Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Oct; 109(16):160501. PubMed ID: 23215060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Knowledge-Concealing Evidencing of Knowledge About a Quantum State. Adlam E; Kent A Phys Rev Lett; 2018 Feb; 120(5):050501. PubMed ID: 29481210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution for two independent parties. Xin J; Lu XM; Li X; Li G Opt Express; 2020 Apr; 28(8):11439-11450. PubMed ID: 32403655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Key distribution based on synchronization in bandwidth-enhanced random bit generators with dynamic post-processing. Xue C; Jiang N; Qiu K; Lv Y Opt Express; 2015 Jun; 23(11):14510-9. PubMed ID: 26072811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Controlled bidirectional quantum secure direct communication. Chou YH; Lin YT; Zeng GJ; Lin FJ; Chen CY ScientificWorldJournal; 2014; 2014():694798. PubMed ID: 25006596 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]