These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26231247)

  • 1. Estimation of dynamic functional connectivity using Multiplication of Temporal Derivatives.
    Shine JM; Koyejo O; Bell PT; Gorgolewski KJ; Gilat M; Poldrack RA
    Neuroimage; 2015 Nov; 122():399-407. PubMed ID: 26231247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the pros and cons of using temporal derivatives to assess brain functional connectivity.
    Ochab JK; Tarnowski W; Nowak MA; Chialvo DR
    Neuroimage; 2019 Jan; 184():577-585. PubMed ID: 30267855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sparse temporally dynamic resting-state functional connectivity networks for early MCI identification.
    Wee CY; Yang S; Yap PT; Shen D;
    Brain Imaging Behav; 2016 Jun; 10(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 26123390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of global signal regression on characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states.
    Xu H; Su J; Qin J; Li M; Zeng LL; Hu D; Shen H
    Neuroimage; 2018 Jun; 173():127-145. PubMed ID: 29476914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Estimating dynamic brain functional networks using multi-subject fMRI data.
    Kundu S; Ming J; Pierce J; McDowell J; Guo Y
    Neuroimage; 2018 Dec; 183():635-649. PubMed ID: 30048750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Time-varying correlation coefficients estimation and its application to dynamic connectivity analysis of fMRI.
    Fu Z; Di X; Chan SC; Hung YS; Biswal BB; Zhang Z
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():2944-7. PubMed ID: 24110344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sliding window correlation analysis: Modulating window shape for dynamic brain connectivity in resting state.
    Mokhtari F; Akhlaghi MI; Simpson SL; Wu G; Laurienti PJ
    Neuroimage; 2019 Apr; 189():655-666. PubMed ID: 30721750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Unified Estimation Framework for State-Related Changes in Effective Brain Connectivity.
    Samdin SB; Ting CM; Ombao H; Salleh SH
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2017 Apr; 64(4):844-858. PubMed ID: 27323355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Towards a statistical test for functional connectivity dynamics.
    Zalesky A; Breakspear M
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jul; 114():466-70. PubMed ID: 25818688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On spurious and real fluctuations of dynamic functional connectivity during rest.
    Leonardi N; Van De Ville D
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jan; 104():430-6. PubMed ID: 25234118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Probabilistic framework for brain connectivity from functional MR images.
    Rajapakse JC; Wang Y; Zheng X; Zhou J
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2008 Jun; 27(6):825-33. PubMed ID: 18541489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing the connectivity between regions of interest: an approach based on cluster Granger causality for fMRI data analysis.
    Sato JR; Fujita A; Cardoso EF; Thomaz CE; Brammer MJ; Amaro E
    Neuroimage; 2010 Oct; 52(4):1444-55. PubMed ID: 20472076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Time-dependence of graph theory metrics in functional connectivity analysis.
    Chiang S; Cassese A; Guindani M; Vannucci M; Yeh HJ; Haneef Z; Stern JM
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 125():601-615. PubMed ID: 26518632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of sliding window correlation performance for characterizing dynamic functional connectivity and brain states.
    Shakil S; Lee CH; Keilholz SD
    Neuroimage; 2016 Jun; 133():111-128. PubMed ID: 26952197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dynamic functional connectivity using state-based dynamic community structure: method and application to opioid analgesia.
    Robinson LF; Atlas LY; Wager TD
    Neuroimage; 2015 Mar; 108():274-91. PubMed ID: 25534114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Efficacy of different dynamic functional connectivity methods to capture cognitively relevant information.
    Xie H; Zheng CY; Handwerker DA; Bandettini PA; Calhoun VD; Mitra S; Gonzalez-Castillo J
    Neuroimage; 2019 Mar; 188():502-514. PubMed ID: 30576850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential Covariance: A New Method to Estimate Functional Connectivity in fMRI.
    Lin TW; Chen Y; Bukhari Q; Krishnan GP; Bazhenov M; Sejnowski TJ
    Neural Comput; 2020 Dec; 32(12):2389-2421. PubMed ID: 32946714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Detecting functional connectivity in fMRI using PCA and regression analysis.
    Zhong Y; Wang H; Lu G; Zhang Z; Jiao Q; Liu Y
    Brain Topogr; 2009 Sep; 22(2):134-44. PubMed ID: 19408112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Wavelet-based clustering of resting state MRI data in the rat.
    Medda A; Hoffmann L; Magnuson M; Thompson G; Pan WJ; Keilholz S
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Jan; 34(1):35-43. PubMed ID: 26481903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An average sliding window correlation method for dynamic functional connectivity.
    Vergara VM; Abrol A; Calhoun VD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2019 May; 40(7):2089-2103. PubMed ID: 30659699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.