BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

969 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26231301)

  • 41. MTA pulpotomy as an alternative to root canal treatment in children's permanent teeth in a dental public health setting.
    Alqaderi HE; Al-Mutawa SA; Qudeimat MA
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1390-5. PubMed ID: 24973732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. A randomized trial of resin-based restorations in class I and class II beveled preparations in primary molars: 24-month results.
    dos Santos MP; Passos M; Luiz RR; Maia LC
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Feb; 140(2):156-66; quiz 247-8. PubMed ID: 19188412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Clinical performance of pulpotomized primary molars restored with resin-based materials. 24-month results.
    Cehreli ZC; Cetinguc A; Cengiz SB; Altay AN
    Am J Dent; 2006 Oct; 19(5):262-6. PubMed ID: 17073200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Caries removal in deciduous teeth using an Er:YAG laser: a randomized split-mouth clinical trial.
    Valério RA; Borsatto MC; Serra MC; Polizeli SA; Nemezio MA; Galo R; Aires CP; Dos Santos AC; Corona SA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Jan; 20(1):65-73. PubMed ID: 25877234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Split mouth randomized controlled clinical trial of beveled cavity preparations in primary molars: an 18-Month follow up.
    Oliveira CA; Dias PF; Dos Santos MP; Maia LC
    J Dent; 2008 Sep; 36(9):754-8. PubMed ID: 18579283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Permeability evaluation after decay removal in primary teeth with current caries-excavation techniques.
    Shabzendedar M; Moosavi H; Talbi M; Sharifi M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Nov; 12(6):441-6. PubMed ID: 22269234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Longevity of posterior restorations in primary teeth: results from a paediatric dental clinic.
    Pinto Gdos S; Oliveira LJ; Romano AR; Schardosim LR; Bonow ML; Pacce M; Correa MB; Demarco FF; Torriani DD
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1248-54. PubMed ID: 25150105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Clinical evaluation of atraumatic restorations in primary molars: a comparison between 2 glass ionomer cements.
    Menezes JP; Rosenblatt A; Medeiros E
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 16948370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Clinical effectiveness of alkasite versus nanofilled resin composite in the restoration of occlusal carious lesions in permanent molar teeth of children: a randomized clinical trial.
    Sharma H; Suprabha BS; Shenoy R; Rao A; Kotian H
    Eur Arch Paediatr Dent; 2023 Jun; 24(3):301-311. PubMed ID: 36947344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Stainless steel crown versus modified open-sandwich restorations for primary molars: a 2-year randomized clinical trial.
    Atieh M
    Int J Paediatr Dent; 2008 Sep; 18(5):325-32. PubMed ID: 18328050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Management of extensive carious lesions in permanent molars of a child with nonmetallic bonded restorations--a case report.
    el-Mowafy O
    J Can Dent Assoc; 2000 Jun; 66(6):302-7. PubMed ID: 10927895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Indirect pulp treatment: in vivo outcomes of an adhesive resin system vs calcium hydroxide for protection of the dentin-pulp complex.
    Falster CA; Araujo FB; Straffon LH; Nör JE
    Pediatr Dent; 2002; 24(3):241-8. PubMed ID: 12064499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Clinical aspects of restorative treatment in the primary dentition.
    Varpio M
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1993; 96():1-47. PubMed ID: 8310420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up.
    Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M
    J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Clinical evaluation of a flowable resin composite and flowable compomer for preventive resin restorations.
    Qin M; Liu H
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(5):580-7. PubMed ID: 16268391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. [Endodontic treatment of primary teeth. Pulp exposure and pulp necrosis].
    Gruythuysen RJ
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 2005 Nov; 112(11):441-6. PubMed ID: 16320568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Marginal integrity and secondary caries of selectively excavated teeth in vitro.
    Schwendicke F; Kern M; Blunck U; Dörfer C; Drenck J; Paris S
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1261-8. PubMed ID: 25132367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Use of bulk fill resin composite and universal adhesive for restoring primary teeth after selective carious tissue removal to soft dentin: A randomized clinical trial.
    Massa MG; Trentin GA; Noal FC; Franzon R; Lenzi TL; de Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2022 Apr; 35(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 35506965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Clinical evaluation of glass-ionomer tunnel restorations in primary molars: 36 months results.
    Markovic D; Peric T
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Mar; 53(1):41-5. PubMed ID: 18304240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 49.