These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26231302)
1. Seal, replacement or monitoring amalgam restorations with occlusal marginal defects? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. Moncada G; Fernández E; Mena K; Martin J; Vildósola P; De Oliveira Junior OB; Estay J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1371-8. PubMed ID: 26231302 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Longitudinal results of a 10-year clinical trial of repair of amalgam restorations. Moncada G; Vildósola P; Fernández E; Estay J; de Oliveira Júnior OB; de Andrade MF; Martin J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV Oper Dent; 2015; 40(1):34-43. PubMed ID: 25100406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing the longevity of restorations by minimal intervention: a two-year clinical trial. Moncada G; Fernández E; Martín J; Arancibia C; Mjör IA; Gordan VV Oper Dent; 2008; 33(3):258-64. PubMed ID: 18505215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Minimal invasive treatment for defective restorations: five-year results using sealants. Martin J; Fernandez E; Estay J; Gordan VV; Mjor IA; Moncada G Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 22788726 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term Performance of Refurbished Amalgam Restorations: 10-year Follow-up. Moncada G; Fernandez E; Mena K; Vildosola P; Estay J; de Oliveira OB; Martin J; Mjör IA; Gordan VV Oral Health Prev Dent; 2017; 15(5):435-445. PubMed ID: 28785746 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Survival rate of sealed, refurbished and repaired defective restorations: 4-year follow-up. Fernández EM; Martin JA; Angel PA; Mjör IA; Gordan VV; Moncada GA Braz Dent J; 2011; 22(2):134-9. PubMed ID: 21537587 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sealing of restorations with marginal defects does not affect their longevity. Estay J; Martin J; Vildósola P; Villablanca C; Mjör I; de Oliveira OB; Laske M; Loomans B; de Andrade MF; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Opdam N; Fernández E Am J Dent; 2018 Apr; 31(2):107-112. PubMed ID: 29630796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations: results of a seven-year clinical study. Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mondragon E; Garvan CW; Mjör IA J Am Dent Assoc; 2011 Jul; 142(7):842-9. PubMed ID: 21719808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. 2-year clinical evaluation of alternative treatments to replacement of defective amalgam restorations. Gordan VV; Riley JL; Blaser PK; Mjör IA Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):418-25. PubMed ID: 16924981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Two-year clinical evaluation of repair versus replacement of composite restorations. Gordan VV; Shen C; Riley J; Mjör IA J Esthet Restor Dent; 2006; 18(3):144-53; discussion 154. PubMed ID: 16831187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Can repair increase the longevity of composite resins? Results of a 10-year clinical trial. Fernández E; Martín J; Vildósola P; Oliveira Junior OB; Gordan V; Mjor I; Bersezio C; Estay J; de Andrade MF; Moncada G J Dent; 2015 Feb; 43(2):279-86. PubMed ID: 24907560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Sealing, refurbishment and repair of Class I and Class II defective restorations: a three-year clinical trial. Moncada G; Martin J; Fernández E; Hempel MC; Mjör IA; Gordan VV J Am Dent Assoc; 2009 Apr; 140(4):425-32. PubMed ID: 19339531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical longevity of extensive direct composite restorations in amalgam replacement: up to 3.5 years follow-up. Scholtanus JD; Ozcan M J Dent; 2014 Nov; 42(11):1404-10. PubMed ID: 24994619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical success of compomer and amalgam restorations in primary molars. Follow up in 36 months. Daou MH; Attin T; Göhring TN Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed; 2009; 119(11):1082-8. PubMed ID: 20020589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. 12 Years of Repair of Amalgam and Composite Resins: A Clinical Study. Estay J; Martín J; Viera V; Valdivieso J; Bersezio C; Vildosola P; Mjor IA; Andrade MF; Moraes RR; Moncada G; Gordan VV; Fernández E Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 28976841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months. Browning WD; Johnson WW; Gregory PN J Am Dent Assoc; 2000 May; 131(5):607-11. PubMed ID: 10832254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative treatments for resin-based composite and amalgam restorations with marginal defects: a 12-month clinical trial. Moncada GC; Martin J; Fernandez E; Vildosola PG; Caamano C; Caro MJ; Mjor IA; Gordan VV Gen Dent; 2006; 54(5):314-8. PubMed ID: 17004564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validity of staining and marginal ditching as criteria for diagnosis of secondary caries around occlusal amalgam restorations: an in vitro study. Magalhães CS; Freitas AB; Moreira AN; Ferreira EF Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 20069254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Preventive resin restorations vs. amalgam restorations: a three-year clinical study. Cloyd S; Gilpatrick RO; Moore D J Tenn Dent Assoc; 1997 Oct; 77(4):36-40. PubMed ID: 9520761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]