110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26232371)
1. Parsimonious Description of Glucose Variability in Type 2 Diabetes by Sparse Principal Component Analysis.
Fabris C; Facchinetti A; Fico G; Sambo F; Arredondo MT; Cobelli C;
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul; 10(1):119-24. PubMed ID: 26232371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sparse Principal Component Analysis for the parsimonious description of glucose variability in diabetes.
Fabris C; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2014; 2014():6643-6. PubMed ID: 25571519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Glucose variability indices in type 1 diabetes: parsimonious set of indices revealed by sparse principal component analysis.
Fabris C; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Zanon M; Guerra S; Maran A; Cobelli C
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2014 Oct; 16(10):644-52. PubMed ID: 24956070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simple Linear Support Vector Machine Classifier Can Distinguish Impaired Glucose Tolerance Versus Type 2 Diabetes Using a Reduced Set of CGM-Based Glycemic Variability Indices.
Longato E; Acciaroli G; Facchinetti A; Maran A; Sparacino G
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2020 Mar; 14(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 30931604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Diabetes and Prediabetes Classification Using Glycemic Variability Indices From Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data.
Acciaroli G; Sparacino G; Hakaste L; Facchinetti A; Di Nunzio GM; Palombit A; Tuomi T; Gabriel R; Aranda J; Vega S; Cobelli C
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2018 Jan; 12(1):105-113. PubMed ID: 28569077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glucose Variability: A Review of Clinical Applications and Research Developments.
Rodbard D
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(S2):S25-S215. PubMed ID: 29916742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The continuous spectrum of glycaemic variability changes with pancreatic islet function: A multicentre cross-sectional study in China.
Zhang L; Guo K; Tian Q; Ye J; Ding Z; Zhou Q; Wu J; Fan L; Pan N; Niu X; Zhao Q; Ma Y; Jiang H; Huang G; Li X; Zhou Z; Yang L
Diabetes Metab Res Rev; 2022 Nov; 38(8):e3579. PubMed ID: 36214297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Glucose Variability Assessed with Continuous Glucose Monitoring: Reliability, Reference Values, and Correlations with Established Glycemic Indices-The Maastricht Study.
Foreman YD; Brouwers MCGJ; van der Kallen CJH; Pagen DME; van Greevenbroek MMJ; Henry RMA; Koster A; Wesselius A; Schaper NC; Stehouwer CDA
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 May; 22(5):395-403. PubMed ID: 31886732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Glycaemic variability-based classification of impaired glucose tolerance vs. type 2 diabetes using continuous glucose monitoring data.
Longato E; Acciaroli G; Facchinetti A; Hakaste L; Tuomi T; Maran A; Sparacino G
Comput Biol Med; 2018 May; 96():141-146. PubMed ID: 29573667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Use of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Youth-Onset Type 2 Diabetes.
Chan CL
Curr Diab Rep; 2017 Sep; 17(9):66. PubMed ID: 28726154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Are Risk Indices Derived From CGM Interchangeable With SMBG-Based Indices?
Fabris C; Patek SD; Breton MD
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Aug; 10(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 26275643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. How Should We Assess Glycemic Variability in Type 1 Diabetes? Contribution of Principal Component Analysis for Interstitial Glucose Indices in 142 Children.
Guilmin-Crépon S; Carel JC; Schroedt J; Scornet E; Alberti C; Tubiana-Rufi N
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2018 Jun; 20(6):440-447. PubMed ID: 29923773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Relationships between glucose variability and conventional measures of glycemic control in continuously monitored patients with type 2 diabetes.
Kohnert KD; Vogt L; Augstein P; Heinke P; Zander E; Peterson K; Freyse EJ; Salzsieder E
Horm Metab Res; 2009 Feb; 41(2):137-41. PubMed ID: 19214924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diabetes technology and treatments in the paediatric age group.
Shalitin S; Peter Chase H
Int J Clin Pract Suppl; 2011 Feb; (170):76-82. PubMed ID: 21323816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Glucose Variability: Comparison of Different Indices During Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Diabetic Patients.
Le Floch JP; Kessler L
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Jul; 10(4):885-91. PubMed ID: 26880391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of a New Measure for Assessing Glucose Monitoring Device-Related Treatment Satisfaction and Quality of Life.
Polonsky WH; Fisher L; Hessler D; Edelman SV
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Sep; 17(9):657-63. PubMed ID: 25923812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Characterization of Daily Glycemic Variability in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Using a Mixture of Metrics.
Zheng F; Jalbert M; Forbes F; Bonnet S; Wojtusciszyn A; Lablanche S; Benhamou PY
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2020 Apr; 22(4):301-313. PubMed ID: 31657620
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Retrofitting of continuous glucose monitoring traces allows more accurate assessment of glucose control in outpatient studies.
Del Favero S; Facchinetti A; Sparacino G; Cobelli C;
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 May; 17(5):355-63. PubMed ID: 25671379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Exploring the Frequency Domain of Continuous Glucose Monitoring Signals to Improve Characterization of Glucose Variability and of Diabetic Profiles.
Fico G; Hernández L; Cancela J; Isabel MM; Facchinetti A; Fabris C; Gabriel R; Cobelli C; Arredondo Waldmeyer MT
J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2017 Jul; 11(4):773-779. PubMed ID: 28627250
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quantifying temporal glucose variability in diabetes via continuous glucose monitoring: mathematical methods and clinical application.
Kovatchev BP; Clarke WL; Breton M; Brayman K; McCall A
Diabetes Technol Ther; 2005 Dec; 7(6):849-62. PubMed ID: 16386091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
