These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

292 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26232833)

  • 21. Mounting partially edentulous casts.
    McGill ST; Holmes JR
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(5):592-5. PubMed ID: 20945752
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Computer aided analysis of digitized dental stone replicas by dental CAD/CAM technology.
    Persson AS; Andersson M; Odén A; Sandborgh-Englund G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Aug; 24(8):1123-30. PubMed ID: 18336900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A clinical evaluation of materials for interocclusal registration in centric relation.
    Pagnano VO; Bezzon OL; de Mattos MG; Ribeiro RF
    Braz Dent J; 2000; 11(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 11213793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The use of a wax bite wafer and a double computed tomography scan procedure to obtain a three-dimensional augmented virtual skull model.
    Swennen GR; Mommaerts MY; Abeloos J; De Clercq C; Lamoral P; Neyt N; Casselman J; Schutyser F
    J Craniofac Surg; 2007 May; 18(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 17538314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An In Vitro Study of Condylar Displacement Caused by Interocclusal Records: Influence of Recording Material, Storage Time, and Recording Technique.
    Ghazal M; Hedderich J; Kern M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):587-593. PubMed ID: 26833815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Reproducibility of interocclusal recording for mandibular removable partial denture in bilateral distal extension cases.
    Togano H; Hideshima M; Ohyama T
    J Med Dent Sci; 2003 Mar; 50(1):53-61. PubMed ID: 12715920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27.
    Sonkesriya S; Subramanian D; Saha P; Roy P; Panda S; Reddy U; Baig MM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Dec; 24(12):936-939. PubMed ID: 38317389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of impression volume and double-arch trays on the registration of maximum intercuspation.
    Hahn SM; Millstein PL; Kinnunen TH; Wright RF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 19961994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical use of a direct chairside oral scanner: an assessment of accuracy, time, and patient acceptance.
    Grünheid T; McCarthy SD; Larson BE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):673-82. PubMed ID: 25439218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Accuracy and reproducibility of 3-dimensional digital model measurements.
    Sousa MV; Vasconcelos EC; Janson G; Garib D; Pinzan A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Aug; 142(2):269-73. PubMed ID: 22858338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Accuracy of three interocclusal recording materials used to mount a working cast.
    Breeding LC; Dixon DL; Kinderknecht KE
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Mar; 71(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 8164168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Clinical factors and clinical variation influencing the reproducibility of interocclusal recording methods.
    Eriksson A; Ockert-Eriksson G; Lockowandt P; Eriksson O
    Br Dent J; 2002 Apr; 192(7):395-400; discussion 391. PubMed ID: 12017459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of a three-dimensional dentition model digitized from an interocclusal record using a non-contact surface scanner.
    Kihara T; Yoshimi Y; Taji T; Murayama T; Tanimoto K; Nikawa H
    Eur J Orthod; 2016 Aug; 38(4):435-9. PubMed ID: 26378085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A comparative study to evaluate the discrepancy in condylar guidance values between two commercially available arcon and non-arcon articulators: a clinical study.
    Goyal MK; Goyal S
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):880. PubMed ID: 22484898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of vertical accuracy of interocclusal recording materials.
    Ghazal M; Ludwig K; Habil RN; Kern M
    Quintessence Int; 2008 Oct; 39(9):727-32. PubMed ID: 19093044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Three-dimensional analysis of the accuracy of conventional and completely digital interocclusal registration methods.
    Ries JM; Grünler C; Wichmann M; Matta RE
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Nov; 128(5):994-1000. PubMed ID: 33888327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [The centric relation. III. Usefulness of 3 interocclusal registration materials during mounting of the models on an articulator].
    Lavigne J; Lucchini JP; Spirgi M; Meyer JM
    SSO Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnheilkd; 1977 Jan; 87(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 264701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. An experimental study of vertical deviations induced by different interocclusal recording materials.
    Müller J; Götz G; Bruckner G; Kraft E
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jan; 65(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 2033543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Polymerization shrinkage strain of interocclusal recording materials.
    Chun JH; Pae A; Kim SH
    Dent Mater; 2009 Jan; 25(1):115-20. PubMed ID: 18614226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations.
    Iwaki Y; Wakabayashi N; Igarashi Y
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 23092147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.