These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26232833)

  • 41. Dimensional accuracy of optical bite registration in single and multiple unit restorations.
    Iwaki Y; Wakabayashi N; Igarashi Y
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(3):309-15. PubMed ID: 23092147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part I: consistency prior to setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Mar; 13(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 15032895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Static Interocclusal Registration by Three Intraoral Scanner Systems.
    Wong KY; Esguerra RJ; Chia VAP; Tan YH; Tan KBC
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29160904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. An experimental study on particular physical properties of several interocclusal recording media. Part III: resistance to compression after setting.
    Michalakis KX; Pissiotis A; Anastasiadou V; Kapari D
    J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):233-7. PubMed ID: 15610544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Dimensional and occlusal accuracy of a novel three-dimensional digital model of articulated dental arches.
    Tanaka Y; Hattori Y
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(3):282-7. PubMed ID: 23626985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Three-dimensional digital dental model based on micro-CT].
    Li YX; Bai YX; Wei CF
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jan; 46(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 21418947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of check-bite registration and centric condylar position.
    Utz KH; Müller F; Lückerath W; Fuss E; Koeck B
    J Oral Rehabil; 2002 May; 29(5):458-66. PubMed ID: 12028494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Comparison of accuracy in digital and conventional cross-mounting.
    Luu D; Kan E; Kim SW; Lee JD; Lee SJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Oct; 132(4):784-791. PubMed ID: 36473749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Differential accuracy of elastomeric recording materials and associated weight change.
    Millstein PL; Hsu CC
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Apr; 71(4):400-3. PubMed ID: 8196007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. An easy technique to obtain articulated casts using the palate for the interocclusal record.
    Rodrigues DM; Fernandes FH; Orsi IA; Bezzon OL
    J Prosthodont; 2010 Apr; 19(3):245-6. PubMed ID: 20180899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. An investigation of the rheological properties of several interocclusal registration materials.
    Chai J; Leong DK; Pang IC
    J Prosthodont; 1994 Sep; 3(3):134-7. PubMed ID: 7874254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [The representation of interocclusal record materials to dentate patients. Critical study on dental casts].
    Murakami M; Itoh H; Yoneda M; Higashi H; Yoshida M; Kawano J
    Gifu Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1983 Aug; 11(1):170-80. PubMed ID: 6582128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Simulation of dental collisions and occlusal dynamics in the virtual environment.
    Stavness IK; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Zhang X
    J Oral Rehabil; 2016 Apr; 43(4):269-78. PubMed ID: 26685912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. A study of the surface hardness and dimensional stability of several intermaxillary registration materials.
    Chai J; Tan E; Pang IC
    Int J Prosthodont; 1994; 7(6):538-42. PubMed ID: 7748448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Methods for minimizing the errors in mandibular model mounting on an articulator.
    Adrien P; Schouver J
    J Oral Rehabil; 1997 Dec; 24(12):929-35. PubMed ID: 9467996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Factors influencing optical 3D scanning of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    DeLong R; Pintado MR; Ko CC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthodont; 2001 Jun; 10(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 11512112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The accuracy of virtual interocclusal registration during intraoral scanning.
    Edher F; Hannam AG; Tobias DL; Wyatt CCL
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Dec; 120(6):904-912. PubMed ID: 29961618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Relative contributions of occlusion, maximum bite force, and chewing cycle kinematics to masticatory performance.
    Lepley CR; Throckmorton GS; Ceen RF; Buschang PH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 May; 139(5):606-13. PubMed ID: 21536203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Optimal Use of Physical Centric Relation Records for Digital Workflows.
    Osnes C; Patel J; Wagstaff A; Ferrari M; Keeling A
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2021 Nov; 29(4):223-229. PubMed ID: 34218536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.