189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233031)
21. Acoustic Sources of Accent in Second Language Japanese Speech.
Idemaru K; Wei P; Gubbins L
Lang Speech; 2019 Jun; 62(2):333-357. PubMed ID: 29764295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Talker-listener accent interactions in speech-in-noise recognition: effects of prosodic manipulation as a function of language experience.
Pinet M; Iverson P
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Sep; 128(3):1357-65. PubMed ID: 20815470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Focus perception in Japanese: Effects of lexical accent and focus location.
Lee A; Chiu F; Xu Y
PLoS One; 2022; 17(9):e0274176. PubMed ID: 36137111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. The f0 perturbation effects in focus marking: Evidence from Korean and Japanese.
Chen S; Hong Y; Li B; Chun E
PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0283139. PubMed ID: 36952566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The role of tonal onglides in German nuclear pitch accents.
Ritter S; Grice M
Lang Speech; 2015 Mar; 58(Pt 1):114-28. PubMed ID: 25935940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The perception of intonation questions and statements in Cantonese.
Ma JK; Ciocca V; Whitehill TL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Feb; 129(2):1012-23. PubMed ID: 21361457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. When pitch Accents Encode Speaker Commitment: Evidence from French Intonation.
Michelas A; Portes C; Champagne-Lavau M
Lang Speech; 2016 Jun; 59(Pt 2):266-93. PubMed ID: 27363256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A Tale of Two Features: Perception of Cantonese Lexical Tone and English Lexical Stress in Cantonese-English Bilinguals.
Tong X; Lee SM; Lee MM; Burnham D
PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0142896. PubMed ID: 26606073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Identification of Minimal Pairs of Japanese Pitch Accent in Noise-Vocoded Speech.
Sugiyama Y
Front Psychol; 2022; 13():887761. PubMed ID: 35712147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Acoustic cues to perception of word stress by English, Mandarin, and Russian speakers.
Chrabaszcz A; Winn M; Lin CY; Idsardi WJ
J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2014 Aug; 57(4):1468-79. PubMed ID: 24686836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The relationship between native allophonic experience with vowel duration and perception of the English tense/lax vowel contrast by Spanish and Russian listeners.
Kondaurova MV; Francis AL
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Dec; 124(6):3959. PubMed ID: 19206820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Speaker and Accent Variation Are Handled Differently: Evidence in Native and Non-Native Listeners.
Kriengwatana B; Terry J; Chládková K; Escudero P
PLoS One; 2016; 11(6):e0156870. PubMed ID: 27309889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The role of f0 shape and phrasal position in Papuan Malay and American English word identification.
Kaland C; Gordon MK
Phonetica; 2022 Jun; 79(3):219-245. PubMed ID: 35981718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss.
Gordon-Salant S; Yeni-Komshian GH; Fitzgibbons PJ
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):444-55. PubMed ID: 20649238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Individual differences in processing non-speech acoustic signals influence cue weighting strategies for L2 speech contrasts.
Liu X
J Psycholinguist Res; 2022 Aug; 51(4):903-916. PubMed ID: 35320458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The Perception of Mandarin Lexical Tones by Native Speakers of Burmese.
Tsukada K; Kondo M
Lang Speech; 2019 Dec; 62(4):625-640. PubMed ID: 30343621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cue-specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English.
Francis AL; Kaganovich N; Driscoll-Huber C
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Aug; 124(2):1234-51. PubMed ID: 18681610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Age-related perceptual difference of Kyungsang Korean accent contrast: A diachronic observation.
Lee H
J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Nov; 144(5):EL367. PubMed ID: 30522281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effects of musicality and language background on cue integration in pitch perception.
Cui A; Kuang J
J Acoust Soc Am; 2019 Dec; 146(6):4086. PubMed ID: 31893734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Prosodic boundary information modulates phonetic categorization.
Kim S; Cho T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL19-25. PubMed ID: 23862901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
