These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
737 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233173)
1. Semiautomated head-and-neck IMRT planning using dose warping and scaling to robustly adapt plans in a knowledge database containing potentially suboptimal plans. Schmidt M; Lo JY; Grzetic S; Lutzky C; Brizel DM; Das SK Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4428-34. PubMed ID: 26233173 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Can knowledge-based DVH predictions be used for automated, individualized quality assurance of radiotherapy treatment plans? Tol JP; Dahele M; Delaney AR; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF Radiat Oncol; 2015 Nov; 10():234. PubMed ID: 26584574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. Yuan L; Ge Y; Lee WR; Yin FF; Kirkpatrick JP; Wu QJ Med Phys; 2012 Nov; 39(11):6868-78. PubMed ID: 23127079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dose-shaping using targeted sparse optimization. Sayre GA; Ruan D Med Phys; 2013 Jul; 40(7):071711. PubMed ID: 23822415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. Moore KL; Brame RS; Low DA; Mutic S Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Oct; 81(2):545-51. PubMed ID: 21277097 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Modeling the dosimetry of organ-at-risk in head and neck IMRT planning: an intertechnique and interinstitutional study. Lian J; Yuan L; Ge Y; Chera BS; Yoo DP; Chang S; Yin F; Wu QJ Med Phys; 2013 Dec; 40(12):121704. PubMed ID: 24320490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A method for a priori estimation of best feasible DVH for organs-at-risk: Validation for head and neck VMAT planning. Ahmed S; Nelms B; Gintz D; Caudell J; Zhang G; Moros EG; Feygelman V Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5486-5497. PubMed ID: 28777469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detailed evaluation of an automated approach to interactive optimization for volumetric modulated arc therapy plans. Tol JP; Dahele M; Delaney AR; Doornaert P; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF Med Phys; 2016 Apr; 43(4):1818. PubMed ID: 27036579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dependence of achievable plan quality on treatment technique and planning goal refinement: a head-and-neck intensity modulated radiation therapy application. Qi XS; Ruan D; Lee SP; Pham A; Kupelian P; Low DA; Steinberg M; Demarco J Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(4):817-24. PubMed ID: 25752396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures. Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images. Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A dosimetric comparison of the use of equally spaced beam (ESB), beam angle optimization (BAO), and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in head and neck cancers treated by intensity modulated radiotherapy. Leung WS; Wu VWC; Liu CYW; Cheng ACK J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Nov; 20(11):121-130. PubMed ID: 31593367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. Tol JP; Delaney AR; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2015 Mar; 91(3):612-20. PubMed ID: 25680603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of organ-at-risk sparing and plan robustness for spot-scanning proton therapy and volumetric modulated arc photon therapy in head-and-neck cancer. Barten DL; Tol JP; Dahele M; Slotman BJ; Verbakel WF Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6589-98. PubMed ID: 26520750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. Wu B; Ricchetti F; Sanguineti G; Kazhdan M; Simari P; Jacques R; Taylor R; McNutt T Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Mar; 79(4):1241-7. PubMed ID: 20800382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing 3DCRT and inversely optimized IMRT planning for head and neck cancer: equivalence between step-and-shoot and sliding window techniques. Longobardi B; De Martin E; Fiorino C; Dell'oca I; Broggi S; Cattaneo GM; Calandrino R Radiother Oncol; 2005 Nov; 77(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 16260056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. PTV-based IMPT optimization incorporating planning risk volumes vs robust optimization. Liu W; Frank SJ; Li X; Li Y; Zhu RX; Mohan R Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021709. PubMed ID: 23387732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Knowledge-based radiation therapy (KBRT) treatment planning versus planning by experts: validation of a KBRT algorithm for prostate cancer treatment planning. Nwankwo O; Mekdash H; Sihono DS; Wenz F; Glatting G Radiat Oncol; 2015 May; 10():111. PubMed ID: 25957871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Dosimetry analysis of intensity-modulated and conformal radiation therapy for head and neck tumors]. Pesznyák C; Béla D; Takácsi-Nagy Z; Major T; Polgár C Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 26035156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]