BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233189)

  • 1. Phase-based vascular input function: Improved quantitative DCE-MRI of atherosclerotic plaques.
    van Hoof RH; Hermeling E; Truijman MT; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Daemen JW; van der Geest RJ; van Orshoven NP; Schreuder AH; Backes WH; Daemen MJ; Wildberger JE; Kooi ME
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4619-28. PubMed ID: 26233189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Pharmacokinetic analysis of prostate cancer using independent component analysis.
    Mehrabian H; Da Rosa M; Haider MA; Martel AL
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Dec; 33(10):1236-1245. PubMed ID: 26297961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vessel wall and adventitial DCE-MRI parameters demonstrate similar correlations with carotid plaque microvasculature on histology.
    van Hoof RHM; Vöö SA; Sluimer JC; Wijnen NJA; Hermeling E; Schreuder FHBM; Truijman MTB; Cleutjens JPM; Daemen MJAP; Daemen JH; van Oostenbrugge RJ; Mess WH; Wildberger JE; Heeneman S; Kooi ME
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Oct; 46(4):1053-1059. PubMed ID: 28152245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of individual and population-derived vascular input functions for quantitative DCE-MRI in rats.
    Hormuth DA; Skinner JT; Does MD; Yankeelov TE
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):397-401. PubMed ID: 24556502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of carotid atherosclerotic plaque: model selection, reproducibility, and validation.
    Gaens ME; Backes WH; Rozel S; Lipperts M; Sanders SN; Jaspers K; Cleutjens JP; Sluimer JC; Heeneman S; Daemen MJ; Welten RJ; Daemen JW; Wildberger JE; Kwee RM; Kooi ME
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):271-9. PubMed ID: 23151823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of carotid plaque vulnerability in vivo: Correlation between dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI and MRI-modified AHA classification.
    Ge X; Zhou Z; Zhao H; Li X; Sun B; Suo S; Hackett ML; Wan J; Xu J; Liu X
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Sep; 46(3):870-876. PubMed ID: 28120364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantifying Intracranial Plaque Permeability with Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI: A Pilot Study.
    Vakil P; Elmokadem AH; Syed FH; Cantrell CG; Dehkordi FH; Carroll TJ; Ansari SA
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):243-249. PubMed ID: 27856437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Vascular input function correction of inflow enhancement for improved pharmacokinetic modeling of liver DCE-MRI.
    Ning J; Schubert T; Johnson KM; Roldán-Alzate A; Chen H; Yuan C; Reeder SB
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Jun; 79(6):3093-3102. PubMed ID: 29124781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in tumor-bearing rats and mice with inversion recovery TrueFISP and two contrast agents at 4.7 T.
    Weidensteiner C; Rausch M; McSheehy PM; Allegrini PR
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Sep; 24(3):646-56. PubMed ID: 16878308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Development of a dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT.
    Driscoll B; Keller H; Coolens C
    Med Phys; 2011 Aug; 38(8):4866-80. PubMed ID: 21928658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI to Study Atherosclerotic Plaque Microvasculature.
    van Hoof RH; Heeneman S; Wildberger JE; Kooi ME
    Curr Atheroscler Rep; 2016 Jun; 18(6):33. PubMed ID: 27115144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reproducibility of the gadolinium concentration measurements and of the fitting parameters of the vascular input function in the superior sagittal sinus in a patient population.
    Lavini C; Verhoeff JJ
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Dec; 28(10):1420-30. PubMed ID: 20817379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surrogate vascular input function measurements from the superior sagittal sinus are repeatable and provide tissue-validated kinetic parameters in brain DCE-MRI.
    Lewis D; Zhu X; Coope DJ; Zhao S; King AT; Cootes T; Jackson A; Li KL
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8737. PubMed ID: 35610281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro pharmacokinetic phantom for two-compartment modeling in DCE-MRI.
    Wahyulaksana G; Saporito S; den Boer JA; Herold IHF; Mischi M
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205012. PubMed ID: 30238927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Absolute quantification of regional renal blood flow in swine by dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging using a blood pool contrast agent.
    Lüdemann L; Nafz B; Elsner F; Grosse-Siestrup C; Meissler M; Kaufels N; Rehbein H; Persson PB; Michaely HJ; Lengsfeld P; Voth M; Gutberlet M
    Invest Radiol; 2009 Mar; 44(3):125-34. PubMed ID: 19151609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subject-Specific Fully-Coupled and One-Way Fluid-Structure Interaction Models for Modeling of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques in Humans.
    Tao X; Gao P; Jing L; Lin Y; Sui B
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 Oct; 21():3279-90. PubMed ID: 26510514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimization of the Contrast Agent Injection Protocol for Carotid Artery Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Wang Y; Liu X; Wang Y; Qi H; Liu X; Kong X; Zhang Q; Dou J; Wang J; Chen H
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Nov; 56(5):1372-1381. PubMed ID: 35324034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of carotid plaque stability based on the dynamic enhancement pattern in plaque components with multidetector CT angiography.
    Horie N; Morikawa M; Ishizaka S; Takeshita T; So G; Hayashi K; Suyama K; Nagata I
    Stroke; 2012 Feb; 43(2):393-8. PubMed ID: 22096033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. High-resolution MRI of carotid plaque with a neurovascular coil and contrast-enhanced MR angiography: one-stop shopping for the comprehensive assessment of carotid atherosclerosis.
    Tartari S; Rizzati R; Righi R; Deledda A; Capello K; Soverini R; Benea G
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 May; 196(5):1164-71. PubMed ID: 21512087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Semiquantitative and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging measurements predict radiation response in cervix cancer.
    Zahra MA; Tan LT; Priest AN; Graves MJ; Arends M; Crawford RA; Brenton JD; Lomas DJ; Sala E
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Jul; 74(3):766-73. PubMed ID: 19019563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.