535 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233219)
1. Influence of source batch S dispersion on dosimetry for prostate cancer treatment with permanent implants.
Nuñez-Cumplido E; Perez-Calatayud J; Casares-Magaz O; Hernandez-Armas J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4933-40. PubMed ID: 26233219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Dosimetric evaluation of high-dose-rate interstitial brachytherapy boost treatments for localized prostate cancer.
Fröhlich G; Agoston P; Lövey J; Somogyi A; Fodor J; Polgár C; Major T
Strahlenther Onkol; 2010 Jul; 186(7):388-95. PubMed ID: 20582396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy consistently results in high quality dosimetry.
White EC; Kamrava MR; Demarco J; Park SJ; Wang PC; Kayode O; Steinberg ML; Demanes DJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Feb; 85(2):543-8. PubMed ID: 22652111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensitivity of low energy brachytherapy Monte Carlo dose calculations to uncertainties in human tissue composition.
Landry G; Reniers B; Murrer L; Lutgens L; Gurp EB; Pignol JP; Keller B; Beaulieu L; Verhaegen F
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5188-98. PubMed ID: 21089752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of the MIM Symphony treatment planning system for low-dose-rate- prostate brachytherapy.
Dhanesar SK; Lim TY; Du W; Bruno TL; Frank SJ; Kudchadker RJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):62–75. PubMed ID: 26699290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Loose versus stranded seeds in permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric comparison of intraoperative plans.
Major T; Agoston P; Fröhlich G; Baricza K; Szabo Z; Jorgo K; Herein A; Polgar C
Phys Med; 2014 Dec; 30(8):909-13. PubMed ID: 25175151
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dosimetric comparison between model 9011 and 6711 sources in prostate implants.
Zhang H; Beyer D
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(2):199-203. PubMed ID: 23510715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of the radial function on I-125 seeds used for permanent prostate implantation.
Pickett B; Pouliot J
Med Dosim; 2004; 29(3):204-9. PubMed ID: 15324917
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of permanent interstitial prostate brachytherapy post-implant evaluation among seven Italian institutes.
Mangili P; Stea L; Cattani F; Lappi S; Giglioli F; Calamia E; Ziglio F; Martinelli R; Longobardi B
Radiother Oncol; 2004 Apr; 71(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 15066291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetry accuracy as a function of seed localization uncertainty in permanent prostate brachytherapy: increased seed number correlates with less variability in prostate dosimetry.
Su Y; Davis BJ; Furutani KM; Herman MG; Robb RA
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 52(11):3105-19. PubMed ID: 17505092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Moving toward focal therapy in prostate cancer: dual-isotope permanent seed implants as a possible solution.
Todor DA; Barani IJ; Lin PS; Anscher MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):297-304. PubMed ID: 21536392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Intraoperative and post-implant dosimetry in patients treated with permanent prostate implant brachytherapy].
Herein A; Ágoston P; Szabó Z; Jorgo K; Markgruber B; Pesznyák C; Polgár C; Major T
Magy Onkol; 2015 Jun; 59(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 26035163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tissue composition and density impact on the clinical parameters for (125)I prostate implants dosimetry.
Oliveira SM; Teixeira NJ; Fernandes L; Teles P; Vieira G; Vaz P
Phys Med; 2014 Nov; 30(7):799-808. PubMed ID: 25239870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of prostate size and isotope selection on dosimetric quality following permanent seed implantation.
Merrick GS; Butler WM; Dorsey AT; Lief JH
Tech Urol; 2001 Sep; 7(3):233-40. PubMed ID: 11575521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An open-source genetic algorithm for determining optimal seed distributions for low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy.
McGeachy P; Madamesila J; Beauchamp A; Khan R
Brachytherapy; 2015; 14(5):692-702. PubMed ID: 26023047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Focal high-dose-rate brachytherapy: a dosimetric comparison of hemigland vs. conventional whole-gland treatment.
Kamrava M; Chung MP; Kayode O; Wang J; Marks L; Kupelian P; Steinberg M; Park SJ; Demanes DJ
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(5):434-41. PubMed ID: 23406987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate brachytherapy post-implant dosimetry: a comparison between higher and lower source density.
Thomas CW; Kruk A; McGahan CE; Spadinger I; Morris WJ
Radiother Oncol; 2007 Apr; 83(1):18-24. PubMed ID: 17368844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
