1310 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233221)
1. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A round-robin gamma stereotactic radiosurgery dosimetry interinstitution comparison of calibration protocols.
Drzymala RE; Alvarez PE; Bednarz G; Bourland JD; DeWerd LA; Ma L; Meltsner SG; Neyman G; Novotny J; Petti PL; Rivard MJ; Shiu AS; Goetsch SJ
Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6745-56. PubMed ID: 26520764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. On the use of the absorbed depth-dose measurements in the beam calibration of a surface electronic high-dose-rate brachytherapy unit, a Monte Carlo-based study.
Valdes-Cortez C; Niatsetski Y; Ballester F; Vijande J; Candela-Juan C; Perez-Calatayud J
Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):693-702. PubMed ID: 31722113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
Araki F; Kubo HD
Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy electron beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Song H; Andreo P; Houser CJ
Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2077-87. PubMed ID: 11695769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Microionization chamber air-kerma calibration coefficients as a function of photon energy for x-ray spectra in the range of 20-250 kVp relative to 60Co.
Snow JR; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2013 Apr; 40(4):041711. PubMed ID: 23556881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Simulation evaluation of NIST air-kerma rate calibration standard for electronic brachytherapy.
Hiatt JR; Rivard MJ; Hughes HG
Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 43(3):1119-29. PubMed ID: 26936699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A formalism for traceable dosimetry in superficial electronic brachytherapy (eBT).
de Prez L; Avilés Lucas P; Kok E
Phys Med Biol; 2023 Aug; 68(17):. PubMed ID: 37451251
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric characterization and output verification for conical brachytherapy surface applicators. Part I. Electronic brachytherapy source.
Fulkerson RK; Micka JA; DeWerd LA
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):022103. PubMed ID: 24506635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Depth-dose measurement corrections for the surface electronic brachytherapy beams of an Esteya
Valdes-Cortez C; Ballester F; Vijande J; Gimenez V; Gimenez-Alventosa V; Perez-Calatayud J; Niatsetski Y; Andreo P
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):. PubMed ID: 32464622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Surface applicator calibration and commissioning of an electronic brachytherapy system for nonmelanoma skin cancer treatment.
Rong Y; Welsh JS
Med Phys; 2010 Oct; 37(10):5509-17. PubMed ID: 21089786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reference dosimetry in clinical high-energy photon beams: comparison of the AAPM TG-51 and AAPM TG-21 dosimetry protocols.
Saiful Huq M; Andreo P
Med Phys; 2001 Jan; 28(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 11213922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A dosimetry study comparing NCS report-5, IAEA TRS-381, AAPM TG-51 and IAEA TRS-398 in three clinical electron beam energies.
Palmans H; Nafaa L; de Patoul N; Denis JM; Tomsej M; Vynckier S
Phys Med Biol; 2003 May; 48(9):1091-107. PubMed ID: 12765324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Calculated absorbed-dose ratios, TG51/TG21, for most widely used cylindrical and parallel-plate ion chambers over a range of photon and electron energies.
Tailor RC; Hanson WF
Med Phys; 2002 Jul; 29(7):1464-72. PubMed ID: 12148727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. An evaluation of ionization chambers for the relative dosimetry of kilovoltage x-ray beams.
Hill R; Mo Z; Haque M; Baldock C
Med Phys; 2009 Sep; 36(9):3971-81. PubMed ID: 19810470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electron beam water calorimetry measurements to obtain beam quality conversion factors.
Muir BR; Cojocaru CD; McEwen MR; Ross CK
Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):5433-5444. PubMed ID: 28688120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
