BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233243)

  • 1. Biomechanical testing of circumferential instrumentation after cervical multilevel corpectomy.
    Hartmann S; Thomé C; Keiler A; Fritsch H; Hegewald AA; Schmölz W
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2788-98. PubMed ID: 26233243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Construct stability of an instrumented 2-level cervical corpectomy model following fatigue testing: biomechanical comparison of circumferential antero-posterior instrumentation versus a novel anterior-only transpedicular screw-plate fixation technique.
    Koller H; Schmoelz W; Zenner J; Auffarth A; Resch H; Hitzl W; Malekzadeh D; Ernstbrunner L; Blocher M; Mayer M
    Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2848-56. PubMed ID: 25612849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cement-augmented screws in a cervical two-level corpectomy with anterior titanium mesh cage reconstruction: a biomechanical study.
    Hartmann S; Thomé C; Tschugg A; Paesold J; Kavakebi P; Schmölz W
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Apr; 26(4):1047-1057. PubMed ID: 28108780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior and combined techniques for the reconstruction of a 2-level cervical corpectomy model: biomechanical study and first results of ATPS prototyping.
    Koller H; Schmidt R; Mayer M; Hitzl W; Zenner J; Midderhoff S; Graf N; Resch H; Wilke HJ
    Eur Spine J; 2010 Dec; 19(12):2137-48. PubMed ID: 20589516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical comparison of anterior cervical spine instrumentation techniques with and without supplemental posterior fusion after different corpectomy and discectomy combinations: Laboratory investigation.
    Setzer M; Eleraky M; Johnson WM; Aghayev K; Tran ND; Vrionis FD
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2012 Jun; 16(6):579-84. PubMed ID: 22423633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical comparison of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation after one-level anterior cervical corpectomy in the human cadaveric spine.
    Karam YR; Dahdaleh NS; Magnetta MJ; Kim BS; Lim TH; Serhan H; Torner JC; Hitchon PW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Apr; 36(7):E455-60. PubMed ID: 20847712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
    Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
    Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
    Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Limitations of the cervical porcine spine in evaluating spinal implants in comparison with human cervical spinal segments: a biomechanical in vitro comparison of porcine and human cervical spine specimens with different instrumentation techniques.
    Schmidt R; Richter M; Claes L; Puhl W; Wilke HJ
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jun; 30(11):1275-82. PubMed ID: 15928552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical evaluation of an integrated fixation cage during fatigue loading: a human cadaver study.
    Palepu V; Peck JH; Simon DD; Helgeson MD; Nagaraja S
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Apr; 26(4):524-531. PubMed ID: 28128700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
    Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pedicle screws enhance primary stability in multilevel cervical corpectomies: biomechanical in vitro comparison of different implants including constrained and nonconstrained posterior instumentations.
    Schmidt R; Wilke HJ; Claes L; Puhl W; Richter M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1821-8. PubMed ID: 12923469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The biomechanical stability of a novel spacer with integrated plate in contiguous two-level and three-level ACDF models: an in vitro cadaveric study.
    Clavenna AL; Beutler WJ; Gudipally M; Moldavsky M; Khalil S
    Spine J; 2012 Feb; 12(2):157-63. PubMed ID: 22405617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Properties of an interspinous fixation device (ISD) in lumbar fusion constructs: a biomechanical study.
    Techy F; Mageswaran P; Colbrunn RW; Bonner TF; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):572-9. PubMed ID: 23498926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Biomechanical consequences of cervical spondylectomy versus corpectomy.
    Doğan S; Baek S; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Neurosurgery; 2008 Oct; 63(4 Suppl 2):303-8; discussion 308. PubMed ID: 18981835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanics of an integrated interbody device versus ACDF anterior locking plate in a single-level cervical spine fusion construct.
    Stein MI; Nayak AN; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Santoni BG; Castellvi AE
    Spine J; 2014 Jan; 14(1):128-36. PubMed ID: 24231054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Stabilizing potential of anterior, posterior, and circumferential fixation for multilevel cervical arthrodesis: an in vitro human cadaveric study of the operative and adjacent segment kinematics.
    Dmitriev AE; Kuklo TR; Lehman RA; Rosner MK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):E188-96. PubMed ID: 17413459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Biomechanical comparison of instrumented and uninstrumented multilevel cervical discectomy versus corpectomy.
    Galler RM; Dogan S; Fifield MS; Bozkus H; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(11):1220-6. PubMed ID: 17495779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanical comparison of transarticular facet screws to lateral mass plates in two-level instrumentations of the cervical spine.
    DalCanto RA; Lieberman I; Inceoglu S; Kayanja M; Ferrara L
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Apr; 30(8):897-2. PubMed ID: 15834333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A zero-profile anchored spacer in multilevel cervical anterior interbody fusion: biomechanical comparison to established fixation techniques.
    Scholz M; Schleicher P; Pabst S; Kandziora F
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Apr; 40(7):E375-80. PubMed ID: 25584947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.