179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 26233243)
21. Biomechanical comparison of a two-level anterior discectomy and a one-level corpectomy, combined with fusion and anterior plate reconstruction in the cervical spine.
Aghayev K; Doulgeris JJ; Gonzalez-Blohm SA; Eleraky M; Lee WE; Vrionis FD
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2014 Jan; 29(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 24239024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Spinal instrumentation after complete resection of the last lumbar vertebra: an in vitro biomechanical study after L5 spondylectomy.
Bartanusz V; Muzumdar A; Hussain M; Moldavsky M; Bucklen B; Khalil S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Jun; 36(13):1017-21. PubMed ID: 21224772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Biomechanical evaluation of a novel total cervical prosthesis in a single-level cervical subtotal corpectomy model: an in vitro human cadaveric study.
Wu ZX; Han BJ; Zhao X; Kong L; Liu D; Cui G; Lei W
J Surg Res; 2012 Jun; 175(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 21492873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Biomechanical contribution of transverse connectors to segmental stability following long segment instrumentation with thoracic pedicle screws.
Kuklo TR; Dmitriev AE; Cardoso MJ; Lehman RA; Erickson M; Gill NW
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jul; 33(15):E482-7. PubMed ID: 18594445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of constrained posterior screw and rod systems for primary stability: biomechanical in vitro comparison of various instrumentations in a single-level corpectomy model.
Schmidt R; Wilke HJ; Claes L; Puhl W; Richter M
Eur Spine J; 2005 May; 14(4):372-80. PubMed ID: 15248055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effect of spinal instrumentation on kinematics at the cervicothoracic junction: emphasis on soft-tissue response in an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Kretzer RM; Hu N; Umekoji H; Sciubba DM; Jallo GI; McAfee PC; Tortolani PJ; Cunningham BW
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 Oct; 13(4):435-42. PubMed ID: 20887140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Biomechanical comparison of transfacet screws to lateral mass screw-rod constructs in the lower cervical spine.
Tong J; Ji W; Zhou R; Huang Z; Liu S; Zhu Q
Eur Spine J; 2016 Jun; 25(6):1787-93. PubMed ID: 26530298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Unilateral laminoplasty with lateral mass screw fixation for less invasive decompression of the cervical spine: a biomechanical investigation.
Schmeiser G; Schilling C; Grupp TM; Papavero L; Püschel K; Kothe R
Eur Spine J; 2015 Dec; 24(12):2781-7. PubMed ID: 26350248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Biomechanical evaluation of occipitocervicothoracic fusion: impact of partial or sequential fixation.
Cheng BC; Hafez MA; Cunningham B; Serhan H; Welch WC
Spine J; 2008; 8(5):821-6. PubMed ID: 17981098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of multilevel lumbar disc arthroplasty on the operative- and adjacent-level kinematics and intradiscal pressures: an in vitro human cadaveric assessment.
Dmitriev AE; Gill NW; Kuklo TR; Rosner MK
Spine J; 2008; 8(6):918-25. PubMed ID: 18178528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biomechanics of the lower thoracic spine after decompression and fusion: a cadaveric analysis.
Lubelski D; Healy AT; Mageswaran P; Benzel EC; Mroz TE
Spine J; 2014 Sep; 14(9):2216-23. PubMed ID: 24662217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Biomechanical analysis of an interbody cage with three integrated cancellous lag screws in a two-level cervical spine fusion construct: an in vitro study.
Nayak AN; Stein MI; James CR; Gaskins RB; Cabezas AF; Adu-Lartey M; Castellvi AE; Santoni BG
Spine J; 2014 Dec; 14(12):3002-10. PubMed ID: 24948039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Optimal reconstruction technique after C-2 corpectomy and spondylectomy: a biomechanical analysis.
Scheer JK; Tang J; Eguizabal J; Farin A; Buckley JM; Deviren V; McClellan RT; Ames CP
J Neurosurg Spine; 2010 May; 12(5):517-24. PubMed ID: 20441484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone lumbar polyether-ether-ketone interbody cage with integrated screws.
Kornblum MB; Turner AW; Cornwall GB; Zatushevsky MA; Phillips FM
Spine J; 2013 Jan; 13(1):77-84. PubMed ID: 23295035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. A comparative biomechanical analysis of spinal instability and instrumentation of the cervicothoracic junction: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Prybis BG; Tortolani PJ; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC; Cunningham BW
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 May; 20(3):233-8. PubMed ID: 17473645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical evaluation of transfacet screw fixation for stabilization of multilevel cervical corpectomies.
Lee YP; Robertson C; Mahar A; Kuper M; Lee DS; Regev GJ; Garfin SR
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jun; 24(4):258-63. PubMed ID: 20844449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical evaluation of paracoccygeal transsacral fixation.
Akesen B; Wu C; Mehbod AA; Transfeldt EE
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2008 Feb; 21(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 18418135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Anterior Transdiscal Axial Screw Fixation for Subaxial Cervical Spine: A Biomechanical Study.
Zheng M; Ji W; Zou L; Huang Z; Zhu Q; Qu D
World Neurosurg; 2018 Feb; 110():e459-e464. PubMed ID: 29133006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Plate fixation in the cervical spine: traditional paramedian screw configuration compared with unique unilateral configuration.
Mageswaran P; McLain RF; Colbrunn R; Bonner T; Hothem E; Bartsch A
J Neurosurg Spine; 2013 Jun; 18(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 23600582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Biomechanics of stabilization after cervicothoracic compression-flexion injury.
Ames CP; Bozkus MH; Chamberlain RH; Acosta FL; Papadopoulos SM; Sonntag VK; Crawford NR
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Jul; 30(13):1505-12. PubMed ID: 15990664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
